Ethiopian Airlines plane's black box recovered after deadly crash, but is reportedly damaged

[Nature Boy 2.0 8,370]

This is how the press is dishonest. They dont say it but they are implying the 737 returning for an engine problem is somehow unusual and related to the other problems. Airlines return to the airport for engine problems almost 2 times per month and in general about every 3 days

 

On a side note  not I did not know they had un-grounded them

 

Southwest Boeing 737 Max 8 plane makes emergency landing due to reported engine problem

[Unidentified 2,930]

1 hour ago, Nature Boy 2.0 said:

This is how the press is dishonest. They dont say it but they are implying the 737 returning for an engine problem is somehow unusual and related to the other problems. Airlines return to the airport for engine problems almost 2 times per month and in general about every 3 days

 

On a side note  not I did not know they had un-grounded them

 

Southwest Boeing 737 Max 8 plane makes emergency landing due to reported engine problem

They have not un-grounded them. In the US they're allowed to test and re-position the MAX aircrafts. 

[TBoneTX 45,310]

2 hours ago, Nature Boy 2.0 said:

Southwest Boeing 737 Max 8 plane makes emergency landing due to reported engine problem

If it's the one in Orlando, it apparently had no passengers, so it might have been a test flight.

[Voice of Reason 10,298]

11 hours ago, TBoneTX said:

If it's the one in Orlando, it apparently had no passengers, so it might have been a test flight.

No, it was a repo flight.  They were moving the plane to a short-term storage location.

 

And as NB2 says, terrible reporting, as the engine incident has nothing to do with the MCAS issues.  

 

https://www.cnn.com/2019/03/26/us/boeing-737-max-emergency-landing/index.html

 

Quote

It is not clear if Tuesday's emergency landing was related to suspected problems with the aircraft. An investigation into the crashes focuses on an automated anti-stall system and not engine problems.

Actually, it is VERY clear.  Even Stevie Wonder can see it’s not related.  Ole Reliable, that CNN...

[Nature Boy 2.0 8,370]

21 minutes ago, ALFKAD said:

No, it was a repo flight.  They were moving the plane to a short-term storage location.

 

And as NB2 says, terrible reporting, as the engine incident has nothing to do with the MCAS issues.  

 

https://www.cnn.com/2019/03/26/us/boeing-737-max-emergency-landing/index.html

 

Actually, it is VERY clear.  Even Stevie Wonder can see it’s not related.  Ole Reliable, that CNN...

Not only that I am sure the pilots were using an abundance of caution I would imagine management had told them to abort if the toilet makes a funny sound when flushing 

 

I bet those guys flying the plane empty thought they had an f15 LOL

[Voice of Reason 10,298]

Just now, Nature Boy 2.0 said:

Not only that I am sure the pilots were using an abundance of caution I would imagine management had told them to abort if the toilet makes a funny sound when flushing 

 

I bet those guys flying the plane empty thought they had an f15 LOL

If the toilet flushed on an empty plane and I was the pilot, I might beat the plane to the ground...

[Nature Boy 2.0 8,370]

1 minute ago, ALFKAD said:

If the toilet flushed on an empty plane and I was the pilot, I might beat the plane to the ground...

I am guessing on a empty flight they have 2 pilots and ????? Surely more than 2

 

It was just an example anyway.  Name some other warning that may occur that would not make you divert but might in a plane with some much attention on it right now 

[Voice of Reason 10,298]

2 hours ago, Nature Boy 2.0 said:

I am guessing on a empty flight they have 2 pilots and ????? Surely more than 2

 

It was just an example anyway.  Name some other warning that may occur that would not make you divert but might in a plane with some much attention on it right now 

I knew what you meant, I was playing with you.

 

But typically when a flight is flown like that, it falls under part 91, and only requires the 2 pilots.  Now if anyone rides along, say a couple mechanics or such, then they would have to add a flight attendant. 

[Nature Boy 2.0 8,370]

27 minutes ago, ALFKAD said:

I knew what you meant, I was playing with you.

 

But typically when a flight is flown like that, it falls under part 91, and only requires the 2 pilots.  Now if anyone rides along, say a couple mechanics or such, then they would have to add a flight attendant. 

Interesting info. Can one of the guys get up and get coffe etc

[TBoneTX 45,310]

11 hours ago, Nature Boy 2.0 said:

Can one of the guys get up and get coffe etc

That's women's work.

[ducks & runs for cover]

And how dare you sexistly presume that the mechanics are male?!

Edited March 28, 2019 by TBoneTX

[Voice of Reason 10,298]

On 3/27/2019 at 2:58 PM, Nature Boy 2.0 said:

Interesting info. Can one of the guys get up and get coffe etc

Pretty much.  No different from any other airplane ride, except that there is a little bit more room in a 737 than in a C-172.  

[Nature Boy 2.0 8,370]

14 minutes ago, ALFKAD said:

Pretty much.  No different from any other airplane ride, except that there is a little bit more room in a 737 than in a C-172.  

It only takes 1 person to fly a C 172..It takes 2 to legally to fly a 737. I was asking if there are only 2 people on the entire plane, can one pilot leave the cockpit for anyy period of time.

[Voice of Reason 10,298]

1 minute ago, Nature Boy 2.0 said:

It only takes 1 person to fly a C 172..It takes 2 to legally to fly a 737. I was asking if there are only 2 people on the entire plane, can one pilot leave the cockpit for anyy period of time.

Don’t see why both can’t step into the back and dance together, if they so desire?

[Nature Boy 2.0 8,370]

14 minutes ago, ALFKAD said:

Don’t see why both can’t step into the back and dance together, if they so desire?

Pilot-less cockpit cool 

[Voice of Reason 10,298]

24 minutes ago, Nature Boy 2.0 said:

Pilot-less cockpit cool 

Pilots are overrated.   Autonomous cockpits are where it's at!