Tourist Visa Application Mistake; Potential issue for CR1?

[junkmart 320]

51 minutes ago, SusieQQQ said:

Is there just a weird DS160 pdf sample on the travel.state.gov website? I don’t see any definitions of who to list as family.

After being schooled, I googled DS-160 PDF. Sure enough, to the right of the question about relatives there is a little help note that says fiance, spouse, son daughter, etc.

[pushbrk 12,883]

3 hours ago, payxibka said:

I guarantee she is not the first to answer this way.  Technically,  fiancee is not a immediate relative.   Why they include it in the form definition,  one can only guess 

The old paper application did include the actual word "fiance" in the list of relatives and an applicant was asked about each. Based on the DS160 and her circumstances, I would consider this a non-issue.  If asked.  Explain just the way you did here.

[JFH 12,190]

I assume the travel agent identified herself/himself as the preparer on the application? Your wife will need to explain that the preparer asked the question without elaboration as to the USCIS definition of relative and she understood the question to be asking about blood or by-marriage relatives only, as one usually would. 

[Cathi 5,748]

If it comes up just be honest like you were here. You weren't intentionally lying.

[geowrian 22,337]

Not material, especially given that the visa was denied anyway.

Now you know for the future. Disclose it as necessary in the future, including in any interview. I doubt it would have any negative impact for a spousal visa.

[kemm360 144]

Don’t worry about it, y’all married now, you will both be fine... 

[Amadia 711]

This issue that your are getting anxiety over is really a non-issue at this point.