Jump to content
Chris & Pam

Attn. Writers & English Teachers

 Share

19 posts in this topic

Recommended Posts

Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Ecuador
Timeline

The letter seems to presume that the visa will be granted.

The closing refers to "our" application.  It is hers alone.

Poor ideas, both.

06-04-2007 = TSC stamps postal return-receipt for I-129f.

06-11-2007 = NOA1 date (unknown to me).

07-20-2007 = Phoned Immigration Officer; got WAC#; where's NOA1?

09-25-2007 = Touch (first-ever).

09-28-2007 = NOA1, 23 days after their 45-day promise to send it (grrrr).

10-20 & 11-14-2007 = Phoned ImmOffs; "still pending."

12-11-2007 = 180 days; file is "between workstations, may be early Jan."; touches 12/11 & 12/12.

12-18-2007 = Call; file is with Division 9 ofcr. (bckgrnd check); e-prompt to shake it; touch.

12-19-2007 = NOA2 by e-mail & web, dated 12-18-07 (187 days; 201 per VJ); in mail 12/24/07.

01-09-2008 = File from USCIS to NVC, 1-4-08; NVC creates file, 1/15/08; to consulate 1/16/08.

01-23-2008 = Consulate gets file; outdated Packet 4 mailed to fiancee 1/27/08; rec'd 3/3/08.

04-29-2008 = Fiancee's 4-min. consular interview, 8:30 a.m.; much evidence brought but not allowed to be presented (consul: "More proof! Second interview! Bring your fiance!").

05-05-2008 = Infuriating $12 call to non-English-speaking consulate appointment-setter.

05-06-2008 = Better $12 call to English-speaker; "joint" interview date 6/30/08 (my selection).

06-30-2008 = Stokes Interrogations w/Ecuadorian (not USC); "wait 2 weeks; we'll mail her."

07-2008 = Daily calls to DOS: "currently processing"; 8/05 = Phoned consulate, got Section Chief; wrote him.

08-07-08 = E-mail from consulate, promising to issue visa "as soon as we get her passport" (on 8/12, per DHL).

08-27-08 = Phoned consulate (they "couldn't find" our file); visa DHL'd 8/28; in hand 9/1; through POE on 10/9 with NO hassles(!).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: K-1 Visa Country: Wales
Timeline

My CO was not in uniform.

 

Is it normal for them to be in uniform?

“If you know the enemy and know yourself, you need not fear the result of a hundred battles. If you know yourself but not the enemy, for every victory gained you will also suffer a defeat. If you know neither the enemy nor yourself, you will succumb in every battle.”

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: Other Country: China
Timeline
5 hours ago, carmel34 said:

From all the many embassy and consulate interview reviews I have read on VJ, I would suggest not sending this letter at all.  The purpose of the interview is to ask the beneficiary questions about the relationship, not the petitioner, so that the CO can decide if the relationship is credible, if the beneficiary is trying to enter the US solely to get citizenship, not to be in a relationship, i.e., to commit fraud.  This is why petitioners are not allowed in the interview in most countries.  rch and stories and reviews posted on VJ.    

Correct in your first statement but not about why the petitioner isn't allowed in the interview.  The primary reason is that there simply isn't room.  

 

It's also important to note that the vast majority of the decision about the visa is made BEFORE the interview.  The interview can turn in either direction but seldom turns at all.  The file is reviewed BEFORE the interview and in approvals, the interview CONFIRMS the decision already made.  There ARE some exceptions and anomalies but for the most part, that's how it is.

Facts are cheap...knowing how to use them is precious...
Understanding the big picture is priceless. Anonymous

Google Who is Pushbrk?

A Warning to Green Card Holders About Voting

http://www.visajourney.com/forums/topic/606646-a-warning-to-green-card-holders-about-voting/

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 9/21/2018 at 11:16 PM, Boiler said:

My CO was not in uniform.

 

Is it normal for them to be in uniform?

I don't believe so Boiler.  That's why I wrote "most of the time, those in uniform receive that credit, but I do realize that those who serve in a civil capacity also make sacrifices on our behalf."  Specifically mentioning "civil" to draw attention to those out of uniform.  It is a shameless attempt to curry favor.  

 

In light of what some have mentioned, I'm inclined to not submit the letter.  As pushbrk said, the interview is only to confirm the decision already made.  

 

Better to leave well enough alone.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 
Didn't find the answer you were looking for? Ask our VJ Immigration Lawyers.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
- Back to Top -

Important Disclaimer: Please read carefully the Visajourney.com Terms of Service. If you do not agree to the Terms of Service you should not access or view any page (including this page) on VisaJourney.com. Answers and comments provided on Visajourney.com Forums are general information, and are not intended to substitute for informed professional medical, psychiatric, psychological, tax, legal, investment, accounting, or other professional advice. Visajourney.com does not endorse, and expressly disclaims liability for any product, manufacturer, distributor, service or service provider mentioned or any opinion expressed in answers or comments. VisaJourney.com does not condone immigration fraud in any way, shape or manner. VisaJourney.com recommends that if any member or user knows directly of someone involved in fraudulent or illegal activity, that they report such activity directly to the Department of Homeland Security, Immigration and Customs Enforcement. You can contact ICE via email at Immigration.Reply@dhs.gov or you can telephone ICE at 1-866-347-2423. All reported threads/posts containing reference to immigration fraud or illegal activities will be removed from this board. If you feel that you have found inappropriate content, please let us know by contacting us here with a url link to that content. Thank you.
×
×
  • Create New...