Jump to content

44 posts in this topic

Recommended Posts

Posted

I wish the "how we met" thing would die.  You literally don't have to include that at any point - you have to provide proof and a short description proving how you meet the "physically in the same place at the same time in the last 2 years" requirement, not submit a 10 page document akin to "How I Met Your Mother" describing how you met/your whole relationship story.    At interview, you may be asked "how'd you meet?" (those I know who've been through interview already basically went with "we play the same online game and met on a facebook group for that" or "at the pub when we were in the same city" or whatever and that was that). 

 

I can understand for "tough" embassies wanting to front-load but from all accounts, proof of ongoing relationship via intermingled finances/visiting etc between submitting the petition and interview holds far more weight than manufactured "how we met"/"love story" documents before you get to that point.

Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Ecuador
Timeline
Posted

Seven off-topic posts have been removed by request.

06-04-2007 = TSC stamps postal return-receipt for I-129f.

06-11-2007 = NOA1 date (unknown to me).

07-20-2007 = Phoned Immigration Officer; got WAC#; where's NOA1?

09-25-2007 = Touch (first-ever).

09-28-2007 = NOA1, 23 days after their 45-day promise to send it (grrrr).

10-20 & 11-14-2007 = Phoned ImmOffs; "still pending."

12-11-2007 = 180 days; file is "between workstations, may be early Jan."; touches 12/11 & 12/12.

12-18-2007 = Call; file is with Division 9 ofcr. (bckgrnd check); e-prompt to shake it; touch.

12-19-2007 = NOA2 by e-mail & web, dated 12-18-07 (187 days; 201 per VJ); in mail 12/24/07.

01-09-2008 = File from USCIS to NVC, 1-4-08; NVC creates file, 1/15/08; to consulate 1/16/08.

01-23-2008 = Consulate gets file; outdated Packet 4 mailed to fiancee 1/27/08; rec'd 3/3/08.

04-29-2008 = Fiancee's 4-min. consular interview, 8:30 a.m.; much evidence brought but not allowed to be presented (consul: "More proof! Second interview! Bring your fiance!").

05-05-2008 = Infuriating $12 call to non-English-speaking consulate appointment-setter.

05-06-2008 = Better $12 call to English-speaker; "joint" interview date 6/30/08 (my selection).

06-30-2008 = Stokes Interrogations w/Ecuadorian (not USC); "wait 2 weeks; we'll mail her."

07-2008 = Daily calls to DOS: "currently processing"; 8/05 = Phoned consulate, got Section Chief; wrote him.

08-07-08 = E-mail from consulate, promising to issue visa "as soon as we get her passport" (on 8/12, per DHL).

08-27-08 = Phoned consulate (they "couldn't find" our file); visa DHL'd 8/28; in hand 9/1; through POE on 10/9 with NO hassles(!).

Filed: Other Timeline
Posted
  On 5/12/2019 at 9:11 PM, Prisonmate said:

Okay. You do it your way and I'll do it my way. What matters is the petition gets approve.

Expand  

Read the 129 F instructions. It doesn't ask to provide proof that the relationship is real. All they ask is to show your proof that you met in the last 2 years in person. That's it. Save the documentation for your interview.

 

I realize that YouTube might sound helpful and I'm sure it is in many ways. But a lot of the members here have not just seen their own case; they have seen multiple cases throughout the years and they give the advice in what they feel will help you. If you wanted to do things your way no matter what anyone says... then why come and ask for advice? Doesn't make sense in my opinion.

 

Anyway, you should be good with a brief description on how you met on question 54. They just want to know how it started then skip to the part where you met in person X number of times in the last 2 years.

 

Trying to overcompensate can backfire. You're giving too much information that can lend to more questions from the officer or requesting additional evidence over something that could have been avoided.

 

Best of luck to you.

K1 Fiance Visa: 207 days & AOS w/EAD and AP: 180 days

  Reveal hidden contents

                                                                                                                                    

ROC:                                                                                                                                                                  

08/20/21: Filed ROC

08/23/21: USCIS received package

08/25/21: Text received/Case # assigned

08/26/22: Case transferred to NBC for "speedy processing"

 

Citizenship:

08/22/22: Filed N-400 online

08/22/22: NOA1/Biometrics Reused                                                                                                           

Posted

I filed my K-1 and got approved with just : introduced by a common friend. If I were working for USCIS, I would just ignore the letter and got my work done base on official requirements.  3 pages explaining the growth of a relationship...for K-1, unless I am bored.

 

However, I do not see it a big deal to include that  ❤️  letter: it is just an unnecessary work.

Filed: AOS (apr) Country: Philippines
Timeline
Posted
  On 5/13/2019 at 6:47 PM, nguoivietnam2019 said:

 

 

However, I do not see it a big deal to include that  ❤️  letter: it is just an unnecessary work.

Expand  

Hang around here long enough and you will understand 

YMMV

Filed: AOS (apr) Country: Philippines
Timeline
Posted
  On 5/13/2019 at 7:16 PM, nguoivietnam2019 said:

will try my best :)  but...3 pages...probably I am just not  good with literature to even come up with 1/2 page.

Expand  

Its not the uscis you have to worry so much about but the consulate.   People in their zeal to prove their relationship have made unfortunate statements in the letter or provide photo evidence that from a local customs standpoint makes them ineligible. 

YMMV

Posted
  On 5/13/2019 at 7:21 PM, payxibka said:

Its not the uscis you have to worry so much about but the consulate.   People in their zeal to prove their relationship have made unfortunate statements in the letter or provide photo evidence that from a local customs standpoint makes them ineligible. 

