JULY - AUGUST 2019 I-129F FILERS

[Dale. 264]

3 hours ago, AtlanticOceanLove said:

For the first time since last night I did something I haven’t done during this entire process which has been to constantly check. I’ve been fortunate to visit my fiancé twice (August & September & returning in 3.5 weeks) after submitting the petition...

last night I read someone write that they checked petitions on the site with numbers before and after theirs...  so I did the same (bad idea!!) and the petition number before mine was showing on the site as “case has been received” and the one after mine was approved on Oct 9th ....and today at work... the one before mine was approved today... I was truly bummed.. bummed because the petitions before and after mine were approved and mine was sitting at “received” .... then I had to remind myself that I’ve been patient this long and perhaps the anticipation of it perhaps being this week truly got to me..  I told myself that I’d be patient and enjoy the process and the past 2 days have been  torture with my constant website checking ... I just need to remind myself that we will receive it...  ok vent over lol..  

I would really suggest not doing that.  As it wont be any help.  We all go thru at different stages.  I know how frustrating it is but that may merely add to the low feelings

[J&S12 295]

1 hour ago, MalinB said:

where can you check that...?

https://egov.uscis.gov/casestatus/landing.do

 

I just checked nearby numbers and it said Fingerprints received. 

Instead of putting your full number, change it by one or two.

[J&S12 295]

Just came across this info 😲

[Trese 174]

11 minutes ago, J&S12 said:

Just came across this info 😲

 

 

Kinda sobers me up to curb my impatience.

[J&S12 295]

21 minutes ago, Trese said:

 

 

Kinda sobers me up to curb my impatience.

I felt the same way. Lol

[kumbaya 139]

yall are creative with checking the different numbers 😂

[Maria002 54]

8 hours ago, J&S12 said:

https://egov.uscis.gov/casestatus/landing.do

 

I just checked nearby numbers and it said Fingerprints received. 

Instead of putting your full number, change it by one or two.

Does it actually work? I think it shows  different processes, or maybe I'm  using the wrong code. I lowered the last 2 digits of mine to 10 and it showed:  

Case Was Rejected Because It Was Improperly Filed

On August 28, 2019, we rejected your Form I-765, Application for Employment Authorization

which is  a different process. Mine says:

Case Was Received

On August 26, 2019, we received your Form I-129F, Petition for Alien Fiancé(e),

I am using the one that start with WAC, is it the right one?

[FreyandRyan 330]

4 minutes ago, Maria002 said:

Does it actually work? I think it shows  different processes, or maybe I'm  using the wrong code. I lowered the last 2 digits of mine to 10 and it showed:  

Case Was Rejected Because It Was Improperly Filed

On August 28, 2019, we rejected your Form I-765, Application for Employment Authorization

which is  a different process. Mine says:

Case Was Received

On August 26, 2019, we received your Form I-129F, Petition for Alien Fiancé(e),

I am using the one that start with WAC, is it the right one?

It shows any and all cases. Could be K1s or not. 

[Viking 142]

10 hours ago, Dale. said:

I would really suggest not doing that.  As it wont be any help.  We all go thru at different stages.  I know how frustrating it is but that may merely add to the low feelings

I agree- 

the case number was assigned in sequence - however we should recognize the complexities and difference in the individual cases - 

the distribution of cases to case officers may also dilute the linear expectancy . 

it is akin to expect the guy in front and after you when you enter the airport will arrive at their Individual destinations in the same order as they arrived ..

 

Use the date received - that is the best -statistical information may predict the likelihood of your case being processed at a particular time - but we need to allow for deviations - especially as all cases Are not equal.

 

 

Edited October 16, 2019 by Viking
Spelling

[FreyandRyan 330]

7 minutes ago, Viking said:

I agree- 

the case number was assigned in sequence - however we should recognize the complexities and difference in the individual cases - 

the distribution of cases to case officers may also dilute the linear expectancy . 

it is akin to expect the guy in front and after you when you enter the airport will arrive at their Individual destinations in the same order as they arrived ..

 

Use the date received - that is the best -statistical information may predict the likelihood of your case being processed at a particular time - but we need to allow for deviations - especially as all cases Are not equal.

 

 

I have to also assume that cases are spread out between different officers who probably work at different speeds. The level of complexity of your application must play a role in part too right? (i.e. children, past marriages, criminal history). I feel so much of it comes down to being in the lucky fast pile. 

[Viking 142]

8 minutes ago, FreyandRyan said:

I have to also assume that cases are spread out between different officers who probably work at different speeds. The level of complexity of your application must play a role in part too right? (i.e. children, past marriages, criminal history). I feel so much of it comes down to being in the lucky fast pile. 

Its just under mine 🙂 

[brainless69 251]

today is a new day everyone! i know its hard but lets stay positive.. 

[Greenbaum 12,259]

On ‎10‎/‎16‎/‎2019 at 11:45 AM, FreyandRyan said:

I have to also assume that cases are spread out between different officers who probably work at different speeds. The level of complexity of your application must play a role in part too right? (i.e. children, past marriages, criminal history). I feel so much of it comes down to being in the lucky fast pile. 

The vetting process explained.

 

From the visa petition stage to post-entry applications for immigration benefits, USCIS works closely with the U.S. Department of State (DOS), other U.S. Department of Homeland Security (DHS) components, and other partners to ensure that those seeking to lawfully enter and remain in the United States are screened and vetted thoroughly at multiple points and by multiple agencies in accordance with laws and regulations.

 

Security and integrity are central to USCIS’ mission. In the course of applying to enter the United States, being admitted, and gaining lawful permanent resident status, the fiancé(e) of a U.S citizen will undergo four to five sets of comprehensive background and security checks. Each case is reviewed by multiple agencies. USCIS and our partners continually work together to enhance our tools and procedures for identifying those who threaten our homeland or attempt to gain benefits through fraud. For example, recognizing its potential value, USCIS is exploring an expansion of the use of social media as an additional vetting tool in the background and security check process.

 

From <https://www.uscis.gov/tools/resources-congress/testimonies-and-speeches/hearing-vows-visas-investigating-k-1-fiance-fraud-senate-committee-judiciary-march-15-2017>

[FreyandRyan 330]

11 minutes ago, brainless69 said:

today is a new day everyone! i know its hard but lets stay positive.. 

It seems like no one in this thread has gotten an NOA2 yet. It sucks

[brainless69 251]

hopefully we will be some of first ones....