She's not significant today, and yet...

[Boris Farage 353]

5 hours ago, Falcon Cara said:

Trump is getting ready for the 2020 Elections, some of the Dems are still trying to win the 2016 Election

 

 

Trump is getting ready to WIN the 2020 elections.

 

It's unfortunate the Democrats have no ideas or strategy other than whining. I was hoping for Mr. Trump to enjoy a scrappy fight. From an entertainment perspective, it's such a shame the walk to re-election will be a walk in the park. But at least we don't have to worry about the future. Four more years is the Democrats worst fear, because they know they won't win an election for many, many years after that.

[laylalex 7,300]

12 hours ago, ALFKAD said:

Since you asked so nicely...

https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/hillary-clinton-blames-voter-suppression-for-her-election-loss

 

Why is "race hustler" offensive?

 

"

Race Hustler

A term coined to describe those individuals of a particular race who project themselves into the media spotlight as spokespersons whenever there is an alledged racial incident which involves their race. The use of the word "Hustler", included as a part of the term, also implies that these individuals expliot a racial situation to serve their own interests. "

Well, Urban Dictionary is certainly one choice for *accurate* definitions...  

 

It's offensive because it's only ever pointed at races other than white people. That's all. That's my opinion and I don't really feel like arguing it, since we're not going to agree. There are less offensive ways of getting across the same point, whether it's appropriate or not.  

[Falcon Cara 378]

1 hour ago, Boris Farage said:

Trump is getting ready to WIN the 2020 elections.

 

It's unfortunate the Democrats have no ideas or strategy other than whining. I was hoping for Mr. Trump to enjoy a scrappy fight. From an entertainment perspective, it's such a shame the walk to re-election will be a walk in the park. But at least we don't have to worry about the future. Four more years is the Democrats worst fear, because they know they won't win an election for many, many years after that.

 

I feel the same way.  I just don't see any viable candidate to beat Trump, and if the economy is still strong he will be a shoe in and win by a landslide

 

 

Edited September 22, 2019 by Falcon Cara

[Randyandyuni 2,682]

I agree Trump will win, however, if the left can field a candidate that binds the various groups together, it gets murkier and the victory is not a slam dunk. That candidate isn't Bernie or Biden ..

[Dashinka 24,803]

4 minutes ago, Randyandyuni said:

I agree Trump will win, however, if the left can field a candidate that binds the various groups together, it gets murkier and the victory is not a slam dunk. That candidate isn't Bernie or Biden ..

Can the Left find a candidate that binds the various political identity categories together, get them all to vote the same way, and actually get them to the polls?

[laylalex 7,300]

Warren's going to be the candidate. Things are moving in that direction, and she has a lot more enthusiasm amongst supporters and potential supporters. I haven't selected a candidate yet, but I have given money to several campaigns in the past few weeks: Harris, Warren, Buttigieg and Klobuchar. I want all of them to stay on the debate stage. I gave Klobuchar the most, because I hadn't yet donated to her campaign, and I think she needs the money more right now.

[Boiler 46,123]

The no hopers are only staying in to raise money for other campaigns.

 

No CIS Gendered males I see.

[Dashinka 24,803]

17 minutes ago, laylalex said:

Warren's going to be the candidate. Things are moving in that direction, and she has a lot more enthusiasm amongst supporters and potential supporters. I haven't selected a candidate yet, but I have given money to several campaigns in the past few weeks: Harris, Warren, Buttigieg and Klobuchar. I want all of them to stay on the debate stage. I gave Klobuchar the most, because I hadn't yet donated to her campaign, and I think she needs the money more right now.

Senator Warren seems to be fully embracing the radical leftist agenda.  It may be hard for her to win over those independents that don’t believe we need to spend trillions of dollars on more government programs.

1 minute ago, Boiler said:

The no hopers are only staying in to raise money for other campaigns.

 

No CIS Gendered males I see.

And to increase their speaking fees as “former presidential candidates”.

[Ban Hammer 13,555]

1 hour ago, laylalex said:

Warren's going to be the candidate. Things are moving in that direction, and she has a lot more enthusiasm amongst supporters and potential supporters. I haven't selected a candidate yet, but I have given money to several campaigns in the past few weeks: Harris, Warren, Buttigieg and Klobuchar. I want all of them to stay on the debate stage. I gave Klobuchar the most, because I hadn't yet donated to her campaign, and I think she needs the money more right now.

now all we need is for the other half to be picked for this to become reality.

