Jump to content
laylalex

Is anyone watching the debates tonight and tomorrow?

 Share

1,276 posts in this topic

Recommended Posts

Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Ecuador
Timeline
1 hour ago, Boiler said:

what can be done?

Excellent question.

Current dual titles:  Big Chief Sitting Bolshevik / Big Chief Spewing Bull

Strip those.

New title:  Big Chief Stolen Valor

06-04-2007 = TSC stamps postal return-receipt for I-129f.

06-11-2007 = NOA1 date (unknown to me).

07-20-2007 = Phoned Immigration Officer; got WAC#; where's NOA1?

09-25-2007 = Touch (first-ever).

09-28-2007 = NOA1, 23 days after their 45-day promise to send it (grrrr).

10-20 & 11-14-2007 = Phoned ImmOffs; "still pending."

12-11-2007 = 180 days; file is "between workstations, may be early Jan."; touches 12/11 & 12/12.

12-18-2007 = Call; file is with Division 9 ofcr. (bckgrnd check); e-prompt to shake it; touch.

12-19-2007 = NOA2 by e-mail & web, dated 12-18-07 (187 days; 201 per VJ); in mail 12/24/07.

01-09-2008 = File from USCIS to NVC, 1-4-08; NVC creates file, 1/15/08; to consulate 1/16/08.

01-23-2008 = Consulate gets file; outdated Packet 4 mailed to fiancee 1/27/08; rec'd 3/3/08.

04-29-2008 = Fiancee's 4-min. consular interview, 8:30 a.m.; much evidence brought but not allowed to be presented (consul: "More proof! Second interview! Bring your fiance!").

05-05-2008 = Infuriating $12 call to non-English-speaking consulate appointment-setter.

05-06-2008 = Better $12 call to English-speaker; "joint" interview date 6/30/08 (my selection).

06-30-2008 = Stokes Interrogations w/Ecuadorian (not USC); "wait 2 weeks; we'll mail her."

07-2008 = Daily calls to DOS: "currently processing"; 8/05 = Phoned consulate, got Section Chief; wrote him.

08-07-08 = E-mail from consulate, promising to issue visa "as soon as we get her passport" (on 8/12, per DHL).

08-27-08 = Phoned consulate (they "couldn't find" our file); visa DHL'd 8/28; in hand 9/1; through POE on 10/9 with NO hassles(!).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The point is

Why would she lie about her ethnicity,  unless she was trying to gain something?

Why hasnt she been disbarred for lying on her bar application?

In most places lying on job applications gets you fired.

 

Close your eyes and imagine the poop show if a conservative had been caught impersonating a minority for personal gain.

Of course there is no way a liberal college professor would lie to protect another radical liberal.

Dr Ford proved liberal academic types celebrate fabrications. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

But NB, if she didn't know it wasn't correct and she believed it to be true, it's not lying. It's just being misinformed. There are so many cases where people grow up thinking their entire family tree is white, and then it turns out their parent "passed" as white and never told them that they weren't "all white" (whatever that means). So if she was told "you're of Native American blood" from when she was a small child, why would she think to doubt it? I don't think it's a lie if you believe it to be true when you say it. That doesn't mean it isn't false.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: Timeline
4 minutes ago, laylalex said:

But NB, if she didn't know it wasn't correct and she believed it to be true, it's not lying. It's just being misinformed. There are so many cases where people grow up thinking their entire family tree is white, and then it turns out their parent "passed" as white and never told them that they weren't "all white" (whatever that means). So if she was told "you're of Native American blood" from when she was a small child, why would she think to doubt it? I don't think it's a lie if you believe it to be true when you say it. That doesn't mean it isn't false.

If she thought that from a child onwards, it would have been on all her apps.  She wouldn't be going back and changing them later, would she?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, ALFKAD said:

If she thought that from a child onwards, it would have been on all her apps.  She wouldn't be going back and changing them later, would she?

