Brett Kavanaugh’s Mother Presided Over Foreclosure Hearing Involving Accuser’s Parents

[The Nature Boy 7,659]

8 minutes ago, Boiler said:

I will await with interest the deep delving into the past of major Dems.

 

I would imagine there are quite a few who are currently concerned.

 

Well those who have not been outed, yet.

I dont know one person right now who would qualify.

[Voice of Reason 10,298]

55 minutes ago, Marty Byrde said:

I dont know one person right now who would qualify.

Keith *cough* Ellison *cough cough*

 

Shhhhh....

[Voice of Reason 10,298]

Brings out some interesting points on the new accuser and her accusations...

 

https://www.dailywire.com/news/36229/10-serious-problems-new-accusations-against-ryan-saavedra?utm_source=facebook&utm_medium=social&utm_content=062316-news&utm_campaign=dwbrand

[The Nature Boy 7,659]

1 hour ago, Satisfied said:

Brings out some interesting points on the new accuser and her accusations...

 

https://www.dailywire.com/news/36229/10-serious-problems-new-accusations-against-ryan-saavedra?utm_source=facebook&utm_medium=social&utm_content=062316-news&utm_campaign=dwbrand

I hope they make them testify under oath and then charge them with perjury

[Cyberfx1024 7,980]

3 hours ago, Satisfied said:

Brings out some interesting points on the new accuser and her accusations...

 

https://www.dailywire.com/news/36229/10-serious-problems-new-accusations-against-ryan-saavedra?utm_source=facebook&utm_medium=social&utm_content=062316-news&utm_campaign=dwbrand

That article brought forward some very good points as you stated previously that need to be seriously addressed by people about her and not Kavanaugh. If people that were really close with her in college and whom she shared intimate details with have said that she did not inform them about this incident then it is weird. Usually if something outrageous like this happened in college then those people would tell their intimate friends like "ugh do you know what Brett tried to do last night at the party?". But no nothing of that nature has come up at all. So I don't believe this at all. 

[Voice of Reason 10,298]

2 hours ago, Marty Byrde said:

I hope they make them testify under oath and then charge them with perjury

I do too.  If she’s guilty of perjury, she needs to spend time in jail, period.

[Voice of Reason 10,298]

Yeah, I am having doubts myself as to the veracity of her story.

 

http://www.shadolsonshow.com/2018/09/20/bombshell-blasey-fords-hs-yearbooks-brag-of-drunken-promiscuity-54-sex-partners-before-college/

 

 

 

43 minutes ago, Cyberfx1024 said:

That article brought forward some very good points as you stated previously that need to be seriously addressed by people about her and not Kavanaugh. If people that were really close with her in college and whom she shared intimate details with have said that she did not inform them about this incident then it is weird. Usually if something outrageous like this happened in college then those people would tell their intimate friends like "ugh do you know what Brett tried to do last night at the party?". But no nothing of that nature has come up at all. So I don't believe this at all. 

 

[Póg mo 1,749]

So apparently Kavanaugh's ex roommate supports the integrity of the second accuser, but naturally this guy is also Democrat, with his hand out for money,  etc yada yada yada. 

 

[TBoneTX 45,542]

Hopefully, the American people see through all this.

And don't most folks consider that, sometimes, people simply make stuff up?

[Voice of Reason 10,298]

2 hours ago, Póg mo said:

So apparently Kavanaugh's ex roommate supports the integrity of the second accuser, but naturally this guy is also Democrat, with his hand out for money,  etc yada yada yada. 

 

I find this situation a bit hard to believe,  must admit.  If he’s guilty, so be it.  But I’m guessing he’s not, and this will only serve to keep him off the SC, which was the goal all along.  Fiction, sometimes, causes more damage than fact...

 

[Dashinka 24,600]

4 hours ago, Póg mo said:

So apparently Kavanaugh's ex roommate supports the integrity of the second accuser, but naturally this guy is also Democrat, with his hand out for money,  etc yada yada yada. 

 

Would that be surprising given the way the Democrats play politics?  Remember Bernie?