Expand  

Ah, you mean people talking too much about their relationship making them like a married couple rather than just engaged couple ~~~> this I have heard.  I assumed 3 pages with filtered info with some logical thinking.

Filed: AOS (apr) Country: Ukraine
Timeline
Posted
  On 5/13/2019 at 7:16 PM, nguoivietnam2019 said:

will try my best :)  but...3 pages...probably I am just not  good with literature to even come up with 1/2 page.

Expand  

The reality is what is being discussed is answer to Question 54, Part 2 of form 129F. It is not a very well defined question open to creative answers and interpretations. They want to know details about in person meeting, so it is pretty natural for people to elaborate. And then of course people abbreviate the topic of the question into "How we've met" which has slightly different connotations.

 

In reality, I do not believe anyone was ever denied because they wrote/send "too much" as their answer to Part 2, Q54, so annoyance about it seems to be confined to this board and meta-brain thinking "While adjudicator is reading 3 pages story, they are not busy stamping "Approved" on my petition!" 

Filed: AOS (apr) Country: Philippines
Timeline
Posted
  On 5/13/2019 at 7:47 PM, Shiran said:

The reality is what is being discussed is answer to Question 54, Part 2 of form 129F. It is not a very well defined question open to creative answers and interpretations. They want to know details about in person meeting, so it is pretty natural for people to elaborate. And then of course people abbreviate the topic of the question into "How we've met" which has slightly different connotations.

 

In reality, I do not believe anyone was ever denied because they wrote/send "too much" as their answer to Part 2, Q54, so annoyance about it seems to be confined to this board and meta-brain thinking "While adjudicator is reading 3 pages story, they are not busy stamping "Approved" on my petition!" 

Expand  

The petition is not the problem,  the problem is that the 3 to 50 page dissertation is in the hands of the consulate and their have been k1s denied because they were deemed "to married "

YMMV

Posted

I can't imagine anybody ever being denied because they wrote too much either.

But there certainly are people who wrote something that got themselves into trouble with either USCIS or the CO. I've said it before but it's worth saying again...you have the most powerful tool available to show your case: Barring required documents, you have the ability to only show what you want them to see.

I don't know what they have access to for security checks and such, but they aren't going through your emails, hacking your facebook/messenger/viber/whatever, etc. to investigate your relationship. Show a good case but nothing more. Far more often than should be the case, somebody submits a document that causes confusion or raises questions.

Timelines:

ROC:

  Reveal hidden contents

AOS:

  Reveal hidden contents

K-1:

  Reveal hidden contents

 

Filed: K-1 Visa Country: Brazil
Timeline
Posted

1 or 2 sentences is all you need on how you met in the last 2 years nothing more. All they care about is that you met 1 time in the last 2 years so that you meet the requirement. Don't shoot yourself in the foot on accident because you can't follow the directions. If I was the person reading petitions i surely wouldn't read 3 pages  about your life story(not that your life story is bad or anything) especially not when it isn't required. 

  • 2 weeks later...
Posted
  On 5/16/2019 at 10:29 PM, dxec said:

1 or 2 sentences is all you need on how you met in the last 2 years nothing more. All they care about is that you met 1 time in the last 2 years so that you meet the requirement. Don't shoot yourself in the foot on accident because you can't follow the directions. If I was the person reading petitions i surely wouldn't read 3 pages  about your life story(not that your life story is bad or anything) especially not when it isn't required. 

Expand  

Understood. 

 

my fiance applied for a visiting visa twice and got denied both times,

we been "together" for 6 years and throughout our relationship I would have to go visit her in the UK... 

 

Should we include in the how we met section about why she wasn't able to come to the US? 

Filed: AOS (apr) Country: Philippines
Timeline
Posted (edited)
  On 5/25/2019 at 2:38 PM, toothfixer said:

Understood. 

 

my fiance applied for a visiting visa twice and got denied both times,

we been "together" for 6 years and throughout our relationship I would have to go visit her in the UK... 

 

Should we include in the how we met section about why she wasn't able to come to the US? 

Expand  

Not relevant .  If your response to the circumstances of meeting section cannot fit on the space provided by the form,  then maybe you should rethink your response 

Edited by payxibka

YMMV

 
Didn't find the answer you were looking for? Ask our VJ Immigration Lawyers.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
- Back to Top -

Important Disclaimer: Please read carefully the Visajourney.com Terms of Service. If you do not agree to the Terms of Service you should not access or view any page (including this page) on VisaJourney.com. Answers and comments provided on Visajourney.com Forums are general information, and are not intended to substitute for informed professional medical, psychiatric, psychological, tax, legal, investment, accounting, or other professional advice. Visajourney.com does not endorse, and expressly disclaims liability for any product, manufacturer, distributor, service or service provider mentioned or any opinion expressed in answers or comments. VisaJourney.com does not condone immigration fraud in any way, shape or manner. VisaJourney.com recommends that if any member or user knows directly of someone involved in fraudulent or illegal activity, that they report such activity directly to the Department of Homeland Security, Immigration and Customs Enforcement. You can contact ICE via email at Immigration.Reply@dhs.gov or you can telephone ICE at 1-866-347-2423. All reported threads/posts containing reference to immigration fraud or illegal activities will be removed from this board. If you feel that you have found inappropriate content, please let us know by contacting us here with a url link to that content. Thank you.
×
×
  • Create New...