Well, I am not as old as she is, so I don't know if it was always an option on all applications. And perhaps she thought sometimes it would be disadvantageous and sometimes it would be advantageous to mention it, as she really isn't (as she knew then) full-blooded Native American. The history of passing and code-switching in this country is complicated and as a white person I'm not really qualified to talk about it much. A good friend of mine is biracial and has at times called herself white, black, or biracial, as it suited her. Of course, all are true. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: Timeline
28 minutes ago, laylalex said:

Well, I am not as old as she is, so I don't know if it was always an option on all applications. And perhaps she thought sometimes it would be disadvantageous and sometimes it would be advantageous to mention it, as she really isn't (as she knew then) full-blooded Native American. The history of passing and code-switching in this country is complicated and as a white person I'm not really qualified to talk about it much. A good friend of mine is biracial and has at times called herself white, black, or biracial, as it suited her. Of course, all are true. 

And if she put black on her paperwork in order to gain a hiring advantage, so be it.  She has that right via an honest claim.  Liawatha?  Not so much.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

43 minutes ago, laylalex said:

But NB, if she didn't know it wasn't correct and she believed it to be true, it's not lying. It's just being misinformed. There are so many cases where people grow up thinking their entire family tree is white, and then it turns out their parent "passed" as white and never told them that they weren't "all white" (whatever that means). So if she was told "you're of Native American blood" from when she was a small child, why would she think to doubt it? I don't think it's a lie if you believe it to be true when you say it. That doesn't mean it isn't false.

Omg sweet pea. She didnt know she wasnt an Indian of the non Patel variety?

You cant be serious!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

35 minutes ago, laylalex said:

Well, I am not as old as she is, so I don't know if it was always an option on all applications. And perhaps she thought sometimes it would be disadvantageous and sometimes it would be advantageous to mention it, as she really isn't (as she knew then) full-blooded Native American. The history of passing and code-switching in this country is complicated and as a white person I'm not really qualified to talk about it much. A good friend of mine is biracial and has at times called herself white, black, or biracial, as it suited her. Of course, all are true. 

True for your friend not for pocahontas. 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't know, if my parents and grandparents had told me I was part something, I'd believe it. Why would I doubt it? Outward appearance doesn't always say everything. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

33 minutes ago, Nature Boy 2.0 said:

Omg sweet pea. She didnt know she wasnt an Indian of the non Patel variety?

You cant be serious!

Not that I believe Warren's claims one bit...  but I had this aunt, she always was a bit dotty upstairs, but she swore that she was Native American when I was little. Did the research, happy to report she was hilariously 100% German. Probably would have crushed her to know the truth (honestly swear she'd use bronzer.. and tried to style her hair like.. ugh it's so stupid). It's really weird how some people want to make themselves be another culture they are not, nor do I know why you'd make such an odd claim to try and get into a school. Now my other aunt that recently passed, she made similar claims, but she was correct in them. Her ancestors went waaaaaaay back to native indigenous peoples in Mexico and then later French settlers that intermarried before Texas even existed.

Edited by yuna628

Our Journey Timeline  - Immigration and the Health Exchange Price of Love in the UK Thinking of Returning to UK?

 

First met: 12/31/04 - Engaged: 9/24/09
Filed I-129F: 10/4/14 - Packet received: 10/7/14
NOA 1 email + ARN assigned: 10/10/14 (hard copy 10/17/14)
Touched on website (fixed?): 12/9/14 - Poked USCIS: 4/1/15
NOA 2 email: 5/4/15 (hard copy 5/11/15)
Sent to NVC: 5/8/15 - NVC received + #'s assigned: 5/15/15 (estimated)
NVC sent: 5/19/15 - London received/ready: 5/26/15
Packet 3: 5/28/15 - Medical: 6/16/15
Poked London 7/1/15 - Packet 4: 7/2/15
Interview: 7/30/15 - Approved!
AP + Issued 8/3/15 - Visa in hand (depot): 8/6/15
POE: 8/27/15

Wedding: 9/30/15

Filed I-485, I-131, I-765: 11/7/15

Packet received: 11/9/15

NOA 1 txt/email: 11/15/15 - NOA 1 hardcopy: 11/19/15

Bio: 12/9/15

EAD + AP approved: 1/25/16 - EAD received: 2/1/16

RFE for USCIS inability to read vax instructions: 5/21/16 (no e-notification & not sent from local office!)