[Póg mo 1,749]

3 hours ago, Bill & Katya said:

Would that be surprising given the way the Democrats play politics?  Remember Bernie?

I completely disagree with with what you are saying, but I  find it interesting how for someone who uses the both sides are guilty argument again and again, suddenly  the Democrats are doing something particularly machiavellian, and Republicans are suddenly not even responsible for anything. 😀😀

Edited September 25, 2018 by Póg mo

[Cyberfx1024 7,980]

8 hours ago, Póg mo said:

So apparently Kavanaugh's ex roommate supports the integrity of the second accuser, but naturally this guy is also Democrat, with his hand out for money,  etc yada yada yada. 

 

Since the 2nd Accuser's BFF in college is saying that she NEVER heard of this accusation at all. So I doubt this will hold up at all. 

[Dashinka 24,600]

1 hour ago, Póg mo said:

I completely disagree with with what you are saying, but I  find it interesting how for someone who uses the both sides are guilty argument again and again, suddenly  the Democrats are doing something particularly machiavellian, and Republicans are suddenly not even responsible for anything. 😀😀

The Democrats are practicing dirty politics here which is quite evident, sitting on an unsubstantiated accusation for a period and waiting until the last minute to pull it out, then when that one starts to falter, the Democrat lawyers hang out with another women for six days and now all of the sudden she sort of remembers someone saying that Kavanaugh showed her his junk thirty some years ago when she was very drunk (can you say hearsay).  Now that the second unsubstantiated accusation is also faltering (his former roommate acting as a character witness for the accuser is not direct evidence), heck the NYTimes wouldn't even print this story, but the Dems found someone to air it, so of course we will get more calls for delay from the usual suspects.  Now there is a story that if the hearings on Thursday actually go forward, the Democratic women on the committee do not plan to ask any questions, they only plan to grandstand with their own self-serving statements.  This is a Democrat made circus and they do not care who they hurt as their motto is "Party First" now.  I am actually ashamed to say I actually voted for some Democrats in the past and although I do say that all politicians are guilty of lying or misleading folks and playing politics, the GOP has nothing on the Democrats, so there are degrees.  I know a Democrat party loyalist will not see it, but it is clearly evident.

 

By the way, do you know that Dr. Ford has made money from the company that make RU486?  Hmm, I wonder if she has a conflict of interest since the Dems have been telling everyone that if Kavanaugh gets on the court, Roe v. Wade will be immediately overturned.  Shen may have decided making money off abortion was worth any damage with her accusation that even her best friend does not collaborate.

 

 

 

 

[Voice of Reason 10,298]

Here's the timeline:
1982 - Something may or may not have happened with another 2 (or 4) teenagers at a party, she cannot remember who threw the party, where the party was held, who she was with or how she got home. She was drinking and said nothing to anyone.
1983,
1984,
1985,
1986,
1987,
1988,
1989,
1990,
1991,
1992,
1993,
1994,
1995,
1996,
1997,
1998,
1999,
2000,
2001,
2002... She said nothing.
July 25, 2003: President George W. Bush nominated Kavanaugh to the United States Court of Appeals for the D.C Circuit... She said nothing.
2004,
2005... She said nothing.
May 11, 2006: The United States Senate Committee on the Judiciary recommended confirmation. Kavanaugh subsequently confirmed by the United States Senate... She said nothing.
June 1, 2006: Kavanaugh sworn in by Justice Anthony Kennedy... She said nothing.
2007,
2008,
2009,
2010,
2011... She said nothing.
2012... She remembered 'something' happened in 1982, yet doesn't name Kavanaugh, still said nothing to authorities.
2013,
2014,
2015,
2016,
2017 - becomes an anti-trump activist.
2018 - now 36 years later, with Kavanaugh's SCOTUS confirmation looming, she pens an anonymous letter with grave accusations against Kavanaugh regarding foggy circumstance that occurred while they were both minors, then reveals herself and DEMANDS an FBI investigation before testifying to her incredible allegations?
Who does she think she is?