Jump to content

29 posts in this topic

Recommended Posts

Posted
10 minutes ago, RobertM54 said:

Many woman make a living from their dating agency. Will that in itself disqualify her for a K-1 with a much older man?

Is it a general question, or about your fiancée? I tried to understand your timeline; didn't you interview in 2016? 

Filed: K-1 Visa Country: Ukraine
Timeline
Posted (edited)

Withdrew the 2016 petition. New potential fiancée.   She will list a specific dating agency as her employer - how does the type of services matter?

I tried to delete my old timeline

 

Edited by RobertM54
add info
Filed: Country: Vietnam (no flag)
Timeline
Posted (edited)
3 minutes ago, RobertM54 said:

Withdrew the 2016 petition. New potential fiancée.   She will list a specific dating agency as her employer - how does the type of services matter?

If prostitution was a service provided as an escort, then it would matter.  The US Government will want to know if the dating service was a front for prostitution.  

Edited by aaron2020
Posted
6 minutes ago, RobertM54 said:

Withdrew the 2016 petition. New potential fiancée.   She will list a specific dating agency as her employer - how does the type of services matter?

I tried to delete my old timeline

 

Also I bet they’re going to be curious about IMBRA implications.

Posted
8 minutes ago, RobertM54 said:

Withdrew the 2016 petition. New potential fiancée.   She will list a specific dating agency as her employer - how does the type of services matter?

I tried to delete my old timeline

 

Is she paid for "dates", or is she working as an accountant/secretary/marketing rep for the agency - will make a huge difference. 

Filed: K-1 Visa Country: Ukraine
Timeline
Posted

Prostitution not a service provided by this agency. The women will rarely meet and then under agency supervision. 

IMBRA not an issue. Excellent  point though.  Introduced by a woman I did meet through the agency. She turned out to have recently married.

Posted
1 minute ago, RobertM54 said:

Prostitution not a service provided by this agency. The women will rarely meet and then under agency supervision. 

IMBRA not an issue. Excellent  point though.  Introduced by a woman I did meet through the agency. She turned out to have recently married.

What is her position/job description? What is the agency paying her to do exactly, if they are her employer?

Filed: K-1 Visa Country: Ukraine
Timeline
Posted
1 minute ago, Lemonslice said:

Is she paid for "dates", or is she working as an accountant/secretary/marketing rep for the agency - will make a huge difference. 

The website is a pay for chat site. She gets paid for her time in chat.

Why a huge difference?

I have met admin women from agencies. The only difference is that they are not hot. 

 

Filed: K-1 Visa Country: Ukraine
Timeline
Posted (edited)
41 minutes ago, Jorgedig said:

[removed by Moderation]

That was in specific response to:

"Is she paid for "dates", or is she working as an accountant/secretary/marketing rep for the agency - will make a huge difference. "

And my comment was: (why would you misquote me?)

I have met admin women from agencies. The only difference is that they are not hot. 

And I met her and developed a relationship with her outside the agency as I stated here:

"Introduced by a woman I did meet through the agency. "

 

Edited by TBoneTX
terms of service
Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Ecuador
Timeline
Posted

Several noncontributory/inflammatory posts have been removed, along with one quote thereof.

 

This thread began low in the water and is sinking rapidly.  The OP is to be as clear and objective as possible, and respondents are to respond objectively and nonjudgmentally, or this thread will be locked and administrative action applied.

06-04-2007 = TSC stamps postal return-receipt for I-129f.

06-11-2007 = NOA1 date (unknown to me).

07-20-2007 = Phoned Immigration Officer; got WAC#; where's NOA1?

09-25-2007 = Touch (first-ever).

09-28-2007 = NOA1, 23 days after their 45-day promise to send it (grrrr).

10-20 & 11-14-2007 = Phoned ImmOffs; "still pending."

12-11-2007 = 180 days; file is "between workstations, may be early Jan."; touches 12/11 & 12/12.

12-18-2007 = Call; file is with Division 9 ofcr. (bckgrnd check); e-prompt to shake it; touch.

12-19-2007 = NOA2 by e-mail & web, dated 12-18-07 (187 days; 201 per VJ); in mail 12/24/07.

01-09-2008 = File from USCIS to NVC, 1-4-08; NVC creates file, 1/15/08; to consulate 1/16/08.

01-23-2008 = Consulate gets file; outdated Packet 4 mailed to fiancee 1/27/08; rec'd 3/3/08.

04-29-2008 = Fiancee's 4-min. consular interview, 8:30 a.m.; much evidence brought but not allowed to be presented (consul: "More proof! Second interview! Bring your fiance!").

05-05-2008 = Infuriating $12 call to non-English-speaking consulate appointment-setter.

05-06-2008 = Better $12 call to English-speaker; "joint" interview date 6/30/08 (my selection).

06-30-2008 = Stokes Interrogations w/Ecuadorian (not USC); "wait 2 weeks; we'll mail her."

07-2008 = Daily calls to DOS: "currently processing"; 8/05 = Phoned consulate, got Section Chief; wrote him.

08-07-08 = E-mail from consulate, promising to issue visa "as soon as we get her passport" (on 8/12, per DHL).

08-27-08 = Phoned consulate (they "couldn't find" our file); visa DHL'd 8/28; in hand 9/1; through POE on 10/9 with NO hassles(!).

Posted

send me a tell, i think i might be able to help so that this thread does not devolve. I met my fiance through an agency as well, and we did file the proper IMBRA forms with our application. I have an idea of the agency also, however we do not have a large age gap as you are indicating. I can try to answer any questions in PMs if you wish.

RoC sent 10/30/21

NOA 11/16/21

Check Cashed 11/18/21

Biometrics Waived 01/19/2022

 

 

Beware the fury of a patient man.- John Dryden

Political attempts to require that others share your personal truths are, in their limit, dictatorships.- Neil deGrasse Tyson

Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Ukraine
Timeline
Posted
On ‎3‎/‎22‎/‎2019 at 12:19 AM, RobertM54 said:

Many woman make a living from their dating agency. Will that in itself disqualify her for a K-1 with a much older man?

NO, working for a dating agency will not disqualify her.  You asked if this will disqualify her for a K-1 with a much older man.  One of the problems you had with your previous k-1 submittal was a huge age difference.  Hopefully you are not in a similar scenario again.

 
Didn't find the answer you were looking for? Ask our VJ Immigration Lawyers.
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
- Back to Top -

Important Disclaimer: Please read carefully the Visajourney.com Terms of Service. If you do not agree to the Terms of Service you should not access or view any page (including this page) on VisaJourney.com. Answers and comments provided on Visajourney.com Forums are general information, and are not intended to substitute for informed professional medical, psychiatric, psychological, tax, legal, investment, accounting, or other professional advice. Visajourney.com does not endorse, and expressly disclaims liability for any product, manufacturer, distributor, service or service provider mentioned or any opinion expressed in answers or comments. VisaJourney.com does not condone immigration fraud in any way, shape or manner. VisaJourney.com recommends that if any member or user knows directly of someone involved in fraudulent or illegal activity, that they report such activity directly to the Department of Homeland Security, Immigration and Customs Enforcement. You can contact ICE via email at Immigration.Reply@dhs.gov or you can telephone ICE at 1-866-347-2423. All reported threads/posts containing reference to immigration fraud or illegal activities will be removed from this board. If you feel that you have found inappropriate content, please let us know by contacting us here with a url link to that content. Thank you.
×
×
  • Create New...