REPORTERS, CELEBS CALL TRUMP SUPPORTERS ‘NAZIS,’ ‘KKK,’ WANT THEM ‘EUTHANIZED’ AFTER TAMPA RALLY

[Steeleballz 7,550]

2 minutes ago, Cyberfx1024 said:

Yep that source is Drudge. I am not going to lie but I go there a lot to see articles I might have missed somewhere else. 

 

   Drudge is farther away from the mean than any of the mainstream left media though, according to NB's graphic. It looks like Drudge is as far right of the mean as WAPO is left. 

 

   This has always been the chicken and egg question to me. Do the right not want more mainstream sources, or are the extreme sources skewing the information in that direction. Do people just watch the extreme sources because there are no alternatives, or is it because they are saying what people want to hear? I don't know the answer to that.

[Cyberfx1024 7,980]

1 minute ago, smilesammich said:

and there ya go.

What do you mean by that? According to the below statement I would have been in the right because she drove directly at him with a motor vehicle not a scooter. You forget that a motor vehicle is a couple thousand pounds and could have killed or severely wounded him if he was hit. 

As the man began recording the incident on his phone, the woman drove around his car, prompting him to step back into the driver’s side door opening, he told police, according to the report. The woman then drove at him and hit the open door, he said, according to the report.

“She bent my door and I had to lean back to avoid getting hit,” the man wrote. “She also hit the side of my car.”

[Steeleballz 7,550]

5 minutes ago, Cyberfx1024 said:

That woman is lucky because if that was me that she did that to then I would have pulled out my .40 caliber pistol and shot her. I would have got off because driving at someone with a vehicle is putting a life in danger. So it will be me going home to my kids and her dead. 

 

  To be fair, we could cite some fairly recent examples of right leaning people using cars to run down people they disagree with. I'm not sure what point it serves to keep bringing up random incidents. There are bad people on both sides of the political spectrum. We sometimes have to remind those in the middle of the road that you need to look both ways.

[Cyberfx1024 7,980]

Just now, Steeleballz said:

 

  To be fair, we could cite some fairly recent examples of right leaning people using cars to run down people they disagree with. I'm not sure what point it serves to keep bringing up random incidents. There are bad people on both sides of the political spectrum. We sometimes have to remind those in the middle of the road that you need to look both ways.

I know that and I am saying if you are coming at me because of some issue then I WILL SHOT YOU. I do not care what your political affliation or thinking is if you are coming at me with a dang car.

[The Nature Boy 7,659]

8 minutes ago, smilesammich said:

and there ya go.

So it's ok to attack someone because you disagree with them but not if they are trying to run over you.

 

[smilesammich 10,727]

Just now, Nature Boy Flair said:

So it's ok to attack someone because you disagree with them but not if they are trying to run over you.

 

why would you say that?

[Steeleballz 7,550]

3 minutes ago, Nature Boy Flair said:

So it's ok to attack someone because you disagree with them but not if they are trying to run over you.

 

 

   

[Cyberfx1024 7,980]

14 minutes ago, Steeleballz said:

 

   Drudge is farther away from the mean than any of the mainstream left media though, according to NB's graphic. It looks like Drudge is as far right of the mean as WAPO is left. 

 

   This has always been the chicken and egg question to me. Do the right not want more mainstream sources, or are the extreme sources skewing the information in that direction. Do people just watch the extreme sources because there are no alternatives, or is it because they are saying what people want to hear? I don't know the answer to that.

I just like Drudge because it leads me to a lot of articles I have never seen before from places I don't actively go out and check. Come on now there are only so many hours aday that I can sit on VJ. I have to be able to go to some of the sites I monitor on a daily basis which are: LAtimes, Aljazeera, Alarabiya, WSJ, Raleigh News&Obs, and Dailymail. I actually have to spend time doing actual work and with my kids, so that's why Drudge is good because it catalogs a lot of the noteworthy articles. 

[Póg mo 1,749]

42 minutes ago, Steeleballz said:

 

  To be fair, we could cite some fairly recent examples of right leaning people using cars to run down people they disagree with. I'm not sure what point it serves to keep bringing up random incidents. There are bad people across the political spectrum. We sometimes have to remind those in the middle of the road that you need to look both ways.

Fixed it for you. 

Edited August 2, 2018 by Póg mo

[The Nature Boy 7,659]

2 minutes ago, Póg mo said:

Fixed it for you. 

Yup. You sure got your point accross😁

[Póg mo 1,749]

1 minute ago, Nature Boy Flair said:

Yup. You sure got your point accross😁

Don't ccross me😎

[The Nature Boy 7,659]

30 minutes ago, Póg mo said:

Don't ccross me😎

didnt mean to be rude, but I am ocd  about grammer 

Edited August 2, 2018 by Nature Boy Flair

[Dashinka 24,758]

45 minutes ago, Nature Boy Flair said:

didnt mean to be rude, but I am ocd  about grammer 

Now spelling, that is another matter.

 

😜

[The Nature Boy 7,659]

50 minutes ago, Bill & Katya said:

Now spelling, that is another matter.

 

😜

aint speeling part of grammer ?

[Voice of Reason 10,298]

 

9 hours ago, Bill & Katya said:

Hyperbole?

No.  Inability to successfully argue a point, so deflection is in order.