221g help with it please with K1

[HP+IC 292]

5 minutes ago, YulenkaF said:

No in the list of documents is "extract". And after interview they asked "FULL EXTRACT". ))) I even did not know that is it before that ))

There are different forms, at least a short one and an extended one. They want a most extended form possible in your case. Your attorney should know.

[Ksenia_O 696]

1 minute ago, YulenkaF said:

thank you.

I am sure that I am not a single person who used agencies.

Otheways why consulting of immigrant attorney in Kiev costs 250euro and there is a line till 2nd of october....

Hah?....Can't really explain that. I've thought everybody has already learnt - never lie to a government or any Embassy. Or even better - no lies at all, but it's in a perfect world  - I get it.

 

All info gets recorded and stays in the system. Plus - GB, USA, Australia, New Zealand and Canada share the date.  You misrepresent yourself before one Embassy - you are pretty much done then with other four. The same with any EU Embassies.

 

But seems like there will always be people who believe agencies or an immigration attorney can make a miracle.. Which is obviously  not true. 

 

Anyway, girl, once again -  good luck to you and hope you'll have your approval after your provide the Embassy with the document. 

[YulenkaF 42]

13 minutes ago, HP+IC said:

Yeah, your situation is very complicated and different from mine. Marriage, kids, I petitioned for divorce, got my decree with no need to have it subsequently registered as it was after 2010. Essentially, one document from court. What I would have done in your situation: get your attorney draft an affidavit chronologically describing what happened in which consequence and why. If he is an  адвокат, ask him/her to make it on his/her official letterhed and attest a personal stamp along with a 'wet signature'. And enclose all that stuff. I have read about complicated cases where the CO put the applicant in AP and request a judicial review or something from the USCIS lawyers. It takes time but it is well worth it. The CO will have their answers and you will not look doubtful to them.

interesting idea....by the way...

[HP+IC 292]

3 minutes ago, YulenkaF said:

interesting idea....by the way...

Comes from a lawyer  so get your extract, meet your attorney, have all those weeds sorted out and documents brought into line, get a clear affidavit, read it 3 times, look through your documents 3 times and only submit when you see a solid proof

Edited September 26, 2018 by HP+IC

[YulenkaF 42]

14 minutes ago, HP+IC said:

There are different forms, at least a short one and an extended one. They want a most extended form possible in your case. Your attorney should know.

yes. I have it already. Thanks )

[YulenkaF 42]

13 minutes ago, Ksenia_O said:

Hah?....Can't really explain that. I've thought everybody has already learnt - never lie to a government or any Embassy. Or even better - no lies at all, but it's in a perfect world  - I get it.

 

All info gets recorded and stays in the system. Plus - GB, USA, Australia, New Zealand and Canada share the date.  You misrepresent yourself before one Embassy - you are pretty much done then with other four. The same with any EU Embassies.

 

But seems like there will always be people who believe agencies or an immigration attorney can make a miracle.. Which is obviously  not true. 

 

Anyway, girl, once again -  good luck to you and hope you'll have your approval after your provide the Embassy with the document. 

you are right. Believe or not few years ago I swear never to come back to that embassy... You see how  destiny plays ... ))))))))))😀

Now I am ready for all for my best ever man )))

[YulenkaF 42]

5 minutes ago, HP+IC said:

Comes from a lawyer

I think I will do it. will see what will be.  It sounds great to me.

Ok.

But maybe someone knows how is possible to mitigate circumstances about lie? 

Still. If without blaming...there has to be something.. letter or something like that?

[HP+IC 292]

1 minute ago, YulenkaF said:

I think I will do it. will see what will be.  It sounds great to me.

Ok.

But maybe someone knows how is possible to mitigate circumstances about lie? 

Still. If without blaming...there has to be something.. letter or something like that?

