Jump to content

12 posts in this topic

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)

Original Article, NY Times

 

Senator John McCain, Republican of Arizona, declared, “No prior president has ever abased himself more abjectly before a tyrant.”

 

Newt Gingrich, the former House speaker and Trump adviser, declared the news conference “the most serious mistake of his presidency.”

 

Mitt Romney, the 2012 Republican presidential nominee and current Senate candidate from Utah, called it “disgraceful and detrimental to our democratic principles.”

 

It was left to Senator Chuck Schumer of New York, the Democratic leader, to demand actual action. He called for increased sanctions on Russia; for Mr. Trump’s national security team to testify before Congress; for defense of the Department of Justice and other intelligence agencies; and for Mr. Trump to press Mr. Putin to extradite the 12 Russian intelligence agents who were indicted Friday.

 

“In the entire history of our country, Americans have never seen a president of the United States support an adversary the way President Trump has supported President Putin,” Mr. Schumer said. He added: “A single, ominous question now hangs over the White House: What could possibly cause President Trump to put the interests of Russia over those of the United States? Millions of Americans will continue to wonder. The only possible explanation for this dangerous behavior is the possibility that President Putin holds damaging information over President Trump.”

 

Speaker Paul D. Ryan: “The president must appreciate that Russia is not our ally,” he said in a carefully worded statement. “There is no moral equivalence between the United States and Russia, which remains hostile to our most basic values and ideals.”

 

Mr. McCain’s fellow Republican senator from Arizona, Jeff Flake, released his own rebuke “I never thought I would see the day when our American President would stand on the stage with the Russian President and place blame on the United States for Russian aggression. This is shameful.”

 

Senator Lisa Murkowski, Republican Alaska, struck a mournful tone: “Sadly President Trump did not defend America to the Russian president, and for the world to see. Instead, what I saw today was not ‘America First,’ it was simply a sad diminishment of our great nation."

 

Senator Ben Sasse, Republican of Nebraska and a frequent critic of Mr. Trump, echoed the sentiment. “Everyone in this body should be disgusted by what happened in Helsinki today,” he said Monday in a speech on the Senate floor.

Edited by jb914
Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Russia
Timeline
Posted

We may be a little biased in our family, but we don't see Russia as an enemy.

If at first you don't succeed, then sky diving is not for you.

Someone stole my dictionary. Now I am at a loss for words.

If Apple made a car, would it have windows?

Ban shredded cheese. Make America Grate Again .

Give a man a fish and he will eat for a day.  Deport him and you never have to feed him again.

I started out with nothing, and I still have most of it.

I went bald but I kept my comb.  I just couldn't part with it.

My name is not Richard Edward but my friends still call me DickEd

If your pet has a bladder infection, urine trouble.

"Watch out where the huskies go, and don't you eat that yellow snow."

I fired myself from cleaning the house. I didn't like my attitude and I got caught drinking on the job.

My kid has A.D.D... and a couple of F's

Carrots improve your vision.  Alcohol doubles it.

A dung beetle walks into a bar and asks " Is this stool taken?"

Breaking news.  They're not making yardsticks any longer.

Hemorrhoids?  Shouldn't they be called Assteroids?

If life gives you melons, you might be dyslexic.

If you suck at playing the trumpet, that may be why.

Dogs can't take MRI's but Cat scan.

Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Sweden
Timeline
Posted
42 minutes ago, Neonred said:

We may be a little biased in our family, but we don't see Russia as an enemy.

Of course, you don't. But the rest of the world does. Considering how Russia loves to provoke all their neighboring countries. When I was in the military in Sweden it was never a discussion about IF the Russian would come it's a matter of WHEN.





Filed: AOS (pnd) Country: Canada
Timeline
Posted
45 minutes ago, Neonred said:

We may be a little biased in our family, but we don't see Russia as an enemy.

I don't see the Russian people as enemies, I see them as victims of a historically corrupt group of leaders who will use bribery, corruption, extortion, murder and physical threat to gain wealth and power.

Posted
Quote

Semantically, the Walk-Back Walk-Back is reminiscent of the time Trump's lawyer got a lawyer, which prompted the question of how long it would be until Trump's lawyer's lawyer would need a lawyer. But in substance, it greatly resembles Trump's reaction to the fallout to the white supremacist rally in Charlottesville, when he suggested there were "very fine people" marching alongside Nazis—many of whom were chanting his name. It was so uncanny that The Washington Post's Philip Rucker was able to predict this morning's events:

 

If this is Charlottesville redux, then expect Trump to get mad tonight that this afternoon’s do-over, wrong-word excuse didn’t garner glowing headlines, and then come out tomorrow doubling down on what he really wants to say, which is what he said alongside Putin.

 
 

Apparently, being an Artful Dealmaker means being predictable.

