Jump to content
TRISHA80

I 485 denied for advance parole, when can I refile

 Share

28 posts in this topic

Recommended Posts

My mom I 485 was denied because sh was unaware she had to get advance parole, she left and came back with her B2 visa. Her I 130 got approved. Can she refile her I-485 with the approved I130 .

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Errr, to be entirely honest, it does not sound like she used the B2 correctly. Refiling the I-485 will only make that extremely clear to USCIS, in my opinion. Perhaps someone more experienced can chime in to provide more insight. Paging @geowrian ...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The I-485 was correctly denied.

If she entered with intent to stay, then it would be fraud to file for AOS (regardless of USCIS's pursuit of checking on this or not).

See the warning in the guide: http://www.visajourney.com/content/i130guide2

 

Edit: To directly answer the question asked, "yes".

At the same time, it would be far faster anyway to use the approved I-130 and obtain an IR-5 visa abroad. Likely a few months really.

Edited by geowrian

Timelines:

ROC:

Spoiler

7/27/20: Sent forms to Dallas lockbox, 7/30/20: Received by USCIS, 8/10 NOA1 electronic notification received, 8/1/ NOA1 hard copy received

AOS:

Spoiler

AOS (I-485 + I-131 + I-765):

9/25/17: sent forms to Chicago, 9/27/17: received by USCIS, 10/4/17: NOA1 electronic notification received, 10/10/17: NOA1 hard copy received. Social Security card being issued in married name (3rd attempt!)

10/14/17: Biometrics appointment notice received, 10/25/17: Biometrics

1/2/18: EAD + AP approved (no website update), 1/5/18: EAD + AP mailed, 1/8/18: EAD + AP approval notice hardcopies received, 1/10/18: EAD + AP received

9/5/18: Interview scheduled notice, 10/17/18: Interview

10/24/18: Green card produced notice, 10/25/18: Formal approval, 10/31/18: Green card received

K-1:

Spoiler

I-129F

12/1/16: sent, 12/14/16: NOA1 hard copy received, 3/10/17: RFE (IMB verification), 3/22/17: RFE response received

3/24/17: Approved! , 3/30/17: NOA2 hard copy received

 

NVC

4/6/2017: Received, 4/12/2017: Sent to Riyadh embassy, 4/16/2017: Case received at Riyadh embassy, 4/21/2017: Request case transfer to Manila, approved 4/24/2017

 

K-1

5/1/2017: Case received by Manila (1 week embassy transfer??? Lucky~)

7/13/2017: Interview: APPROVED!!!

7/19/2017: Visa in hand

8/15/2017: POE

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, geowrian said:

The I-485 was correctly denied.

If she entered with intent to stay, then it would be fraud to file for AOS (regardless of USCIS's pursuit of checking on this or not).

See the warning in the guide: http://www.visajourney.com/content/i130guide2

 

Edit: To directly answer the question asked, "yes".

At the same time, it would be far faster anyway to use the approved I-130 and obtain an IR-5 visa abroad. Likely a few months really.

I know everyone says intent is established at the border. But I'm sure there are cases in which it is clear (or clearer than usual) that intentions were misrepresented. In this case, the mom was in the middle of AoS, accidentally abandoned AP and then returned with B2. If she were to file I-485 right now, I feel like that would be extremely suspicious and would throw her intentions into question. I don't know how AoS interviews for parents are conducted but is it possible the IO would question the mom about her intent in this case?? If I were an IO, I probably would but that's just me.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, mushroomspore said:

I know everyone says intent is established at the border. But I'm sure there are cases in which it is clear (or clearer than usual) that intentions were misrepresented. In this case, the mom was in the middle of AoS, accidentally abandoned AP and then returned with B2. If she were to file I-485 right now, I feel like that would be extremely suspicious and would throw her intentions into question. I don't know how AoS interviews for parents are conducted but is it possible the IO would question the mom about her intent in this case?? If I were an IO, I probably would but that's just me.

They likely would not question it given past BIA rulings, nor should it (AFAIK under the law, not personally) be an issue for AOS.

But at the same time, it is still fraud to enter the US with intent to stay/AOS, regardless if one can get away with it..

Edited by geowrian

Timelines:

ROC:

Spoiler

7/27/20: Sent forms to Dallas lockbox, 7/30/20: Received by USCIS, 8/10 NOA1 electronic notification received, 8/1/ NOA1 hard copy received

AOS:

Spoiler

AOS (I-485 + I-131 + I-765):

9/25/17: sent forms to Chicago, 9/27/17: received by USCIS, 10/4/17: NOA1 electronic notification received, 10/10/17: NOA1 hard copy received. Social Security card being issued in married name (3rd attempt!)

10/14/17: Biometrics appointment notice received, 10/25/17: Biometrics

1/2/18: EAD + AP approved (no website update), 1/5/18: EAD + AP mailed, 1/8/18: EAD + AP approval notice hardcopies received, 1/10/18: EAD + AP received

9/5/18: Interview scheduled notice, 10/17/18: Interview

10/24/18: Green card produced notice, 10/25/18: Formal approval, 10/31/18: Green card received

K-1:

Spoiler

I-129F

12/1/16: sent, 12/14/16: NOA1 hard copy received, 3/10/17: RFE (IMB verification), 3/22/17: RFE response received

3/24/17: Approved! , 3/30/17: NOA2 hard copy received

 

NVC

4/6/2017: Received, 4/12/2017: Sent to Riyadh embassy, 4/16/2017: Case received at Riyadh embassy, 4/21/2017: Request case transfer to Manila, approved 4/24/2017

 

K-1

5/1/2017: Case received by Manila (1 week embassy transfer??? Lucky~)

7/13/2017: Interview: APPROVED!!!

