Jump to content
Seed

Wife's Friend Denied Tourist Visa Twice to Visit US from Thailand

51 posts in this topic

Recommended Posts

Posted
3 minutes ago, SusieQQQ said:

The table I reference d before https://travel.state.gov/content/dam/visas/Statistics/AnnualReports/FY2017AnnualReport/FY17AnnualReport -TableXVII.pdf is non-immigrant visas issued by nationality, not by post. So they are all Thailand nationals. And to reiterate again, they are ALL actually issued. Both these points are clearly indicated in the headings. 

DOH!!! =_= That' s what I get for relying on memory. I've seen these reports a thousand times.

Timelines:

ROC:

Spoiler

7/27/20: Sent forms to Dallas lockbox, 7/30/20: Received by USCIS, 8/10 NOA1 electronic notification received, 8/1/ NOA1 hard copy received

AOS:

Spoiler

AOS (I-485 + I-131 + I-765):

9/25/17: sent forms to Chicago, 9/27/17: received by USCIS, 10/4/17: NOA1 electronic notification received, 10/10/17: NOA1 hard copy received. Social Security card being issued in married name (3rd attempt!)

10/14/17: Biometrics appointment notice received, 10/25/17: Biometrics

1/2/18: EAD + AP approved (no website update), 1/5/18: EAD + AP mailed, 1/8/18: EAD + AP approval notice hardcopies received, 1/10/18: EAD + AP received

9/5/18: Interview scheduled notice, 10/17/18: Interview

10/24/18: Green card produced notice, 10/25/18: Formal approval, 10/31/18: Green card received

K-1:

Spoiler

I-129F

12/1/16: sent, 12/14/16: NOA1 hard copy received, 3/10/17: RFE (IMB verification), 3/22/17: RFE response received

3/24/17: Approved! , 3/30/17: NOA2 hard copy received

 

NVC

4/6/2017: Received, 4/12/2017: Sent to Riyadh embassy, 4/16/2017: Case received at Riyadh embassy, 4/21/2017: Request case transfer to Manila, approved 4/24/2017

 

K-1

5/1/2017: Case received by Manila (1 week embassy transfer??? Lucky~)

7/13/2017: Interview: APPROVED!!!

7/19/2017: Visa in hand

8/15/2017: POE

 

Filed: Timeline
Posted (edited)
9 hours ago, SusieQQQ said:

 

The table I reference d before https://travel.state.gov/content/dam/visas/Statistics/AnnualReports/FY2017AnnualReport/FY17AnnualReport -TableXVII.pdf is non-immigrant visas issued by nationality, not by post. So they are all Thailand nationals. And to reiterate again, they are ALL actually issued. Both these points are clearly indicated in the headings.

 

(to further underscore that it is issued by nationality not post, the table includes visas issued for nationals in countries that don’t have their own issuing posts, like St Lucia).

My bad -- I was referring to a report the OP had referenced early-on, which is a workload report.  But then I used the numbers from the report you cited, which -- as you know -- is a nationality-based report.  Didn't realize the OP had used your numbers in his bizarre manipulation of the numbers (and I didn't go look it up myself), and not from the report he had cited.

 

The first paragraph of my reply (re the assumption that there are refusals of B1 or B2 visas) is correct, for what that's worth!

Edited by jan22
Posted
13 hours ago, Boiler said:

Nope

 

13 hours ago, geowrian said:

B-1 is business visitor.

B-2 is tourism.

B-1/B-2 is business visitor and/or tourism.

The website says B1/B2 is "combination of both purposes".

So you can't interpret that as being "/or " for the purpose of tourism.

The D160 asks what is the purpose of your trip.  You must choose which type you are applying.

 

Posted
11 hours ago, jan22 said:

I'm not exactly sure what your point is about the 3 "types" of B visas -- they are all visitor visas; the B1 and B1/B2 are visitors for business and the B2 and B1/B2 are visitors for pleasure (i.e., tourists).  Your statement that a B1/B2 is for business is incorrect -- it is for business (the B1 part) or pleasure (the B2 part).

 

But, regardless of that, there is a major error in your reasoning.  There were no B1 or B2 refusals -- there would have been only issuance of individual B visas as opposed to the combination B1/B2 visa.  No matter what a person puts on the DS-160, all visitor visas are entered into the consular computer system as B1/B2, as that is the most common issuance.  It needs to be changed to issue either a B1 or a B2 if the officer decides to approve one instead of the combination.  A change is not made if a visa is being denied.  So, all those changed to either B1 or B2 are issuances and all the refusals were, technically, of B1/B2 visas.

 

Two other points:

      The Annual Report from which you've pulled issuances is a workload statistic, i.e., it is a summary report of an Embassy's non-immigrant visa workload for the year.  It is listed by country, but it does not seperate by nationalities.  That is, there is no breakdown of how many of the 44,414 issuances were for Thai nationals and how many were nationals of other countries who applied in Bangkok for whatever reason.