[Voice of Reason 10,298]

2 hours ago, laylalex said:

Well, Urban Dictionary is certainly one choice for *accurate* definitions...  

 

It's offensive because it's only ever pointed at races other than white people. That's all. That's my opinion and I don't really feel like arguing it, since we're not going to agree. There are less offensive ways of getting across the same point, whether it's appropriate or not.  

In this case, UD is highly accurate.  Show me a better definition and I'll look it over.

 

I agree.  And do you realize why?  Minorities are not allowed to be called out as racist (though they are, and oftentimes more so than whites).  That is a "thing" for whites only.  

 

I don't recall too many instances of whites in the public hustling to make racism work to their advantage.  I'm sure there are a few, just haven't seen it myself.  But race hustler is a very accurate term for Stacy Abrams.  Glad she lost, and I don't live in GA anymore.

[Falcon Cara 378]

5 hours ago, laylalex said:

Warren's going to be the candidate. Things are moving in that direction, and she has a lot more enthusiasm amongst supporters and potential supporters. I haven't selected a candidate yet, but I have given money to several campaigns in the past few weeks: Harris, Warren, Buttigieg and Klobuchar. I want all of them to stay on the debate stage. I gave Klobuchar the most, because I hadn't yet donated to her campaign, and I think she needs the money more right now.

I sure don't see her being the candidate, I have no horse in that race but she sure don't seem like the one that will be going against Trump.

 

If she is then it would for sure be a landslide victory similar to the Reagan in 1984.   Trump offered to donate 1 million dollars to her favorite charity if she took a DNA to prove she was Indian. 

 

 

[Shiran 1,134]

I can't help but think that cries of "voter suppression" is a bit of analogue to "illegals and non-citizens voting" Both of those things do happen, rarely, but not in statistically significant amount to swing things one way or the other. 
Regardless, as far as I know every absentee ballots and vote by mail things exist, so there should be minimal amount of excuses to not vote. Though, to be honest having election date be a federally mandated national holiday would make a heck of a lot sense. 

[Cyberfx1024 7,980]

7 hours ago, laylalex said:

Warren's going to be the candidate. Things are moving in that direction, and she has a lot more enthusiasm amongst supporters and potential supporters. I haven't selected a candidate yet, but I have given money to several campaigns in the past few weeks: Harris, Warren, Buttigieg and Klobuchar. I want all of them to stay on the debate stage. I gave Klobuchar the most, because I hadn't yet donated to her campaign, and I think she needs the money more right now.

I  think it will be Warren as well because I think Biden will get out due to medical reasons.

 

I have already seen some of the Leftists say that they aren't voting due to some of the antics so far. When I mean antics I mean doing everything they can to keep Tulsi out of the last debate.

Edited September 23, 2019 by Cyberfx1024

[Nature Boy 2.0 8,382]

1 hour ago, Shiran said:

I can't help but think that cries of "voter suppression" is a bit of analogue to "illegals and non-citizens voting" Both of those things do happen, rarely, but not in statistically significant amount to swing things one way or the other. 
Regardless, as far as I know every absentee ballots and vote by mail things exist, so there should be minimal amount of excuses to not vote. Though, to be honest having election date be a federally mandated national holiday would make a heck of a lot sense. 

That would probably help conservative canadities , their supporters tend to have jobs on a more regular basis 

[Nature Boy 2.0 8,382]

9 hours ago, laylalex said:

Well, Urban Dictionary is certainly one choice for *accurate* definitions...  

 

It's offensive because it's only ever pointed at races other than white people. That's all. That's my opinion and I don't really feel like arguing it, since we're not going to agree. There are less offensive ways of getting across the same point, whether it's appropriate or not.  

Speaking of things being pointed at only certain races. Being accused of being a racist on a daily basis usually only happens to white people.

 

This Race Hustler is one of the most vile racist, anti semitic, corrupt individuals that has ever walked the face of the earth.  He has also destroyed many lives with false accusations of racial attacks. Tawana Brawley, The Lacrosse team just for 2.

 

https://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2019/09/19/rep_gaetz_grills_al_sharpton_have_you_ever_called_jews_white_interlopers_or_diamond_merchants.html