This is purely US immigration attorney's piece of cake. To my understanding, you misrepresent and you get an action, say a ban. Maybe you can appeal, maybe file a waiver (if legally possible) next time you apply for a visa, maybe wait if the ban disqualifies you for a finite period of time. Maybe misrepresenting may end in ban for life, if there are conditions as to gravity. This should be clearly defined by US immigration law. But if you get not an action but a record in your file, which you have already got for sure, it may impede your subsequent applications for all kinds of visas. Which means you must be very well prepared and 10 times better than simply eligible with your documents and interviews.

[YulenkaF 42]

5 minutes ago, HP+IC said:

This is purely US immigration attorney's piece of cake. To my understanding, you misrepresent and you get an action, say a ban. Maybe you can appeal, maybe file a waiver (if legally possible) next time you apply for a visa, maybe wait if the ban disqualifies you for a finite period of time. Maybe misrepresenting may end in ban for life, if there are conditions as to gravity. This should be clearly defined by US immigration law. But if you get not an action but a record in your file, which you have already got for sure, it may impede your subsequent applications for all kinds of visas. Which means you must be very well prepared and 10 times better than simply eligible with your documents and interviews.

but they told me "give us this document and you do not have to come to embassy again anymore".

Is it ban?

Logically there are no chance to have once more interview...

Is it possible to have a ban if I said not correct information about my marriage status?  It was the only which was not correct in all dialog.

PS: About attorneys -totally agree

 

Edited September 26, 2018 by YulenkaF

[HP+IC 292]

All possible actions from American side (including whether or not ban may be imposed) shall be discussed with your American legal representative. We do not have that specific qualifications and knowledge. I mean, after your Ukrainian attorney fixes all divorce and ZAGS bugs and supplies an affidavit, have your American attorney look into it from misrep point of view. Then s/he may want to shed some light upon whether or not you qualify for a ban or something 

[YulenkaF 42]

35 minutes ago, HP+IC said:

All possible actions from American side (including whether or not ban may be imposed) shall be discussed with your American legal representative. We do not have that specific qualifications and knowledge. I mean, after your Ukrainian attorney fixes all divorce and ZAGS bugs and supplies an affidavit, have your American attorney look into it from misrep point of view. Then s/he may want to shed some light upon whether or not you qualify for a ban or something 

thank you 

[geowrian 22,338]

A misrepresentation bar is permanent, but can be waived via an I-601. When AP completes, if they refuse the visa due to this inadmissibility, it should include a letter stating that you are eligible to apply for an I-601 hardship waiver. ETA: ~1 year or so.

 

Maybe I missed it, but was the tourist visa approved? If not, it may not have been deemed a material misrepresentation since you were denied the visa anyway.

It certainly is cause for them not to believe anything that is not also be proven via evidence moving forward, though.

[HP+IC 292]

13 minutes ago, geowrian said:

A misrepresentation bar is permanent, but can be waived via an I-601. When AP completes, if they refuse the visa due to this inadmissibility, it should include a letter stating that you are eligible to apply for an I-601 hardship waiver. ETA: ~1 year or so.

 

Maybe I missed it, but was the tourist visa approved? If not, it may not have been deemed a material misrepresentation since you were denied the visa anyway.

It certainly is cause for them not to believe anything that is not also be proven via evidence moving forward, though.

OP says it was denied

[YulenkaF 42]

38 minutes ago, geowrian said:

A misrepresentation bar is permanent, but can be waived via an I-601. When AP completes, if they refuse the visa due to this inadmissibility, it should include a letter stating that you are eligible to apply for an I-601 hardship waiver. ETA: ~1 year or so.

 

Maybe I missed it, but was the tourist visa approved? If not, it may not have been deemed a material misrepresentation since you were denied the visa anyway.

It certainly is cause for them not to believe anything that is not also be proven via evidence moving forward, though.

you mean if they did not write in my paper 221g about misrepresentation they do not mean it in my case?

Do I understand right?

Tourist visa was denied

 

[geowrian 22,338]

1 minute ago, YulenkaF said:

you mean if they did not write in my paper 221g about misrepresentation they do not mean it in my case?

Do I understand right?

Tourist visa was denied

The CO can make a misrepresentation finding at any time still. You won't know until AP completes.

Being denied is probably for the best...it may not be a material misrepresentation as a result.