Anonymous White House Writer Isn't A Patriot. They're Betraying The Constitution

[Cyberfx1024 7,980]

19 minutes ago, yuna628 said:

This is true, however with the electoral college in place, people running for President tend to only stop in select states that they know will count and don't really care about the rest, often taking it for granted.

You are correct ma'am. But that is still a lot better than if there was no Electoral College in the first place. 

[TBoneTX 46,041]

8 hours ago, Bill & Katya said:

We have to remember how the Constitution was set up which has worked great for many years.

But, but... living document... dead white slave-owning authors... must legislate from the bench... judiciary must usurp role of Congress by making law... but but but...

[Keith & Arileidi 437]

On 9/6/2018 at 11:48 AM, yuna628 said:

What is a reasonable step though? It is not up to other persons to decide what is or isn't less optimal. It is not up to them to hand hold an idiot. We elected the idiot, and we reap what we sow. We will never learn otherwise. What is being done, is another aspect of a democracy eroding. This is a republic, not a regency. Persons behind the scenes co-presidenting, handholding etc is just as wrongly dysfunctional as the person supposed to be the president themselves.

I don't have an exact definition of a "reasonable step" but I'm sure all of you have been through a time where your bosses crossed a line and you felt like you needed to escalate the issue. 

 

 

[Keith & Arileidi 437]

On 9/6/2018 at 11:47 AM, Randyandyuni said:

 

 

in both cases if either true, the actions, if done to misdirect the process of a legally elected government are questionable  and border on illegal

 

Definition of sedition

: incitement of resistance to or insurrection against lawful authority

And I approve...

I have no problem siding with counter cultures. 

[Voice of Reason 10,298]

7 minutes ago, Keith & Arileidi said:

And I approve...

I have no problem siding with counter cultures. 

You also have no problem with illegal immigrants.  Calls your judgement into question in my book.

[Keith & Arileidi 437]

On 9/6/2018 at 1:13 PM, jg121783 said:

What this group of people think is irrelevant compared to the much larger group that voted for Trump. What they think is only relevant at the ballot box. Just like the rest of us.

I'm sure someone already mentioned this.. but most of America voted Hillary. 

 

Or shall I say.. America mostly voted for Hillary. 

Edited September 7, 2018 by Keith & Arileidi

[Keith & Arileidi 437]

4 minutes ago, Satisfied said:

You also have no problem with illegal immigrants.  Calls your judgement into question in my book.

And I have no problem with that.. 

[Ban Hammer 13,503]

11 minutes ago, Keith & Arileidi said:

I'm sure someone already mentioned this.. but most of America voted Hillary. 

 

Or shall I say.. America mostly voted for Hillary. 

uh huh..........

[Crazy Cat 42,196]

8 minutes ago, Keith & Arileidi said:

I'm sure someone already mentioned this.. but most of America voted Hillary. 

 

Or shall I say.. America mostly voted for Hillary. 

Totally irrelevant.  Hillary is just a presidential election loser.......

 

 

[Crazy Cat 42,196]

1 minute ago, Ban Hammer said:

uh huh..........

and THAT ^^^ is why the Electoral College exits!!!!!!!  The founding fathers were brilliant in their methodology....

[Keith & Arileidi 437]

6 minutes ago, Ban Hammer said:

uh huh..........

You mean conservatives don't like to live next to each other? 

I wonder why.

Edited September 7, 2018 by Keith & Arileidi

[Randyandyuni 2,682]

34 minutes ago, Keith & Arileidi said:

You mean conservatives don't like to live next to each other? 

I wonder why.

I took the map as conservatives not liking to live in close proximity to liberals, not choosing to avoid other conservatives

[jg121783 3,921]

56 minutes ago, Keith & Arileidi said:

I'm sure someone already mentioned this.. but most of America voted Hillary. 

 

Or shall I say.. America mostly voted for Hillary. 

And who voted for these people that supposedly have the authority to over rule an elected president?

[jg121783 3,921]

3 minutes ago, Randyandyuni said:

I took the map as conservatives not liking to live in close proximity to liberals, not choosing to avoid other conservatives

Most of the blue areas also happen to be liberal run crime ridden sanctuary cities. Hence the reason most conservatives dont live in these areas.

[yuna628 9,705]

1 hour ago, Keith & Arileidi said:

I don't have an exact definition of a "reasonable step" but I'm sure all of you have been through a time where your bosses crossed a line and you felt like you needed to escalate the issue. 

 

 

Sure. But I sure as heck didn't steal my boss' stuff and decide to co-boss with them in secret because the boss is too much of an idiot to notice, then complain about how morally abhorrent my boss is, but continue working for him out of some weird ego-centric need to feel gratified that my only purpose in life is to save America from that stupidity. Again, that's not a democracy. That's a regency, and not even a very good one. America did not elect this individual and others 'co-presidenting' into office.

 

It's like saying ''oh I totally helped that dictator butcher non-desirables, which upset me, but I made sure that he didn't do it too often because that is just gross and I reaaallly care, and I hang around because tax cuts are soooo cool!" Men of principles, moral men, do not lurk behind the scenes sullying themselves with more rot, whine about it, and think themselves so big-headed that *they* know what's best. It's complicity. Unethical. They should have never taken the job, and should have just as quickly exited the building ringing the alarm bells as they went.

 

It's one of the reasons why I remain very skeptical as to the validity of the op-ed. Something stinks.

 

Suffice to say we all don't want the president to throw a temper tantrum and hit the big red buttons. But imho, if he does do it, again.. one reaps what they sow.

 

1 hour ago, Ban Hammer said:

uh huh..........

And? Do you think the red on that map reflects the numbers? Because it didn't. There's a lot of red on the map in Maryland and many of those states. That means nothing, because the physical numbers of blue (represented by your tiny specs on the map) erase the red out. Statistically that map will change during each election cycle, and there's many reasons for it - as people move around to different states.