Jump to content

63 posts in this topic

Recommended Posts

Filed: Lift. Cond. (pnd) Country: India
Timeline
Posted

For those of you who will be becoming citizens soon and would like to bring parents or adult children to the US in the future, please read "Proposed Restrictions on Parents" in the General Citizens Bringing Family Members to US forum. The new immigration bill that was approved by the Senate, while trying to resolve the illegal immigration problem, puts a severe cap on visas for parents, siblings and adult children of US citizens. The new guidelines put a greater emphasis on work/efficiency skills and English proficiency rather than on family ties. Based on the capping, parents and children may have to wait several years before they can get PR. What is more, if they do apply for PR, they maybe denied visit visas for that period until they have received the GC ( which could be greater than 5-10 years or more). For those of us, who think this is a serious concern, we cannot let the bill pas in the current form. My wife and I have already sent letters to Sentaor Kennedy, and several other people on the forum mentioned above are also doing so.

Just wanted to keep my friends on this forum updated as well.

Thanks,

c_mat

  • Replies 62
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Filed: Lift. Cond. (pnd) Country: India
Timeline
Posted
What you are not realizing is that your Family Members if competing for a job here in the US will have the advantage over some one who does not have ties to the US

But how could they compete if they are 60 or 70 years old and know minimal English? There's many such applicants who have parents in the above category.

Filed: Timeline
Posted

c_mat,

I have no problem with this change in emphasis.

I know a lot of immigrants - my present circle of friends and acquaintences is more immigrant that native born - and none of them necessarily want to be bring family members to the USA. Their immediate family is here, and they can visit their other family members back home as easily as I can visit my other family members on the opposite coast of the USA. (Which is not to say how easy it is, only that it's somewhat comparable.)

Nor do their families of the immigrants I know want to emmigrate to the USA. They are perfectly happy living in their own country. And I am not talking about 'rich, 1st-world' countries. They are suited to their own lifestyle, and recognize that they might not be suited to the American lifestyle. Happy to visit or be visited, but wouldn't want to live here.

True enough, though, close family ties are a key part of many cultures, and many families want to stay close. Which always causes me 2nd thoughts in such cases - why one member would want to break away, and then once they have broken away 'family reunification' suddenly becomes a major issue in their life. Is there a motive here somewhere to get one family member into the USA, and use that one to get the rest of the family here as well?

Yodrak

For those of you who will be becoming citizens soon and would like to bring parents or adult children to the US in the future, please read "Proposed Restrictions on Parents" in the General Citizens Bringing Family Members to US forum. The new immigration bill that was approved by the Senate, while trying to resolve the illegal immigration problem, puts a severe cap on visas for parents, siblings and adult children of US citizens. The new guidelines put a greater emphasis on work/efficiency skills and English proficiency rather than on family ties. Based on the capping, parents and children may have to wait several years before they can get PR. What is more, if they do apply for PR, they maybe denied visit visas for that period until they have received the GC ( which could be greater than 5-10 years or more). For those of us, who think this is a serious concern, we cannot let the bill pas in the current form. My wife and I have already sent letters to Sentaor Kennedy, and several other people on the forum mentioned above are also doing so.

Just wanted to keep my friends on this forum updated as well.

Thanks,

c_mat

Filed: Timeline
Posted

c_mat,

It is a legitimate objective of immigration policy to bring in people who can benefit the country and keep out people who would be detrimental to or a drag on the country.

I think it's safe to say that this is something that is a part of all countries' immigration policy. What will vary from country to country are the definitions of 'desireable' and 'undesireable' immigrants. And I also think it's safe to say that even though this immigration bill would de-emphasize family-based immigration, the USA would remain among the countries where family re-unification is a significant aspect of immigration policy.

Yodrak

What you are not realizing is that your Family Members if competing for a job here in the US will have the advantage over some one who does not have ties to the US

But how could they compete if they are 60 or 70 years old and know minimal English? There's many such applicants who have parents in the above category.

Filed: AOS (apr) Country: Peru
Timeline
Posted

To me the parents visitor visa proposal (so they can visit their children in the US for longer stays) is as fair as it can be. My parents have their life solved in Peru, considering their age, I would like to have them spend spring and summer here with me. Mine is a very big family, I would not dare to take my parents away from them, that would be really sad.

Jess

Entered US in Dec 20th 2006, K1 visa

Feb 24th 2007, Married

Conditional Resident since May 30th 2007

ROC 2009

Apr 10th, package sent to CSC

Apr 13th, package received (Day 3)

Apr 13th, NOA1 date (Day 3)

Apr 21st, Chech cashed (Day 11)

Apr 24th, NOA1 received in mail (Day 14)

May 15th, First Biometrics letter in mail (Day 35)

May 16th, Requested reschedule (Day 36)

Jun 5th, Second Biometrics letter in mail (Day 56)

Jun 15th, Biometrics (Day 66)

Jun 24th, Decision of Removal of Conditions: Approved!! (Day 75)

Jun 27th, Notice of Removal of Conditions and card production ordered via not so snail mail !YAY! (Day 78)

Filed: Country: Indonesia
Timeline
Posted

Personally, my parents does not want to move from Indonesia. As Yodrak mentioned above, they are not rich but they live comfortably. Both are retired and fortunately have good medical benefit. More importantly, they have family and friends (very close friends who are more like family than friends) around them. My siblings are all living close to them (not all in Indonesia but close enough to see each other frequently). If it were up to me, I would want them to be able to visit us for extended time and the new extended visa for parents will probably the better choice.

