Jump to content

78 posts in this topic

Recommended Posts

Posted
1 minute ago, Nature Boy Flair said:

why are you defending a blatant racist. Why wasnt Rosanne kept because she is funny, or Paula Deen not dropped because she is a good cook, or the founder of Papa Johns not kept because he is a good President,  or Curt Shilling not fired because he was an excellent broadcaster.  I could go on for pages.

 

because i don't believe she's a racist. i understand what she was doing. 

you have to ask the people that did the firing those questions.

Filed: Timeline
Posted
7 minutes ago, Nature Boy Flair said:

why are you defending a blatant racist. Why wasnt Rosanne kept because she is funny, or Paula Deen not dropped because she is a good cook, or the founder of Papa Johns not kept because he is a good President,  or Curt Shilling not fired because he was an excellent broadcaster.  I could go on for pages.

 

Like many hypocrisies from the left (such as punching people with whom you don't agree in the face), racism is ok when the person/people doing it is also on your side.  I mean, what could be funnier, or perhaps more fulfilling to your personal agenda than a person who is a racist but votes liberal?

Posted
Just now, Satisfied said:

Like many hypocrisies from the left (such as punching people with whom you don't agree in the face), racism is ok when the person/people doing it is also on your side.  I mean, what could be funnier, or perhaps more fulfilling to your personal agenda than a person who is a racist but votes liberal?

punching nazis. not random people i disagree with.

Posted
49 minutes ago, Satisfied said:

Like many hypocrisies from the left (such as punching people with whom you don't agree in the face), racism is ok when the person/people doing it is also on your side.  I mean, what could be funnier, or perhaps more fulfilling to your personal agenda than a person who is a racist but votes liberal?

I am sure this was taken out of context --http://www.foxnews.com/entertainment/2018/08/02/new-york-times-stands-by-new-tech-writer-sarah-jeong-after-racist-tweets-surface.html

 

1533218740140.jpg?ve=1&tl=1

 

1533218748690.jpg?ve=1&tl=1

Posted

If the left didn't have double standards they would have no standards at all.

 

1 hour ago, smilesammich said:

punching nazis. not random people i disagree with.

So it's okay to assault someone you disagree with politically as long as you falsely label them as a Nazi?

morfunphil1_zpsoja67jml.jpg

Posted
Just now, jg121783 said:

If the left didn't have double standards they would have no standards at all.

 

So it's okay to assault someone you disagree with politically as long as you falsely label them as a Nazi?

if they claim to be a nazi, i'd believe them.

Posted
46 minutes ago, smilesammich said:

if they claim to be a nazi, i'd believe them.

So you don't condone leftist groups like antifa when they assault people because they disagree with them and slap a false Nazi label on them? Only when the person actually says they are a Nazi? I just want to be clear on this.

morfunphil1_zpsoja67jml.jpg

Posted
6 minutes ago, jg121783 said:

So you don't condone leftist groups like antifa when they assault people because they disagree with them and slap a false Nazi label on them? Only when the person actually says they are a Nazi? I just want to be clear on this.

i've made myself clear. 

Posted
15 minutes ago, smilesammich said:

i've made myself clear. 

So you do or you don't condone groups like antifa assaulting people who never claimed to be Nazis? I think you were clear on your position of assaulting people who claim to be Nazis but not so clear on people who have been assaulted who are in no way associated with Nazis but have a Nazi label falsely placed on them. Personally I think it's wrong to assault anyone but your apparent position on assaulting Nazis is at least understandable. I'm just trying to clarify your position on the people who have been assaulted that aren't Nazis.

morfunphil1_zpsoja67jml.jpg

Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Ecuador
Timeline
Posted

The gigantic candidate pool that the NYT had, and they hired that?

06-04-2007 = TSC stamps postal return-receipt for I-129f.

06-11-2007 = NOA1 date (unknown to me).

07-20-2007 = Phoned Immigration Officer; got WAC#; where's NOA1?

09-25-2007 = Touch (first-ever).

09-28-2007 = NOA1, 23 days after their 45-day promise to send it (grrrr).

10-20 & 11-14-2007 = Phoned ImmOffs; "still pending."

12-11-2007 = 180 days; file is "between workstations, may be early Jan."; touches 12/11 & 12/12.

12-18-2007 = Call; file is with Division 9 ofcr. (bckgrnd check); e-prompt to shake it; touch.

12-19-2007 = NOA2 by e-mail & web, dated 12-18-07 (187 days; 201 per VJ); in mail 12/24/07.

01-09-2008 = File from USCIS to NVC, 1-4-08; NVC creates file, 1/15/08; to consulate 1/16/08.

01-23-2008 = Consulate gets file; outdated Packet 4 mailed to fiancee 1/27/08; rec'd 3/3/08.

04-29-2008 = Fiancee's 4-min. consular interview, 8:30 a.m.; much evidence brought but not allowed to be presented (consul: "More proof! Second interview! Bring your fiance!").

05-05-2008 = Infuriating $12 call to non-English-speaking consulate appointment-setter.

05-06-2008 = Better $12 call to English-speaker; "joint" interview date 6/30/08 (my selection).

06-30-2008 = Stokes Interrogations w/Ecuadorian (not USC); "wait 2 weeks; we'll mail her."

07-2008 = Daily calls to DOS: "currently processing"; 8/05 = Phoned consulate, got Section Chief; wrote him.

08-07-08 = E-mail from consulate, promising to issue visa "as soon as we get her passport" (on 8/12, per DHL).

08-27-08 = Phoned consulate (they "couldn't find" our file); visa DHL'd 8/28; in hand 9/1; through POE on 10/9 with NO hassles(!).

Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Russia
Timeline
Posted
12 hours ago, smilesammich said:

punching nazis. not random people i disagree with.

How do we know it will stop with Nazis?

Visa Received : 2014-04-04 (K1 - see timeline for details)

US Entry : 2014-09-12

POE: Detroit

Marriage : 2014-09-27

I-765 Approved: 2015-01-09

I-485 Interview: 2015-03-11

I-485 Approved: 2015-03-13

Green Card Received: 2015-03-24 Yeah!!!

I-751 ROC Submitted: 2016-12-20

I-751 NOA Received:  2016-12-29

I-751 Biometrics Appt.:  2017-01-26

I-751 Interview:  2018-04-10

I-751 Approved:  2018-05-04

N400 Filed:  2018-01-13

N400 Biometrics:  2018-02-22

N400 Interview:  2018-04-10

N400 Approved:  2018-04-10

Oath Ceremony:  2018-06-11 - DONE!!!!!!!

 
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
- Back to Top -

Important Disclaimer: Please read carefully the Visajourney.com Terms of Service. If you do not agree to the Terms of Service you should not access or view any page (including this page) on VisaJourney.com. Answers and comments provided on Visajourney.com Forums are general information, and are not intended to substitute for informed professional medical, psychiatric, psychological, tax, legal, investment, accounting, or other professional advice. Visajourney.com does not endorse, and expressly disclaims liability for any product, manufacturer, distributor, service or service provider mentioned or any opinion expressed in answers or comments. VisaJourney.com does not condone immigration fraud in any way, shape or manner. VisaJourney.com recommends that if any member or user knows directly of someone involved in fraudulent or illegal activity, that they report such activity directly to the Department of Homeland Security, Immigration and Customs Enforcement. You can contact ICE via email at Immigration.Reply@dhs.gov or you can telephone ICE at 1-866-347-2423. All reported threads/posts containing reference to immigration fraud or illegal activities will be removed from this board. If you feel that you have found inappropriate content, please let us know by contacting us here with a url link to that content. Thank you.
×
×
  • Create New...