Trump proposal would make it harder for legal immigrants to gain citizenship (merged)

[Hypnos 6,576]

4 hours ago, AdnanS said:

Can you point on where in the articles is specifically mentions this and they will not touch naturalization?

http://myattorneyusa.com/rare-situations-involving-public-charge-and-naturalization contains useful links directly to the relevant parts of the INA. 

[njblue 51]

22 hours ago, crazyworld said:

Quoting myself from another thread lol - Saw this this morning and makes me mad. I was on Obamacare before I married my wife and she was on it with me for a year (never used it) until I got health insurance from my new employer.  Preying this will not effects us since we are now applying for removing of conditions for the 10 year green card. In the future once my mum passes on, we are planing to move to England to be with her family for awhile but that will not be for a few more years at least. 

Hi I was on Obamacare for a year before removing my conditions . They approved me , no issues , now I’m waiting for my naturalization interview. 

[pauli 49]

As I wrote earlier, if the administration/Stephen Miller were truly concerned about "US taxpayers propping up immigrants receiving benefits", then why not simply enforce the Affidavit of Support and make the sponsor reimburse the govt?  Instead, this just reeks as a lame attempt to kick out lawful immigrants.

 

Gotta say it - republicans are living in the now, but are toast in the next few decades if they can't expand their base beyond what it currently is.  Changing demographics are gonna catch up to them.

[Dave&Kal 26]

https://www.nj.com/opinion/index.ssf/2018/08/only_whites_need_apply_for_citizenship_trump_targe.html

[EM_Vandaveer 2,408]

MIL & me & my husband arguing politics this morning. Some snippets (by MIL)

We need the wall, it could be terrorists coming in.

US will become like Europe, Muslims will overtake us.

No amount of arguing can convince her that the statistics of more non-white babies than white babies being born is NOT the same as more Muslim babies than non-Muslim babies being born.....

[Dave&Kal 26]

3 hours ago, Hypnos said:

http://myattorneyusa.com/rare-situations-involving-public-charge-and-naturalization contains useful links directly to the relevant parts of the INA. 

The thing is all the info we have for now is the old ones which have been repeated in many places and we mostly are aware of them. The reason why we are all in here is the concern about the changes which seem to be underway and no matter what the laws have said so far, what matters is, what is going to happen, and if that is legal to happen and if there is anything we can do to avoid the consequences.

Edited August 8, 2018 by Dave&Kal

[Unidentified 2,930]

20 hours ago, bananite said:

It's an "I got to immigrate, now close the doors" attitude and it's not appreciated here. 

Speak for yourself dude. Don't assume everyone thinks like you. You don't appreciate it, that's fine. but don't assume everyone agrees with you. 

[Unidentified 2,930]

20 hours ago, IndigoPhantom said:

Yes it does. You don't get to say how people should not immigrate to the US anymore when you yourself is a modern migrant. Well assuming you didn't migrate in the 1800. You got the chance and option to migrate to the US and so does anybody else who does it legally. Its not up to you to decide on that.

She has the right to her opinion just like you do. 

[Unidentified 2,930]

19 hours ago, ms80 said:

It’s funny you here praising trump knowing that it’s because of the so called “Angry left “ that being Gay you are allowed to be married and bring your husband here, for the right a bakery should even have the right not to sell you a cake because of their believe  🎂 😳

Yeah because in this country we actually respect religious freedom. Not like in Europe...

[AdnanS 82]

2 minutes ago, Unidentified said:

How many times do we have to say that this has nothing to do with Trump? They're just deciding to enforce something that has been the rule this entire time. 

 

Many people will be effected due to Obama Care change whereas right now it's not considered a public charge and he's going to make it so which would effect my wife and others on this thread and forum. 

[The Nature Boy 7,659]

11 minutes ago, Unidentified said:

How many times do we have to say that this has nothing to do with Trump? They're just deciding to enforce something that has been the rule this entire time. 

You will never get that to sink in 

[TBoneTX 45,292]

This thread is locked to further comment.  The topic is not to be restarted in this forum or elsewhere, and its drama is not to be transported into other threads.

 

Multiple administrative actions have been issued in response to the two Terms of Service provisions mentioned a few posts above, and in addition, for avoiding the site's profanity filter, noncontributory posting, and ignoring general and specific Moderation warnings.

 

There is no need to report any more TOS-violating posts in this thread, although your sensitivity to same is appreciated.

 

In regard to the thread's long-ago-derailed original topic, clear heads would acknowledge that no proposal of this nature could ever be made to apply retroactively.

 

Please return to respectful posting behavior henceforth.  The site's Terms of Service are found here: http://www.visajourney.com/content/terms

 

TBoneTX

for VJ Moderation