Climate contrarian uncovers scientific error, upends major ocean warming study

[The Nature Boy 7,659]

https://www.sandiegouniontribune.com/news/environment/sd-me-climate-study-error-20181113-story.html

[Voice of Reason 10,298]

“Ruh-roh Rhaggy!!”

 

If only someone had been so kind as to have stuck a thermometer in the oceans about 50 million years ago, we might know without having to guess.

 

Remember when eggs were good for you?  Then they weren’t?  And now they are again?  Or water... ermagherd, you had to drink QUARTS of water in the army to survive.  That is, until a study a few years back concluded that too much water could kill you.

[TBoneTX 45,267]

What mystifies me is how the error-laden paper made it past the peer and internal review processes.

[Neonred 3,562]

17 hours ago, Satisfied said:

“Ruh-roh Rhaggy!!”

 

If only someone had been so kind as to have stuck a thermometer in the oceans about 50 million years ago, we might know without having to guess.

 

 

But wait a minute.  Since then there has been 5 ice ages, each followed  by a period of global warming.  None of which man had anything to do with.

[Dashinka 24,489]

I love this part.

 

"According to the most recent IPCC report, climate emissions need to be cut by 20 percent by 2030 and then zeroed out by 2075 to keep warming from exceeding 2 degrees Celsius (3.6 degrees Fahrenheit) above preindustrial levels."

 

How are they going to zero out all emissions (I am assuming they are talking about CO2) by 2075 without eliminating all life on earth?

 

5 hours ago, TBoneTX said:

What mystifies me is how the error-laden paper made it past the peer and internal review processes.

It was already settled science (apparently a vote was taken by secret ballot), so no need to peer review any story that promotes the narrative.

[Cyberfx1024 7,980]

5 hours ago, TBoneTX said:

What mystifies me is how the error-laden paper made it past the peer and internal review processes.

Yo Simian.... don't you know that errors don't matter when grant money is at stake? 

[TBoneTX 45,267]

4 hours ago, Bill & Katya said:

no need to peer review any story that promotes the narrative.

Probably expedited for publication for this very reason.

4 hours ago, Cyberfx1024 said:

errors don't matter when grant money is at stake

"Who is buried in Grant money's tomb?"

[jg121783 3,915]

You guys are all full of crazy conspiracy theories. You probably even believe the sun has an impact on the Earths climate. Don't you know the science is settled and the sun has no impact on the climate. It's all suvs and cow farts.

[Randyandyuni 2,682]

2 hours ago, jg121783 said:

You guys are all full of crazy conspiracy theories. You probably even believe the sun has an impact on the Earths climate. Don't you know the science is settled and the sun has no impact on the climate. It's all suvs and cow farts.

couple of them farts are mine ...

[The Nature Boy 7,659]

16 hours ago, TBoneTX said:

What mystifies me is how the error-laden paper made it past the peer and internal review processes.

The same reason Dr Ford was celebrated for her, obviously false accusations by her militant feminist university. The agenda is more important than the truth when trying to save the poo peasants from themselves 

[Voice of Reason 10,298]

I remember being berated here in CEHST a year ago when I said that logic defies the current global climate change theories.  Multiple ice ages prior to man being around, the size of the cosmos vs. our little planet... I was mocked because I am not a scientist, therefore I cannot know what scientists know.

 

I just looked again, and Miami is still above water.

[Póg mo 1,749]

Sweet, more confirmation bias. Climate change is a hoax, because a small group of scientists screwed up. What more proof would you want?  Did it ever occur to anyone that peer review, isn't the end of the process? Nah, echo chambers are too much fun, to bother with pesky facts.

Best of luck disproving all the other studies.

[Boiler 45,468]

We have had a nice couple of days of Global Warming, looks like more snow on Saturday.

[TBoneTX 45,267]

"Throw a Communist out the window and he comes back in through the front door as an Environmentalist."

[Dashinka 24,489]

11 hours ago, Póg mo said:

Sweet, more confirmation bias. Climate change is a hoax, because a small group of scientists screwed up. What more proof would you want?  Did it ever occur to anyone that peer review, isn't the end of the process? Nah, echo chambers are too much fun, to bother with pesky facts.

Best of luck disproving all the other studies.

Has anyone here or anywhere in the general population of those skeptical of human induced global warming ever said that the earth's climate does not change or fluctuate?  Btw, they want to zero out all emissions by 2075, are all the manmade climate change true believers going to be the first to jump into the open pit?

20 hours ago, jg121783 said:

You guys are all full of crazy conspiracy theories. You probably even believe the sun has an impact on the Earths climate. Don't you know the science is settled and the sun has no impact on the climate. It's all suvs and cow farts.

I am so amazed that these learned "supposed" scientists can ignore, or downplay the effect of the Sun.  Here is an example of one that doesn't ignore that big fireball in the sky.  Of course she must be wrong since she is a mathematics professor.

 

Professor Valentina Zharkova explains and confirms why a "Super" Grand Solar Minimum is upon us

 

Professor Valentina Zharkova gave a presentation of her Climate and the Solar Magnetic Field hypothesis at the Global Warming Policy Foundation in October, 2018. The information she unveiled should shake/wake you up.

Zharkova was one of the few that correctly predicted solar cycle 24 would be weaker than cycle 23 - only 2 out of 150 models predicted this.

Her models have run at a 93% accuracy and her findings suggest a Super Grand Solar Minimum is on the cards beginning 2020 and running for 350-400 years.

The last time we had a little ice age only two magnetic fields of the sun went out of phase.

This time, all four magnetic fields are going out of phase.

Here's a great (and relatively brief) video explanation of Zharkova's presentation from Diamond and Lee Wheelbarger:

 

https://www.sott.net/article/400195-Professor-Valentina-Zharkova-explains-and-confirms-why-a-Super-Grand-Solar-Minimum-is-upon-us