DEMOCRATS USE MASS SHOOTING AT PITTSBURGH SYNAGOGUE TO DEMAND GUN CONTROL

[Boiler 45,525]

Presumably people get shot?

[Voice of Reason 10,298]

20 minutes ago, Unidentified said:

Okay let me rephrase that: every time there's a shooting, nothing happens. 

Perhaps you can link us to the stats you are talking about? Because I  fairly certain that the arrest rate for shootings is fairly high, which is about the opposite of nothing.

[TBoneTX 45,308]

Standard procedure from the media again, suppressing a story by failure to report:

https://www.rushlimbaugh.com/daily/2018/10/31/pittsburgh-hospital-workers-welcome-president-trump/

The link to the original story is at bottom of Rush's piece.

[Dashinka 24,512]

10 hours ago, Unidentified said:

Okay let me rephrase that: every time there's a shooting, nothing happens. 

So what do you want to happen? 

[lierre 224]

10 hours ago, Bill & Katya said:

So what do you want to happen? 

 

For me personally, I am for making guns safer and for more difficult access to those with capability to shoot 50+ people in under 10 minutes. And I am also open to legislation requiring gun owners to use safes when their guns are not in use, much like how  law enforcement officers in countries like Germany are required to do so.

 

I speak as a person who only owns a Walther PPK.

 

 

[Boiler 45,525]

So how many time can you shoot your PPK in 10 minutes?

[lierre 224]

5 minutes ago, Boiler said:

So how many time can you shoot your PPK in 10 minutes?

 

How is that relevant?

 

 

 

 

[Boiler 45,525]

1 minute ago, lierre said:

 

How is that relevant?

 

 

 

 

Somebody mentioned in an earlier post it was.

[lierre 224]

2 minutes ago, Boiler said:

Somebody mentioned in an earlier post it was.

 

???

 

 

 

[Randyandyuni 2,682]

Your walther and an Ar15 work the same way, both are semi-automatic, the rifle is more accurate the pistol allows you to close with your target relative easier, 1 pull equals one shot, people tend to run from bullets rather than towards, so both are relatively safe to the shooter unless matched in firepower or someone can resist human nature and face the threat unarmed.

 

Your arguement should be about magazine capacity, your walther can get a magazine with 11-12 rounds I believe, pistols are easy to reload, so the sustained rate of fire would be pretty close. In the absence of a credible threat someone could expect to get off 30+ aimed shots in 2 minutes with either weapon. 

[lierre 224]

9 minutes ago, Randyandyuni said:

Your walther and an Ar15 work the same way, both are semi-automatic, the rifle is more accurate the pistol allows you to close with your target relative easier, 1 pull equals one shot, people tend to run from bullets rather than towards, so both are relatively safe to the shooter unless matched in firepower or someone can resist human nature and face the threat unarmed.

 

Your arguement should be about magazine capacity, your walther can get a magazine with 11-12 rounds I believe, pistols are easy to reload, so the sustained rate of fire would be pretty close. In the absence of a credible threat someone could expect to get off 30+ aimed shots in 2 minutes with either weapon. 

 

Ha. That is why I mentioned what gun I owned. I’m clearly just a pistol owner. Yes, it’s only 12.

 

 

 

 

[Boiler 45,525]

9 minutes ago, lierre said:

 

Ha. That is why I mentioned what gun I owned. I’m clearly just a pistol owner. Yes, it’s only 12.

 

 

 

 

Why do you need to shoot 12 people?

[lierre 224]

14 minutes ago, Boiler said:

Why do you need to shoot 12 people?

 

Again, how is this relevant to the discussion?

 

Edit: I’ve got a feeling this leads to nowhere

Edited November 1, 2018 by lierre

[Boiler 45,525]

1 hour ago, lierre said:

 

For me personally, I am for making guns safer and for more difficult access to those with capability to shoot 50+ people in under 10 minutes. And I am also open to legislation requiring gun owners to use safes when their guns are not in use, much like how  law enforcement officers in countries like Germany are required to do so.

 

I speak as a person who only owns a Walther PPK.

 

 

[The Nature Boy 7,659]

1 hour ago, lierre said:

 

For me personally, I am for making guns safer and for more difficult access to those with capability to shoot 50+ people in under 10 minutes. And I am also open to legislation requiring gun owners to use safes when their guns are not in use, much like how  law enforcement officers in countries like Germany are required to do so.

 

I speak as a person who only owns a Walther PPK.

 

 

50 in 10 minutes is only 5 a minute. They would be most any gun sold in the usa. Most people calling for gun laws have no clue about guns.

Edited November 2, 2018 by Marty Byrde