Officials consider new penalty for visa overstays

[Ban Hammer 13,352]

one post removed for a personal insult.

discuss the topic and refrain from making personal jabs at other members.

failing to follow this directive can result in

[Hypnos 6,576]

Somewhat interesting mental gymnastics occurring.

 

On the specific subject of this administration looking to modify punishments for visa overstays, I suspect they would need Congressional approval for most of it, if they're looking to change the INA. With Trump being as mercurial as he is, it's impossible to tell until Stephen Miller gives him his instructions. 

[Dashinka 24,514]

2 hours ago, Hypnos said:

She apparently unlawfully worked in the US whilst only having a B-2 tourist visa. 

 

https://www.apnews.com/37dc7aef0ce44077930b7436be7bfd0d

 

One rule for me, another for thee... 

Was she working on behalf of a non-US based employer?  If so, then it really wasn't a rules violation.

[Dashinka 24,514]

1 hour ago, arken said:

That’s a biased statement with no proof. 

 

 

Why is it insane if the citizenship law allows certain people take the civic test in own native language and waive the English requirement test? 

Becoming a citizen should be a challenge, not a cake-walk.

[Dashinka 24,514]

1 hour ago, Hypnos said:

Somewhat interesting mental gymnastics occurring.

 

On the specific subject of this administration looking to modify punishments for visa overstays, I suspect they would need Congressional approval for most of it, if they're looking to change the INA. With Trump being as mercurial as he is, it's impossible to tell until Stephen Miller gives him his instructions. 

Wait, I thought President Trump was a puppet of Putin, now he is a puppet of Stephen Miller?  I do agree though that real change to immigration law requires Congress to act which will not happen anytime soon.  As long as President Trump doesn't author something unconstitutional such as DACA/DAPA I am fine with it.  Everything else is just Trump trolling the lefties.

[TBoneTX 45,324]

1 hour ago, Ban Hammer said:

discuss the topic and refrain from making personal jabs at other members.

In addition to the above, reserve positive or negative comments about elected/appointed officials for threads in the Current Events forum.

[arken 4,197]

14 minutes ago, Bill & Katya said:

Becoming a citizen should be a challenge, not a cake-walk.

N400 process is a challenge.

[Dashinka 24,514]

9 minutes ago, arken said:

N400 process is a challenge.

I agree for most it is, but I am not in favor of anyone getting a civics or language waiver.

19 minutes ago, TBoneTX said:

In addition to the above, reserve positive or negative comments about elected/appointed officials for threads in the Current Events forum.

Maybe this belongs in CEHST?

[TBoneTX 45,324]

11 minutes ago, Bill & Katya said:

Maybe this belongs in CEHST?

Perhaps, but it's good to see a largely different group discuss policy issues.

[Hypnos 6,576]

3 hours ago, Bill & Katya said:

Was she working on behalf of a non-US based employer?  If so, then it really wasn't a rules violation.

The AP story doesn't seem to indicate that this is the case.

 

2 hours ago, Bill & Katya said:

Wait, I thought President Trump was a puppet of Putin, now he is a puppet of Stephen Miller? 

That's the thing about puppets - it can be a different hand from day to day, as necessary. 

[Dashinka 24,514]

28 minutes ago, Hypnos said:

The AP story doesn't seem to indicate that this is the case.

 

That's the thing about puppets - it can be a different hand from day to day, as necessary. 

The AP story doesn't indicate either way, but I believe most models are independent contractors, so it might fall into that category.  It is always nice to know the entire story which is not the case here.

[treppenwitz 78]

3 hours ago, TBoneTX said:

reserve positive or negative comments about elected/appointed officials for threads in the Current Events forum.

But my neutral comment that clarified the 22nd Amendment was removed as "blatantly political" 14 hours ago!? https://www.visajourney.com/forums/topic/704364-officials-consider-new-penalty-for-visa-overstays/?do=findComment&comment=9671730

Link to the 22nd Amendment since the outcome of 2020 election was assumed by @Ironclad43 and @ineedadisplayname on Page 2 of this thread: https://constitutioncenter.org/interactive-constitution/amendments/amendment-xxii

[TBoneTX 45,324]

On 4/17/2019 at 12:11 AM, TBoneTX said:

Several noncontributory or blatantly political posts have been removed.

As others have stated, this is not the forum for such; visit the Current Events forum instead.

Here, let's stick to discussing what's posted in the linked article.

Bolded word can refer to off-topic/deraiing posts, or those quoting such material that others wrote.  Re-read third line of above.

Edited April 18, 2019 by TBoneTX

[millefleur 5,046]

**Thread is now locked in favor of new, ongoing thread on a similar topic, see below.**

 

VJ Moderation