Daily Presidential Tracking Poll

[Voice of Reason 10,298]

1 hour ago, Ironclad43 said:

I'm glad you find the truth humorous, most find it frightening.

Some people are not good at finding things, even when given good directions.  Don’t feel bad.

[Steeleballz 7,550]

4 minutes ago, Nature Boy Flair said:

Rasmussen calls itself most accurate pollster of 2016

 

 

   

[JimandChristy 1,689]

538 average 41.7%

Real clear politics average 43.1%

 

You guys cherry pick ONE poll absolutely hilarious. Mango Mussolini is the worst President in modern history. His approval numbers have been in the ditch probably since February 2017

 

He really is a terrible President, his ceiling in that time has been no better than 45% and he has had thriving economic numbers as well. Really bad approval rating considering.

 

 

[The Nature Boy 7,659]

22 minutes ago, JimandChristy said:

538 average 41.7%

Real clear politics average 43.1%

 

You guys cherry pick ONE poll absolutely hilarious. Mango Mussolini is the worst President in modern history. His approval numbers have been in the ditch probably since February 2017

 

He really is a terrible President, his ceiling in that time has been no better than 45% and he has had thriving economic numbers as well. Really bad approval rating considering.

 

 

I remember 538. They predicted she who walks behind the corn was an almost 100% chance to win lol

[Steeleballz 7,550]

8 minutes ago, Nature Boy Flair said:

I remember 538. They predicted she who walks behind the corn was an almost 100% chance to win lol

 

   Clinton was only ahead by 2-3% in the average of polls after Comey released the letter about her emails. Trump won Michigan, Pensylvania and Wisconsin all by less than 1%.

 

   It wasn't some big blowout that nobody saw coming. Trump squeaked by. He won 3 swing states by the skin of his teeth and that was enough. 

 

  Rassmussen shilled for Trump when no one else thought he would win. Good for them, but I wouldn't chalk it up to accuracy.

[The Nature Boy 7,659]

4 minutes ago, Steeleballz said:

 

   Clinton was only ahead by 2-3% in the average of polls after Comey released the letter about her emails. Trump won Michigan, Pensylvania and Wisconsin all by less than 1%.

 

   It wasn't some big blowout that nobody saw coming. Trump squeaked by. He won 3 swing states by the skin of his teeth and that was enough. 

 

  Rassmussen shilled for Trump when no one else thought he would win. Good for them, but I wouldn't chalk it up to accuracy.

Let me translate, as I speak fluent MDL

Rasmussen predicted a win, win no one else did .

 

 

Maybe they are Clairvoyant, Maybe they got lucky but in the end they were still Korrect

[Steeleballz 7,550]

7 minutes ago, Nature Boy Flair said:

Let me translate, as I speak fluent MDL

Rasmussen predicted a win, win no one else did .

 

 

Maybe they are Clairvoyant, Maybe they got lucky but in the end they were still Korrect

 

  Yes, they predicted a win the same way they get a 50% approval rating for Trump. They over poll conservatives. Same reason they had Obama lower than everyone else. It's not a big deal. That's just what they do. Not sure it's worth high fiving over.

 

   What's next on the list? Trump was the cutest baby ever? According to his mom?

[Voice of Reason 10,298]

3 hours ago, Steeleballz said:

 

   Clinton was only ahead by 2-3% in the average of polls after Comey released the letter about her emails. Trump won Michigan, Pensylvania and Wisconsin all by less than 1%.

 

   It wasn't some big blowout that nobody saw coming. Trump squeaked by. He won 3 swing states by the skin of his teeth and that was enough. 

 

  Rassmussen shilled for Trump when no one else thought he would win. Good for them, but I wouldn't chalk it up to accuracy.

You, sir, must be smoking a substance not legal in ANY state.  The amount of electoral votes our president garnered, as weighed against the odds of Hollary winning, makes it a blowout. I remember news agencies all across America predicting her win.  And announcers breaking down on national TV as Trump pulled ahead.

 

America won that day.

[jg121783 3,921]

18 hours ago, Steeleballz said:

 

   Then you probably want to find something besides Rasmussen. I would suggest using an aggregate if polls are something that is important to you.

An aggregate of inaccurate data gives you inaccurate data. Like I said I am more interested in accuracy than I am in conforming with the results of all the other polls.

 

9 hours ago, Steeleballz said:

 

  Yes, they predicted a win the same way they get a 50% approval rating for Trump. They over poll conservatives. Same reason they had Obama lower than everyone else. It's not a big deal. That's just what they do. Not sure it's worth high fiving over.

 

   What's next on the list? Trump was the cutest baby ever? According to his mom?

Actually most of the other polls oversample democrats by 10-15% but nice try.

[spookyturtle 9,466]

On 8/4/2018 at 5:11 AM, jg121783 said:

An aggregate of inaccurate data gives you inaccurate data. Like I said I am more interested in accuracy than I am in conforming with the results of all the other polls.

 

Actually most of the other polls oversample democrats by 10-15% but nice try.

It's a conspiracy.

[Dashinka 24,758]

On 8/3/2018 at 7:03 PM, Steeleballz said:

 

   Clinton was only ahead by 2-3% in the average of polls after Comey released the letter about her emails. Trump won Michigan, Pensylvania and Wisconsin all by less than 1%.

 

   It wasn't some big blowout that nobody saw coming. Trump squeaked by. He won 3 swing states by the skin of his teeth and that was enough. 

 

  Rassmussen shilled for Trump when no one else thought he would win. Good for them, but I wouldn't chalk it up to accuracy.

So what’s the point?  One poll house leans right and many poll houses lean left, it is just like the mainstream media.

[Dashinka 24,758]

2 hours ago, spookyturtle said:

It's a conspiracy.

Nope, just leftist bias.  The mainstream media is a great example, and poll houses are pretty much an extension of the media.

[spookyturtle 9,466]

5 minutes ago, Bill & Katya said:

Nope, just leftist bias.  The mainstream media is a great example, and poll houses are pretty much an extension of the media.

 Obviously a conspiracy. 

[Dashinka 24,758]

5 minutes ago, spookyturtle said:

 Obviously a conspiracy. 

Like the Trump Russian conspiracy?

[spookyturtle 9,466]

18 minutes ago, Bill & Katya said:

Like the Trump Russian conspiracy?

You post about the leftists all the time. All I posted about the Russian conspiracy was if it were true, we’d have solid information, which we don’t, And I posted that over a year ago.