       However, the report on refusals IS a summary of the refusals of the nationals of that country -- no matter where in the world they applied.  

 

To use the 20% refusal rate on the 44,414 visitor visas processed in Bangkok is a little bit of apples and oranges, as you cannot tell what part of the 20% applied in Thailand as opposed to other countries.  

Thanks for that insight into the process.  You seem like you actually know what you're talking about.

The point of this thread is to address the issue of why a normal Thai woman would be refused a tourist visa. 

My point is very few B2 visas are issued to Thais.

 

Filed: K-1 Visa Country: Wales
Timeline
Posted
1 minute ago, faithintrust said:

Thanks for that insight into the process.  You seem like you actually know what you're talking about.

The point of this thread is to address the issue of why a normal Thai woman would be refused a tourist visa. 

My point is very few B2 visas are issued to Thais.

 

So what do you think all those people issued B1/2's are doing, entering for Business Visits or general Tourism?

“If you know the enemy and know yourself, you need not fear the result of a hundred battles. If you know yourself but not the enemy, for every victory gained you will also suffer a defeat. If you know neither the enemy nor yourself, you will succumb in every battle.”

Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Ecuador
Timeline
Posted

Administrative action has been applied to one poster's account for instigating ongoing arguments and for insulting other members.

 

This thread is locked and is not to be restarted or referred to.

 

As a note to others, please withhold snarky or otherwise noncontributory comments in similar situations.  Simply report the thread.

 

TBoneTX

VJ Moderation

06-04-2007 = TSC stamps postal return-receipt for I-129f.

06-11-2007 = NOA1 date (unknown to me).

07-20-2007 = Phoned Immigration Officer; got WAC#; where's NOA1?

09-25-2007 = Touch (first-ever).

09-28-2007 = NOA1, 23 days after their 45-day promise to send it (grrrr).

10-20 & 11-14-2007 = Phoned ImmOffs; "still pending."

12-11-2007 = 180 days; file is "between workstations, may be early Jan."; touches 12/11 & 12/12.

12-18-2007 = Call; file is with Division 9 ofcr. (bckgrnd check); e-prompt to shake it; touch.

12-19-2007 = NOA2 by e-mail & web, dated 12-18-07 (187 days; 201 per VJ); in mail 12/24/07.

01-09-2008 = File from USCIS to NVC, 1-4-08; NVC creates file, 1/15/08; to consulate 1/16/08.

01-23-2008 = Consulate gets file; outdated Packet 4 mailed to fiancee 1/27/08; rec'd 3/3/08.

04-29-2008 = Fiancee's 4-min. consular interview, 8:30 a.m.; much evidence brought but not allowed to be presented (consul: "More proof! Second interview! Bring your fiance!").

05-05-2008 = Infuriating $12 call to non-English-speaking consulate appointment-setter.

05-06-2008 = Better $12 call to English-speaker; "joint" interview date 6/30/08 (my selection).

06-30-2008 = Stokes Interrogations w/Ecuadorian (not USC); "wait 2 weeks; we'll mail her."

07-2008 = Daily calls to DOS: "currently processing"; 8/05 = Phoned consulate, got Section Chief; wrote him.

08-07-08 = E-mail from consulate, promising to issue visa "as soon as we get her passport" (on 8/12, per DHL).

08-27-08 = Phoned consulate (they "couldn't find" our file); visa DHL'd 8/28; in hand 9/1; through POE on 10/9 with NO hassles(!).

 
Didn't find the answer you were looking for? Ask our VJ Immigration Lawyers.
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
- Back to Top -

Important Disclaimer: Please read carefully the Visajourney.com Terms of Service. If you do not agree to the Terms of Service you should not access or view any page (including this page) on VisaJourney.com. Answers and comments provided on Visajourney.com Forums are general information, and are not intended to substitute for informed professional medical, psychiatric, psychological, tax, legal, investment, accounting, or other professional advice. Visajourney.com does not endorse, and expressly disclaims liability for any product, manufacturer, distributor, service or service provider mentioned or any opinion expressed in answers or comments. VisaJourney.com does not condone immigration fraud in any way, shape or manner. VisaJourney.com recommends that if any member or user knows directly of someone involved in fraudulent or illegal activity, that they report such activity directly to the Department of Homeland Security, Immigration and Customs Enforcement. You can contact ICE via email at Immigration.Reply@dhs.gov or you can telephone ICE at 1-866-347-2423. All reported threads/posts containing reference to immigration fraud or illegal activities will be removed from this board. If you feel that you have found inappropriate content, please let us know by contacting us here with a url link to that content. Thank you.
×
×
  • Create New...