I-130

Jun 28 2004 : Received at NSC

Oct 25 2004 : Transferred to CSC

Oct 29 2004 : Received at CSC

Nov 8 2004 : Received response from CSC that my file is being requested & review will be done

Nov 10 2004 : Email & online status Approved

Nov 15 2004 : NOA 2 in mail

Dec 16 2004 : NVC assigns case number

Dec 20 2004 : NVC sent DS 3032 to beneficiary, copy of DS 3032 & I-864 fee bill to petitioner

Jan 3 2005 : Petitioner received copy of DS 3032 and I-864 fee bill. Post-marked Dec 23rd.

Jan 11 2005 : Beneficiary received DS 3032 in Indonesia

Jan 31 2005 : Sent DS 3032 to NVC

Feb 8, 2005 : NVC received DS 3032

Feb 21, 2005 : IV fee generated

Feb 25, 2005 : Sent I-864 fee bill

Feb 28, 2005 : I-864 fee bill delivered to St Louis

Mar 3, 2005 : IV fee bill received

Mar 7, 2005 : Sent IV fee bill

Mar 9, 2005 : IV fee bill delivered to St Louis

Mar 28, 2005 : I-864 fee credited against case.

April 6, 2005 : Received I-864 package

April 7, 2005 : Immigrant Visa fee credited against case.

April 11, 2005 : DS 230 is generated

Aug 12, 2005 : I-864 & DS 230 received by NVC

Sep 14, 2005 : RFE on I-864

Nov 3, 2005 : Checklist response received at NVC

Nov 25, 2005 : Case completion

Dec 9, 2005 : Police Cert requested from the Netherlands

Jan 12 2006 : Interview success - Approved !!

Jan 19 2006 : Visa & brown envelope picked up

Posted
But how could they compete if they are 60 or 70 years old and know minimal English? There's many such applicants who have parents in the above category.

That's the kind of immigrant the USA is probably wanting to keep out....Harsh as it sounds, what do thet have to offer the USA?

I think a cap would be unfair to parents who are old, widowed and ill and canot live alone in home country.

And why exactly should the USA worry about that???

Naturalization

Son's N-400 Timeline

08/14/2020 - Sent N-400 and I-912 waiver to TX lockbox

09/18/2020 - NOA via text

06/05/2021 - Notification of biometrics scheduled

09/17/2021 - Interview - decision cannot be made

11/24/2021 - Denial letter, 30 days to appeal

12/24/2021 - Appeal sent back with I-912 waiver

12/24/2021 - Motion to terminate deportation proceedings from 2013 filed

 

Filed: Timeline
Posted

It is not just about what immigrants can give US. It is about immigrants' family needs too.

But how could they compete if they are 60 or 70 years old and know minimal English? There's many such applicants who have parents in the above category.

That's the kind of immigrant the USA is probably wanting to keep out....Harsh as it sounds, what do thet have to offer the USA?

I think a cap would be unfair to parents who are old, widowed and ill and canot live alone in home country.

And why exactly should the USA worry about that???

Posted
It is not just about what immigrants can give US. It is about immigrants' family needs too.

The immigrants have already been the opportunity to come to the States. Why should the USA automatically allow them to bring everyone else too?

Naturalization

Son's N-400 Timeline

08/14/2020 - Sent N-400 and I-912 waiver to TX lockbox

09/18/2020 - NOA via text

06/05/2021 - Notification of biometrics scheduled

09/17/2021 - Interview - decision cannot be made

11/24/2021 - Denial letter, 30 days to appeal

12/24/2021 - Appeal sent back with I-912 waiver

12/24/2021 - Motion to terminate deportation proceedings from 2013 filed

 

Filed: Timeline
Posted (edited)

taco2,

Perhaps. But how many would really be in this narrow category?

In particular, how many would be truly alone, especially in countries where the culture is for extended families to take care of family members? Why does the task have to fall to the family member who has emigrated to the USA?

Yodrak

I think a cap would be unfair to parents who are old, widowed and ill and canot live alone in home country.
Edited by Yodrak
Posted
Why does the task have to fall to the family member who has emigrated to the USA?

Simple. Because of the money-tree that grows in every US citizens backyard.

my blog: http://immigrationlawreformblog.blogspot.com/

"It is the soldier, who salutes the flag, who serves beneath the flag, and whose coffin is draped by the flag, who allows the protester to burn the flag."

-- Charles M. Province

 
Didn't find the answer you were looking for? Ask our VJ Immigration Lawyers.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
- Back to Top -

Important Disclaimer: Please read carefully the Visajourney.com Terms of Service. If you do not agree to the Terms of Service you should not access or view any page (including this page) on VisaJourney.com. Answers and comments provided on Visajourney.com Forums are general information, and are not intended to substitute for informed professional medical, psychiatric, psychological, tax, legal, investment, accounting, or other professional advice. Visajourney.com does not endorse, and expressly disclaims liability for any product, manufacturer, distributor, service or service provider mentioned or any opinion expressed in answers or comments. VisaJourney.com does not condone immigration fraud in any way, shape or manner. VisaJourney.com recommends that if any member or user knows directly of someone involved in fraudulent or illegal activity, that they report such activity directly to the Department of Homeland Security, Immigration and Customs Enforcement. You can contact ICE via email at Immigration.Reply@dhs.gov or you can telephone ICE at 1-866-347-2423. All reported threads/posts containing reference to immigration fraud or illegal activities will be removed from this board. If you feel that you have found inappropriate content, please let us know by contacting us here with a url link to that content. Thank you.
×
×
  • Create New...