Jump to content
SJordanS

Very VERY bad K1 situation

 Share

198 posts in this topic

Recommended Posts

5 minutes ago, C-ma'am said:

Without the immigration condiment on Sarah's story, I had this exact scenario with an ex who had been cheating for a long time and had a relationship with the other woman.  This happened over 20 years ago but I still remember when he had his mother call me. It's a manipulative tactic. 

 

Give Sarah big hugs. I remember how it all feels and it's just a devastating situation because you are a victim but because you also have to own up to all the things we chose to ignore and continued to push through. Nothing wrong with any of this. We are human, we make mistakes and we want to be loved. Imagine that, huh? 

 

Exactly, couldn't agree more.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have been following this thread. Thanks for the updates. I hope Sarah moves on quicker than expected and God bless her with a good husband in the near future, after healing or one who will help her heal.

 

As for the cheater... I hope his relationship with the girlfriend is forever ruined and they too breakup. #karma is a b....

Edited by VALU
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, VALU said:

I have been folk this thread. Thanks for the updates. I hope Sarah moves on quicker than expected and God will bless her with a good husband in the near future after healing or one that will help her heal.

 

As for the cheater... I hope his relationship with the girlfriend is forever ruined and they too breakup. #karma is a b....

They both deserve eachother, what type of woman allows her man to marry and date another, sleep with another for the purpose of a visa, she's as much a pos as he is.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Hobidyali said:

They both deserve eachother, what type of woman allows her man to marry and date another, sleep with another for the purpose of a visa, she's as much a pos as he is.

True but I doubt he will want anything to do with her after she supposedly messed up their plan by making that call... I still don't understand why she did... Was she pissed at him or what?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, VALU said:

True but I doubt he will want anything to do with her after she supposedly messed up their plan by making that call... I still don't understand why she did... Was she pissed at him or what?

I dont know exactly why she did it, but logic tells me that she did it without the interntion to speak to her but for her to see the profile and kill that relationship before it proceeded .

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Hobidyali said:

I dont know exactly why she did it, but logic tells me that she did it without the interntion to speak to her but for her to see the profile and kill that relationship before it proceeded .

That makes sense. Especially considering that she only made the call after the visa got approved. But then she blocked Sarah soon after. What if she hadn'tdug deeper soon after the call before she blocked her? Wonder how she was able to FB call someone who is not her FB friend. I tested it out on my FB but I can only call people I'm friends with.

Edited by VALU
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, VALU said:

That makes sense. Especially considering that she only made the call after the visa got approved. But then she block Sarah soon after. Wonder how she was able to FB call someone who is not her FB friend. I tested it out on my FB but I can only call people I'm friends with.

Yews, I thought the same, that part is confusing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: K-1 Visa Country: Wales
Timeline

I would imagine they would look for a non fraud reason as that requires a definitive finding, now if this had happened before the visa was approved it would be much simpler.

“If you know the enemy and know yourself, you need not fear the result of a hundred battles. If you know yourself but not the enemy, for every victory gained you will also suffer a defeat. If you know neither the enemy nor yourself, you will succumb in every battle.”

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Ecuador
Timeline

It will be interesting to learn the precise justification for revocation, if indeed this is revealed to the petitioner.

06-04-2007 = TSC stamps postal return-receipt for I-129f.

06-11-2007 = NOA1 date (unknown to me).

07-20-2007 = Phoned Immigration Officer; got WAC#; where's NOA1?

09-25-2007 = Touch (first-ever).

09-28-2007 = NOA1, 23 days after their 45-day promise to send it (grrrr).

10-20 & 11-14-2007 = Phoned ImmOffs; "still pending."

12-11-2007 = 180 days; file is "between workstations, may be early Jan."; touches 12/11 & 12/12.

12-18-2007 = Call; file is with Division 9 ofcr. (bckgrnd check); e-prompt to shake it; touch.

12-19-2007 = NOA2 by e-mail & web, dated 12-18-07 (187 days; 201 per VJ); in mail 12/24/07.

01-09-2008 = File from USCIS to NVC, 1-4-08; NVC creates file, 1/15/08; to consulate 1/16/08.

01-23-2008 = Consulate gets file; outdated Packet 4 mailed to fiancee 1/27/08; rec'd 3/3/08.

04-29-2008 = Fiancee's 4-min. consular interview, 8:30 a.m.; much evidence brought but not allowed to be presented (consul: "More proof! Second interview! Bring your fiance!").

05-05-2008 = Infuriating $12 call to non-English-speaking consulate appointment-setter.

05-06-2008 = Better $12 call to English-speaker; "joint" interview date 6/30/08 (my selection).

06-30-2008 = Stokes Interrogations w/Ecuadorian (not USC); "wait 2 weeks; we'll mail her."

07-2008 = Daily calls to DOS: "currently processing"; 8/05 = Phoned consulate, got Section Chief; wrote him.

08-07-08 = E-mail from consulate, promising to issue visa "as soon as we get her passport" (on 8/12, per DHL).

08-27-08 = Phoned consulate (they "couldn't find" our file); visa DHL'd 8/28; in hand 9/1; through POE on 10/9 with NO hassles(!).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Canada
Timeline
52 minutes ago, VALU said:

 Wonder how she was able to FB call someone who is not her FB friend. I tested it out on my FB but I can only call people I'm friends with.

 I believe it has to do with how the other person's privacy settings are?  I've made FB calls to people not on my list before.

Applied for Naturalization based on 5-year Residency - 96 Days To Complete Citizenship!

