August 2018 I-129F Filers

[carmzzzt 44]

Hoping for more August approvals this week, less RFEs! 

[Rau88 23]

16 hours ago, Blondie0216 said:

When did you apply

On Aug 9, got our NOA1 Aug 13

[Robin Redemsky 32]

1 hour ago, carmzzzt said:

Hoping for more August approvals this week, less RFEs! 

I was just thinking that this morning! I called my fiancé before he had to go to work and he said he woke up with a hopeful feeling for this week that we might hear back. I hope his gut feeling is right! We’ve been tentatively planning our wedding and I’m so excited!

[Blondie0216 93]

3 minutes ago, Robin Redemsky said:

I was just thinking that this morning! I called my fiancé before he had to go to work and he said he woke up with a hopeful feeling for this week that we might hear back. I hope his gut feeling is right! We’ve been tentatively planning our wedding and I’m so excited!

Hoping you hear soon.  I'm just waiting for paper RFE to arrive so we can get it done.  

[AGF 146]

On 23 January 2019 at 9:41 PM, JMEngland said:

I have been digging into recent cases and it seems like about a week to receive the letter in the mail, the 8 to 10 days for NOA2 after sending your response. To me, this is not bad, so hopefully it's the case for us. 

 Found out in the mail today about our RFE.. Apparently, it was about the criminal background  records of my fiancé ( the petitioner ). He said that he told them that he had been arrested for DUI but was fined for less than $500.. However, he didn't think that he "ticked" the "yes" or "no" part. So I advised him that he was indeed giving conflicting answers. He said that he don't think there will still be records of it.. Any advise on how best to proceed? 

[Blondie0216 93]

18 minutes ago, AGF said:

 Found out in the mail today about our RFE.. Apparently, it was about the criminal background  records of my fiancé ( the petitioner ). He said that he told them that he had been arrested for DUI but was fined for less than $500.. However, he didn't think that he "ticked" the "yes" or "no" part. So I advised him that he was indeed giving conflicting answers. He said that he don't think there will still be records of it.. Any advise on how best to proceed? 

I would have him call the courts to find out if there are records and if so get a copy.

[AGF 146]

4 minutes ago, Blondie0216 said:

I would have him call the courts to find out if there are records and if so get a copy.

Yes, that would be the sound course of action.. Thank you ☺️

[umberto888 15]

Hello guys, did anybody know if there is some problem when you get the paper NOA2 but both site still say "case received"? I wonder if that can cause delay in the transmission to the NVC?

[O-J 174]

4 minutes ago, umberto888 said:

Hello guys, did anybody know if there is some problem when you get the paper NOA2 but both site still say "case received"? I wonder if that can cause delay in the transmission to the NVC?

The sites are not reliable as they aren’t regularly updated or in some cases aren’t at all. Received my NOA2 in December and the old site still says case received. It’s nothing to worry about and will not cause any delay. The paper notice is what you want to see. 

[Shiran 1,134]

32 minutes ago, umberto888 said:

Hello guys, did anybody know if there is some problem when you get the paper NOA2 but both site still say "case received"? I wonder if that can cause delay in the transmission to the NVC?

No sites were updated for me either but the case now is at embassy. There was no delay. Right now it seems to take 2-3 weeks to transfer case from USCIS to NVC.

[Faisal1 235]

11 minutes ago, Shiran said:

No sites were updated for me either but the case now is at embassy. There was no delay. Right now it seems to take 2-3 weeks to transfer case from USCIS to NVC.

Good luck shiran

[Javier Mera 217]

On 1/26/2019 at 7:43 PM, Barker Family said:

No. I called the day they processed it. They told me they will send an email once they send it to the embassy. 

I just called the NVC and they haven't received my case yet after two weeks. I guess I shouldn't panic yet since it hasn't been 4 full weeks like the NOA2 says.

[Greenbaum 12,259]

4 hours ago, AGF said:

 Found out in the mail today about our RFE.. Apparently, it was about the criminal background  records of my fiancé ( the petitioner ). He said that he told them that he had been arrested for DUI but was fined for less than $500.. However, he didn't think that he "ticked" the "yes" or "no" part. So I advised him that he was indeed giving conflicting answers. He said that he don't think there will still be records of it.. Any advise on how best to proceed? 

Here is a similar issue that I will use as an example. John has posted about his ordeal and it is worth the two of you reading BEFORE you send your RFE back.

 

http://www.visajourney.com/forums/topic/682870-september-2018-i-129f-filers/?page=5

 

I failed to mention a 30 year old misdemeanor arrest that was dropped and later expunged.  It was my fault and partially the fault of the company we used to help with the petition.  The governments instructions were very clear.  The company we used was not as clear as they should have been.  Since there are no public records and no possibility of me getting any information, I assumed it was no longer an impediment.  The expungement ordered all records, digital and hard, to be destroyed.  There was no record that I could produce so I failed to add it to the petition.  That was my mistake and we were denied because of the petitioner failing to disclose information in the petition.

[Faisal1 235]

6 minutes ago, Greenbaum said:

Here is a similar issue that I will use as an example. John has posted about his ordeal and it is worth the two of you reading BEFORE you send your RFE back.

 

http://www.visajourney.com/forums/topic/682870-september-2018-i-129f-filers/?page=5

 

I failed to mention a 30 year old misdemeanor arrest that was dropped and later expunged.  It was my fault and partially the fault of the company we used to help with the petition.  The governments instructions were very clear.  The company we used was not as clear as they should have been.  Since there are no public records and no possibility of me getting any information, I assumed it was no longer an impediment.  The expungement ordered all records, digital and hard, to be destroyed.  There was no record that I could produce so I failed to add it to the petition.  That was my mistake and we were denied because of the petitioner failing to disclose information in the petition.

Check your inbox

[Faisal1 235]

They change date of processing from 2 july to 21 june

 4.5 to 5.5