Democrat Eric Swalwell: If Gun Owners Defy ‘Assault Weapons’ Ban, ‘The Government Has Nukes’

[The Nature Boy 7,659]

Yup the MDL leadership has flipped. Funny not a word of this in the leftstream press

 

https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2018/11/16/eric-swalwell-if-gun-owners-defy-assault-weapons-ban-the-government-has-nukes/

[Cyberfx1024 7,980]

5 minutes ago, Marty Byrde said:

Yup the MDL leadership has flipped. Funny not a word of this in the leftstream press

 

https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2018/11/16/eric-swalwell-if-gun-owners-defy-assault-weapons-ban-the-government-has-nukes/

He was actually on Bill Maher on Friday night and sounded ok but a very Bay Area Liberal. So I was surprised when I saw that he said this because he sounded on tv a lot better than this. Al I can say is if he thinks he can do this then he can bring it. 

[Voice of Reason 10,298]

Well, his point is factually correct.  He’s just wrong if he thinks anyone would turn nukes on our own citizens.  It’s a pretty stupid conversation on both sides.

[Chris Duffy 1,257]

9 hours ago, Cyberfx1024 said:

He was actually on Bill Maher on Friday night and sounded ok but a very Bay Area Liberal. So I was surprised when I saw that he said this because he sounded on tv a lot better than this. Al I can say is if he thinks he can do this then he can bring it. 

For us Texans we just cant understand the thought process of a California Liberal, it just defies logic for the most part.

 

Not only on this subject but on their entire thought process

[Ban Hammer 13,558]

2 hours ago, Chris Duffy said:

For us Texans we just cant understand the thought process of a California Liberal, it just defies logic for the most part.

 

Not only on this subject but on their entire thought process

here's some translation help

[Dashinka 24,804]

This guy has floated the idea of gun confiscation as well from what I heard.  Also, he has mentioned possibly running for POTUS in 2020.  I know the MDL was so worried about Trump having his finger on the button, this little comment makes me worry a bit more.

[Boiler 46,125]

To be fair he is just talking to the gallery, when anybody tries to push him on the illogicality of his comments he folds.

[Randyandyuni 2,682]

what's his definition of an assault weapon?  That's the one that amuses me, pistol grip, bayonet lug and a 10+ round magazine? laughable

 

My 5 shot, Sako hunting rifles with zeiss scopes are far more accurate and deadly than any of these cheaply made AR15/AK47 clones flooding the streets, higher caliber, lethality, and distance. A surgeon's scalpel VS a sledge hammer.  

[Dashinka 24,804]

2 hours ago, Boiler said:

To be fair he is just talking to the gallery, when anybody tries to push him on the illogicality of his comments he folds.

Typical.

[Voice of Reason 10,298]

On 11/19/2018 at 10:28 AM, Randyandyuni said:

what's his definition of an assault weapon?  That's the one that amuses me, pistol grip, bayonet lug and a 10+ round magazine? laughable

 

My 5 shot, Sako hunting rifles with zeiss scopes are far more accurate and deadly than any of these cheaply made AR15/AK47 clones flooding the streets, higher caliber, lethality, and distance. A surgeon's scalpel VS a sledge hammer.  

Shhhhh, don't tell the masses our secrets!!

[Ban Hammer 13,558]

On 11/19/2018 at 9:28 AM, Randyandyuni said:

what's his definition of an assault weapon?  That's the one that amuses me, pistol grip, bayonet lug and a 10+ round magazine? laughable

 

My 5 shot, Sako hunting rifles with zeiss scopes are far more accurate and deadly than any of these cheaply made AR15/AK47 clones flooding the streets, higher caliber, lethality, and distance. A surgeon's scalpel VS a sledge hammer.  

what caliber?

[Randyandyuni 2,682]

.308 and 375 H&H

[Voice of Reason 10,298]

11 hours ago, Randyandyuni said:

.308 and 375 H&H

How does the 375 handle?  Range?  I assume it's not as flat nor as far as the .308?

[Boiler 46,125]

I have a Tikka in .308 starts dropping fast beyond 400.

[Merle 458]

So do you nuke a single gun owner's house? Seems like there would be a lot of non gun owner collateral damage. Or do you gather all the gun owners up and nuke them as a group out in a desolate location?