July 14, 2017 (Day 00) -  Submitted N400 Application, filed online

July 21, 2017 (Day 07) -  NOA Receipt received in the mail

July 22, 2017 (Day 08) - Biometrics appointment scheduled online, letter mailed out

July 25, 2017 (Day 11) - Biometrics PDF posted online

July 28, 2017 (Day 14) - Biometrics letter received in the mail, appointment for 08/08/17

Aug 08, 2017 (Day 24) - Biometrics (fingerprinting) completed

Aug 14, 2017 (Day 30) - Online EGOV status shows "Interview Scheduled, will mail appointment letter"

Aug 16, 2017 (Day 32) - Online MYUSCIS status shows "Interview Scheduled, read the letter we mailed you..."

Aug 17, 2017 (Day 33) - Interview Appointment Letter PDF posted online---GOT AN INTERVIEW DATE!!!

Aug 21, 2017 (Day 37) - Interview Appointment Letter received in the mail, appointment for 09/27/17

Sep. 27, 2017 (Day 74) - Naturalization Interview--- read my experience here

Sep. 27, 2017 (Day 74) - Online MYUSCIS status shows "Oath Ceremony Notice mailed"

Sep. 28, 2017 (Day 75) - Oath Ceremony Letter PDF posted online--Ceremony for 10/19/17

Oct. 02, 2017 (Day 79) -  Oath Ceremony Letter received in the mail

Oct. 19, 2017 (Day 96) -  Oath Ceremony-- read my experience here

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, TBoneTX said:

It will be interesting to learn the precise justification for revocation, if indeed this is revealed to the petitioner.

Does there have to be an exact reason? Is fraud or attempt of fraud not a justifiable reason? Does this type of situation prevent the beneficiary of ever applying for a visa and/or is there a permanent ban because of something like this?

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Hobidyali said:

Does there have to be an exact reason? Is fraud or attempt of fraud not a justifiable reason? Does this type of situation prevent the beneficiary of ever applying for a visa and/or is there a permanent ban because of something like this?

A finding of fraud or a willful, material misrepresentation must be demonstrated. That comes with a permanent (but waivable) bar on any visa.  It's not something they can just impose though - they need a factual basis. A claim by the petitioner does not constitute fact. They would need to investigate it before they could impost any such restriction.

Edited by geowrian

Timelines:

ROC:

Spoiler

7/27/20: Sent forms to Dallas lockbox, 7/30/20: Received by USCIS, 8/10 NOA1 electronic notification received, 8/1/ NOA1 hard copy received

AOS:

Spoiler

AOS (I-485 + I-131 + I-765):

9/25/17: sent forms to Chicago, 9/27/17: received by USCIS, 10/4/17: NOA1 electronic notification received, 10/10/17: NOA1 hard copy received. Social Security card being issued in married name (3rd attempt!)

10/14/17: Biometrics appointment notice received, 10/25/17: Biometrics

1/2/18: EAD + AP approved (no website update), 1/5/18: EAD + AP mailed, 1/8/18: EAD + AP approval notice hardcopies received, 1/10/18: EAD + AP received

9/5/18: Interview scheduled notice, 10/17/18: Interview

10/24/18: Green card produced notice, 10/25/18: Formal approval, 10/31/18: Green card received

K-1:

Spoiler

I-129F

12/1/16: sent, 12/14/16: NOA1 hard copy received, 3/10/17: RFE (IMB verification), 3/22/17: RFE response received

3/24/17: Approved! , 3/30/17: NOA2 hard copy received

 

NVC

4/6/2017: Received, 4/12/2017: Sent to Riyadh embassy, 4/16/2017: Case received at Riyadh embassy, 4/21/2017: Request case transfer to Manila, approved 4/24/2017

 

K-1

5/1/2017: Case received by Manila (1 week embassy transfer??? Lucky~)

7/13/2017: Interview: APPROVED!!!

7/19/2017: Visa in hand

8/15/2017: POE

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: K-1 Visa Country: Wales
Timeline

I see no ban, at the moment it is a he says she say situation, all the Consulate knows as a fact is that she does not wish to proceed.

“If you know the enemy and know yourself, you need not fear the result of a hundred battles. If you know yourself but not the enemy, for every victory gained you will also suffer a defeat. If you know neither the enemy nor yourself, you will succumb in every battle.”

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 
Didn't find the answer you were looking for? Ask our VJ Immigration Lawyers.
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
- Back to Top -

Important Disclaimer: Please read carefully the Visajourney.com Terms of Service. If you do not agree to the Terms of Service you should not access or view any page (including this page) on VisaJourney.com. Answers and comments provided on Visajourney.com Forums are general information, and are not intended to substitute for informed professional medical, psychiatric, psychological, tax, legal, investment, accounting, or other professional advice. Visajourney.com does not endorse, and expressly disclaims liability for any product, manufacturer, distributor, service or service provider mentioned or any opinion expressed in answers or comments. VisaJourney.com does not condone immigration fraud in any way, shape or manner. VisaJourney.com recommends that if any member or user knows directly of someone involved in fraudulent or illegal activity, that they report such activity directly to the Department of Homeland Security, Immigration and Customs Enforcement. You can contact ICE via email at Immigration.Reply@dhs.gov or you can telephone ICE at 1-866-347-2423. All reported threads/posts containing reference to immigration fraud or illegal activities will be removed from this board. If you feel that you have found inappropriate content, please let us know by contacting us here with a url link to that content. Thank you.
×
×
  • Create New...