Interview today. More evidence requested

[Greenbaum 12,259]

3 minutes ago, Ashweehehe said:

Thanks guys. 

could they be requesting the I-864 as I have 2 K2s also? 

My minds absolutely blown atm. Do you suggest having the co sponsor fill out the i-864 instead of the petitioner then? 

We did have plenty of proof of cosponsors income at the interview.  The first window actually said she didn’t need paystubs etc as w2 and letter from employer was sufficient. 

I can see why you are confused. Beyond being nervous at the interview it would have been prudent to have clarified this at the interview with the CO but I wasn't there so I'm Monday morning quarterbacking. 

Edited June 20, 2019 by Greenbaum

[payxibka 10,045]

4 minutes ago, Ashweehehe said:

Thanks guys. 

could they be requesting the I-864 as I have 2 K2s also? 

My minds absolutely blown atm. Do you suggest having the co sponsor fill out the i-864 instead of the petitioner then? 

We did have plenty of proof of cosponsors income at the interview.  The first window actually said she didn’t need paystubs etc as w2 and letter from employer was sufficient. 

I864 is not the correct affidavit 

[Ash.1101 1,756]

6 minutes ago, Ben&Zian said:

Wouldn't be a bad idea to just get rid of the I-134. Never made much sense for the 100% requirement only then to go up to 125% with the I-864 anyways. Who knows, maybe just embassy specific, but wouldn't be too bad of an idea.

Yeah I agree 100%.

I am just curious if this is going to set a precedent. Greenbaum has seen it apparently, but I haven't in my time here.

 

Just now, payxibka said:

I864 is not the correct affidavit 

Yeah, we know, which is why we're trying to figure out why London of all places is requesting it. Going from no I-134's to requesting I-864's is a big swing. I told the OP to send an inquiry. 

[Ashweehehe 20]

2 minutes ago, payxibka said:

I864 is not the correct affidavit 

They have requested form I-864, I-864EZ or I-864w

[Ashweehehe 20]

1 minute ago, Ash. said:

Yeah I agree 100%.

I am just curious if this is going to set a precedent. Greenbaum has seen it apparently, but I haven't in my time here.

 

Yeah, we know, which is why we're trying to figure out why London of all places is requesting it. Going from no I-134's to requesting I-864's is a big swing. I told the OP to send an inquiry. 

Dumb question. How do I find out where to send an enquiry to? 

[Greenbaum 12,259]

1 minute ago, Ash. said:

Yeah I agree 100%.

I am just curious if this is going to set a precedent. Greenbaum has seen it apparently, but I haven't in my time here.

 

Yeah, we know, which is why we're trying to figure out why London of all places is requesting it. Going from no I-134's to requesting I-864's is a big swing. I told the OP to send an inquiry. 

I believe it was India and about a month ago.  221g for i864 after presenting I-134.  Surprised the heck out of me.

[payxibka 10,045]

4 minutes ago, Ashweehehe said:

Dumb question. How do I find out where to send an enquiry to? 

https://uk.usembassy.gov/iv-contact/

[Ash.1101 1,756]

4 minutes ago, Greenbaum said:

I believe it was India and about a month ago.  221g for i864 after presenting I-134.  Surprised the heck out of me.

Crazy. I wonder if this is going to become a thing in cases where the doubt in the CO is too large. Like in my husbands case, we had to provide two cosponsors, three total I-134's since they didn't feel too great about my job history. I wonder if we had done it now if it would have just been I-864's instead.

[Greenbaum 12,259]

1 minute ago, Ash. said:

Crazy. I wonder if this is going to become a thing in cases where the doubt in the CO is too large. Like in my husbands case, we had to provide two cosponsors, three total I-134's since they didn't feel too great about my job history. I wonder if we had done it now if it would have just been I-864's instead.

I think it's still too early to draw any conclusions from this. It could be any reason that a CO could ask. Maybe new to their position,  maybe to cover their southside who knows their motivation.  We'll just need to see how this plays out. But I sure would like to see a copy of the 221g before i comment specifically on the case. 

[Ash.1101 1,756]

1 minute ago, Greenbaum said:

I think it's still too early to draw any conclusions from this. It could be any reason that a CO could ask. Maybe new to their position,  maybe to cover their southside who knows their motivation.  We'll just need to see how this plays out. But I sure would like to see a copy of the 221g before i comment specifically on the case. 

Agree'd.

@Ashweehehe

You can clear your attachments by going to the top right, click on your name, click on My Attachments, and then delete any old attachments in old threads. This will allow you to post more attachments.

[Ashweehehe 20]

7 minutes ago, Ash. said:

Agree'd.

@Ashweehehe

You can clear your attachments by going to the top right, click on your name, click on My Attachments, and then delete any old attachments in old threads. This will allow you to post more attachments.

[Ashweehehe 20]

8 minutes ago, Ash. said:

Agree'd.

@Ashweehehe

You can clear your attachments by going to the top right, click on your name, click on My Attachments, and then delete any old attachments in old threads. This will allow you to post more attachments.

 

[Ash.1101 1,756]

1 minute ago, Ashweehehe said:

Did they circle that?

Maybe they're only asking for the IRS transcript?

[payxibka 10,045]

1 minute ago, Ashweehehe said:

They are requesting transcripts,  not an i864

[Ash.1101 1,756]

2 minutes ago, Ashweehehe said:

 

Oh well shoot. @payxibka