RFE response sent: 6/7/16 - RFE response received 6/9/16

AOS approved/card in production: 6/13/16  

NOA 2 hardcopy + card sent 6/17/16

Green Card received: 6/18/16

USCIS 120 day reminder notice: 2/22/18

Filed I-751: 5/2/18 - Packet received: 5/4/18

NOA 1:  5/29/18 (12 mo ext) 8/13/18 (18 mo ext)  - Bio: 6/27/18

Transferred: Potomac Service Center 3/26/19

Approved/New Card Produced status: 4/25/19 - NOA2 hardcopy 4/29/19

10yr Green Card Received: 5/2/19 with error >_<

N400 : 7/16/23 - Oath : 10/19/23

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: Timeline
25 minutes ago, laylalex said:

I don't know, if my parents and grandparents had told me I was part something, I'd believe it. Why would I doubt it? Outward appearance doesn't always say everything. 

Again... if she believed she was indian from birth, why wait until so late in life to use it on her apps?  One would think pride in heritage would have started at a much younger age.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: O-2 Visa Country: Sweden
Timeline
1 hour ago, Nature Boy 2.0 said:

True for your friend not for pocahontas. 

 

 

Regardless of what Trump called her, what box she checked, what her Grandmother said about what tribes, what the Trumpanistas want to believe to make themselves feel better , she has genetic markers that can only come from the empirical fact that she has a Native American ancestors. 

 

If you have the ancestors and it doesn't appear, it does not disprove anything. If you have ancestry and the markers it is proof 99.99999% positive.

 

That is the science. That is truth.

 

I am not saying she has the right to identify as a Tribal member, but it certainly should be the sign that folks calling her a list should just hush.

 

If you have some plausible explanation for how a European might have Native American genes that doesn't involve KonTiki type voyages, please share.

Edited by 90DayFinancier
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, 90DayFinancier said:

Regardless of what Trump called her, what box she checked, what her Grandmother said about what tribes, what the Trumpanistas want to believe to make themselves feel better , she has genetic markers that can only come from the empirical fact that she has a Native American ancestors. 

 

If you have the ancestors and it doesn't appear, it does not disprove anything. If you have ancestry and the markers it is proof 99.99999% positive.

 

That is the science. That is truth.

 

I am not saying she has the right to identify as a Tribal member, but it certainly should be the sign that folks calling her a list should just hush.

 

If you have some plausible explanation for how a European might have Native American genes that doesn't involve KonTiki type voyages, please share.

Oh dear God. 1/512 face palm 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
- Back to Top -

Important Disclaimer: Please read carefully the Visajourney.com Terms of Service. If you do not agree to the Terms of Service you should not access or view any page (including this page) on VisaJourney.com. Answers and comments provided on Visajourney.com Forums are general information, and are not intended to substitute for informed professional medical, psychiatric, psychological, tax, legal, investment, accounting, or other professional advice. Visajourney.com does not endorse, and expressly disclaims liability for any product, manufacturer, distributor, service or service provider mentioned or any opinion expressed in answers or comments. VisaJourney.com does not condone immigration fraud in any way, shape or manner. VisaJourney.com recommends that if any member or user knows directly of someone involved in fraudulent or illegal activity, that they report such activity directly to the Department of Homeland Security, Immigration and Customs Enforcement. You can contact ICE via email at Immigration.Reply@dhs.gov or you can telephone ICE at 1-866-347-2423. All reported threads/posts containing reference to immigration fraud or illegal activities will be removed from this board. If you feel that you have found inappropriate content, please let us know by contacting us here with a url link to that content. Thank you.
×
×
  • Create New...