7/19/2017: Visa in hand

8/15/2017: POE

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: K-1 Visa Country: Wales
Timeline

Sounds like she did it twice.

“If you know the enemy and know yourself, you need not fear the result of a hundred battles. If you know yourself but not the enemy, for every victory gained you will also suffer a defeat. If you know neither the enemy nor yourself, you will succumb in every battle.”

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It’s only going to stop being an issue if or when all such transgressions stop being automatically forgiven for IRs. 

 

1 hour ago, geowrian said:

They likely would not question it given past BIA rulings, nor should it (AFAIK under the law, not personally) be an issue for AOS.

But at the same time, it is still fraud to enter the US with intent to stay/AOS, regardless if one can get away with it..

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 hours ago, SusieQQQ said:

It’s only going to stop being an issue if or when all such transgressions stop being automatically forgiven for IRs. 

 

Unlikely to stop in the near future, because, a)USCIS makes money with the i485 fee, and b)transfers workload from US embassy IR interviews. 

I-751 journey

 

10/16/2017.......... ROC package mailed

10/18/2017.......... I-751 package received VSC

10/19/2017.......... I-797 NOA date

10/30/2017.......... Notice received in mail

10/30/2017.......... Check cashed

11/02/2017.......... Conditional GC expired

11/22/2017.......... Biometrics completed

  xx/xx/xxxx.......... waiting waiting waiting

Link to comment
Share on other sites

46 minutes ago, WeGuyGal said:

Unlikely to stop in the near future, because, a)USCIS makes money with the i485 fee, and b)transfers workload from US embassy IR interviews. 

Well then there is just about zero incentive to follow the rules. Highly annoying for the rest of those who do.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, SusieQQQ said:

Well then there is just about zero incentive to follow the rules. Highly annoying for the rest of those who do.

Sadly, correct. 

 

Another incentive for AOS on a B2.. many USEmbs have begun consolidating IV interviews to one location.. think Mumbai, etc. Hassle for an applicant, say in Delhi, to travel/stay in another city. So once a B2 is obtained in Delhi, travel to the US and voila, file AOS from the comfort of home, bypassing Mumbai altogether. 

Edited by WeGuyGal

I-751 journey

 

10/16/2017.......... ROC package mailed

10/18/2017.......... I-751 package received VSC

10/19/2017.......... I-797 NOA date

10/30/2017.......... Notice received in mail

10/30/2017.......... Check cashed

11/02/2017.......... Conditional GC expired

11/22/2017.......... Biometrics completed

  xx/xx/xxxx.......... waiting waiting waiting

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, WeGuyGal said:

Sadly, correct. 

 

Another incentive for AOS on a B2.. many USEmbs have begun consolidating IV interviews to one location.. think Mumbai, etc. Hassle for an applicant, say in Delhi, to travel/stay in another city. So once a B2 is obtained in Delhi, travel to the US and voila, file AOS from the comfort of home, bypassing Mumbai. 

Flip side is the many genuine B applicants who get denied for not being able to overcome immigrant intent 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, SusieQQQ said:

Flip side is the many genuine B applicants who get denied for not being able to overcome immigrant intent 

Yep

But devil's advocate.. why would B-approved individuals care about B applicants behind them?  Human instinct is me me me. 

I-751 journey

 

10/16/2017.......... ROC package mailed

10/18/2017.......... I-751 package received VSC

10/19/2017.......... I-797 NOA date

10/30/2017.......... Notice received in mail

10/30/2017.......... Check cashed

11/02/2017.......... Conditional GC expired

11/22/2017.......... Biometrics completed

  xx/xx/xxxx.......... waiting waiting waiting

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, WeGuyGal said:

Yep

But devil's advocate.. why would B-approved individuals care about B applicants behind them?  Human instinct is me me me. 

Of course

but we always get people complaining about how mean the US officials are , not about how their fellow compatriots don’t care about them

 

But back to the actual topic, tbh i’m surprised the mom got entry ...presumably she wasn’t asked about purpose of entry 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 
Didn't find the answer you were looking for? Ask our VJ Immigration Lawyers.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
- Back to Top -

Important Disclaimer: Please read carefully the Visajourney.com Terms of Service. If you do not agree to the Terms of Service you should not access or view any page (including this page) on VisaJourney.com. Answers and comments provided on Visajourney.com Forums are general information, and are not intended to substitute for informed professional medical, psychiatric, psychological, tax, legal, investment, accounting, or other professional advice. Visajourney.com does not endorse, and expressly disclaims liability for any product, manufacturer, distributor, service or service provider mentioned or any opinion expressed in answers or comments. VisaJourney.com does not condone immigration fraud in any way, shape or manner. VisaJourney.com recommends that if any member or user knows directly of someone involved in fraudulent or illegal activity, that they report such activity directly to the Department of Homeland Security, Immigration and Customs Enforcement. You can contact ICE via email at Immigration.Reply@dhs.gov or you can telephone ICE at 1-866-347-2423. All reported threads/posts containing reference to immigration fraud or illegal activities will be removed from this board. If you feel that you have found inappropriate content, please let us know by contacting us here with a url link to that content. Thank you.
×
×
  • Create New...