ARE TECH GIANTS WORKING TOGETHER TO CENSOR CONSERVATIVES? — Apple, YouTube and Facebook BAN Infowars on Same Day

[The Nature Boy 7,659]

8 minutes ago, smilesammich said:

i don't consider her tweets attacks, i do not feel attacked by her tweets at all.

You are really having a hard time defending this racist wacko. You dont consider her tweets attacks but in you last post before this one you said 

 

 

 

 

[smilesammich 10,727]

5 minutes ago, Randyandyuni said:

Perhaps I don't know proper etiquette for Twitter, I have limited exposure, I just find it odd she gets a free pass for her commentary because she is a minority, personally, I would think if you find something so abhorrent to generate such anger your response would be tempered and not looking for an eye for an eye retribution. It is alien to my nature

alien to your nature or alien to your experience?

i wouldn't exactly know how to predict my reaction if i were in her shoes, because well - i never will be.

[smilesammich 10,727]

4 minutes ago, Nature Boy Flair said:

You are really having a hard time defending this racist wacko. You dont consider her tweets attacks but in you last post before this one you said 

 

 

 

 

i should have put quotes around attacks. which is how you presented her tweets. i don't consider them attacks.

[Randyandyuni 2,682]

7 minutes ago, smilesammich said:

alien to your nature or alien to your experience?

i wouldn't exactly know how to predict my reaction if i were in her shoes, because well - i never will be.

Both, I don't condone such behavior, I treat people how they deserve to be treated I am open, accepting if you are cruel or offensive I do not interact, I do not respond in kind

[Voice of Reason 10,298]

3 hours ago, Webdevman said:

I do not read either of those publications. Let me know when you see it on tv and radio as you see it on the right with Fox News, Rush Limbaugh, Laura Ingram.. I could go on and on. 

 

I am not saying there are not some racist Democrats but it doesn't come close at all to the racism on the right. Just look at the immigration policies, voting, etc. 

 

 

That’s pretty funny, right there.  The democrat party has been the biggest proponents of racism for several decades.  Still are today.  That’s why their communities suffer so much, as they try to keep the minorities down.  

[smilesammich 10,727]

9 minutes ago, Randyandyuni said:

Both, I don't condone such behavior, I treat people how they deserve to be treated I am open, accepting if you are cruel or offensive I do not interact, I do not respond in kind

i don't think you will but, i highly recommend never using twitter..

[Voice of Reason 10,298]

49 minutes ago, Nature Boy Flair said:

does not attacking all because of the actions a few go against everything you have been preaching on here for years

Only when it’s convenient.  It’s against the TOS here, that’s for sure.  That’s part of the reason I didn’t post more of her comments.  Well, that and her language.

[Randyandyuni 2,682]

11 minutes ago, smilesammich said:

i don't think you will but, i highly recommend never using twitter..

Lol I do not

[Webdevman 93]

2 hours ago, Satisfied said:

That’s pretty funny, right there.  The democrat party has been the biggest proponents of racism for several decades.  Still are today.  That’s why their communities suffer so much, as they try to keep the minorities down.  

Right, keep telling yourself that. I am sure that is what Fox news tells you. In the 60s democrats and republicans basically switched. Yes, democrats used to be the racist party but no longer. Now the democratic party is the big tent and republicans are the racist party.. That was pretty clear when Trump said there were good Nazis.. He would not say anything negative because they are part of his base. Can you deny that?

 

There is no conservative party any more. Ronald Reagan would be ashamed of the Republican party we have today.

Edited August 10, 2018 by Webdevman

[Webdevman 93]

4 hours ago, Randyandyuni said:

My responses on this forum have been directed towards several comments that implied any derogatory comments directed towards whites should be acceptable because we have not been exposed to widespread racism.

 

My responses were intended to state my opininion that racist speech whether racist in intent or voice is wrong.

 

I have stated I do not believe her intent was to be racist while I believe her words were racist.

 

I don't support Trump, didn't vote him, I do however support the presidency, as such I will support him.

 

Where have I been inconsistent in my statements?

I wouldn't say her comments were acceptable but they are very old and she was replying to on attack. She also said she used the wrong choice of words. What she said was stupid but not nearly at the same level as AJ. Yes, her comments were wrong. I am not sure if she has made any more comments like that since. I honestly never even heard of her until people started using it as a talking point to counter AJ.

[Randyandyuni 2,682]

2 minutes ago, Webdevman said:

I wouldn't say her comments were acceptable but they are very old and she was replying to on attack. She also said she used the wrong choice of words. What she said was stupid but not nearly at the same level as AJ. Yes, her comments were wrong. I am not sure if she has made any more comments like that since. I honestly never even heard of her until people started using it as a talking point to counter AJ.

Again as I have said repeatedly, I do not follow or listen to AJ, as far as her comments being old, they were as late as 2016, not exactly ancient history. Do rascist comments have expiration dates? I was unaware. I am not questioning her racism but her judgement and maturity, stupid comments for someone to make with aspirations of general public acceptance

[smilesammich 10,727]

2 minutes ago, Randyandyuni said:

Again as I have said repeatedly, I do not follow or listen to AJ, as far as her comments being old, they were as late as 2016, not exactly ancient history. Do rascist comments have expiration dates? I was unaware. I am not questioning her racism but her judgement and maturity, stupid comments for someone to make with aspirations of general public acceptance

i feel like the current president has broken down all barriers for those who make immature, stupid comments achieving public acceptance. it's a brave new world.

[Randyandyuni 2,682]

3 minutes ago, smilesammich said:

i feel like the current president has broken down all barriers for those who make immature, stupid comments achieving public acceptance. it's a brave new world.

Then you are in support of a free-for-all all without regard to basic decency or humanity?

 

Normaling behavior you consider abhorrent is in essence supporting bad behavior, I pray we have not sunk that low

 

[The Nature Boy 7,659]

26 minutes ago, Webdevman said:

Right, keep telling yourself that. I am sure that is what Fox news tells you. In the 60s democrats and republicans basically switched. Yes, democrats used to be the racist party but no longer. Now the democratic party is the big tent and republicans are the racist party.. That was pretty clear when Trump said there were good Nazis.. He would not say anything negative because they are part of his base. Can you deny that?

 

There is no conservative party any more. Ronald Reagan would be ashamed of the Republican party we have today.

can you link us to the quote where Trump said there are good Nazi's.  I missed that

[smilesammich 10,727]

Just now, Randyandyuni said:

Then you are in support of a free-for-all all without regard to basic decency or humanity?

 

Normaling behavior you consider abhorrent is in essence supporting bad behavior, I pray we have not sunk that low

 

this comparison is almost comical when considering the actions of the current administration, with regard to basic decency and humanity.

dude is president, we're that low.