But beneath all that, there is no longer even an expectation that the president believes what he says. It is simply accepted that he will say whatever he thinks plays best—in the media or to a rally crowd—in that moment. What he says has no bearing on what he actually thinks or what he will say an hour or a day for now. That's an easy way to operate when you believe reality is whatever you're saying right now, and anything's true if enough people believe it.

https://www.esquire.com/news-politics/a22330619/donald-trump-walk-back-helsinki-vladimir-putin/

philip rucker knows what's up ^_^

Posted
9 minutes ago, Cyberfx1024 said:

Hey your back.... Welcome back

yep recent developments are just too enticing not to indulge. love a good dumpster fire accelerant, and trump is proving to be a gem.

5 minutes ago, Satisfied said:

She’s been back for a while now, just lurking and reading.

well that's creepy.

Posted (edited)

Nice to see the Republicans starting to grow a spine, hopefully soon there will be skeleton.

Edited by JimandChristy

K1 Visa Timeline
15th Dec 08 - I129F posted to VSC
1st June 09 - Interview at 9am, Medical at 2:50pm
15th June 09 - K1 Visa approved and received
23rd June 09 - Point of Entry (Atlanta, Georgia)
17th July 09 - Married


AOS + EAD + AP Timeline
25th Aug 09 - AOS + EAD + AP posted to Chicago Lockbox
2nd Oct 09 - EAD + AP Approved
22nd Oct 09 - AOS Approved
30th Oct 09 - Green Card in hand!


Removing Conditions Timeline
29th Sept 11 - I-751 posted to VSC
26th Sept 12 - Approved

 

Citizenship Timeline

20th Feb 15 - N-400 posted to Lewisville Lockbox

15th June 15 - Interview

1st July 15 - Oath Ceremony

NOW A US CITIZEN!

Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Ecuador
Timeline
Posted
13 hours ago, smilesammich said:

well that's creepy.

Here's one of the 10 winners of the 2000 (?) Bulwer-Lytton contest, wherein one writes only the first line of a bad novel.  (Victorian author Edward George Bulwer-Lytton is famous -- or is it infamous -- for writing the novel that began "It was a dark and stormy night.")

 

7) Andre, a simple peasant, had only one thing on his mind as he crept along the east wall:  Andre creep... Andre creep... Andre creep.

06-04-2007 = TSC stamps postal return-receipt for I-129f.

06-11-2007 = NOA1 date (unknown to me).

07-20-2007 = Phoned Immigration Officer; got WAC#; where's NOA1?

09-25-2007 = Touch (first-ever).

09-28-2007 = NOA1, 23 days after their 45-day promise to send it (grrrr).

10-20 & 11-14-2007 = Phoned ImmOffs; "still pending."

12-11-2007 = 180 days; file is "between workstations, may be early Jan."; touches 12/11 & 12/12.

12-18-2007 = Call; file is with Division 9 ofcr. (bckgrnd check); e-prompt to shake it; touch.

12-19-2007 = NOA2 by e-mail & web, dated 12-18-07 (187 days; 201 per VJ); in mail 12/24/07.

01-09-2008 = File from USCIS to NVC, 1-4-08; NVC creates file, 1/15/08; to consulate 1/16/08.

01-23-2008 = Consulate gets file; outdated Packet 4 mailed to fiancee 1/27/08; rec'd 3/3/08.

04-29-2008 = Fiancee's 4-min. consular interview, 8:30 a.m.; much evidence brought but not allowed to be presented (consul: "More proof! Second interview! Bring your fiance!").

05-05-2008 = Infuriating $12 call to non-English-speaking consulate appointment-setter.

05-06-2008 = Better $12 call to English-speaker; "joint" interview date 6/30/08 (my selection).

06-30-2008 = Stokes Interrogations w/Ecuadorian (not USC); "wait 2 weeks; we'll mail her."

07-2008 = Daily calls to DOS: "currently processing"; 8/05 = Phoned consulate, got Section Chief; wrote him.

08-07-08 = E-mail from consulate, promising to issue visa "as soon as we get her passport" (on 8/12, per DHL).

08-27-08 = Phoned consulate (they "couldn't find" our file); visa DHL'd 8/28; in hand 9/1; through POE on 10/9 with NO hassles(!).

 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
- Back to Top -

Important Disclaimer: Please read carefully the Visajourney.com Terms of Service. If you do not agree to the Terms of Service you should not access or view any page (including this page) on VisaJourney.com. Answers and comments provided on Visajourney.com Forums are general information, and are not intended to substitute for informed professional medical, psychiatric, psychological, tax, legal, investment, accounting, or other professional advice. Visajourney.com does not endorse, and expressly disclaims liability for any product, manufacturer, distributor, service or service provider mentioned or any opinion expressed in answers or comments. VisaJourney.com does not condone immigration fraud in any way, shape or manner. VisaJourney.com recommends that if any member or user knows directly of someone involved in fraudulent or illegal activity, that they report such activity directly to the Department of Homeland Security, Immigration and Customs Enforcement. You can contact ICE via email at Immigration.Reply@dhs.gov or you can telephone ICE at 1-866-347-2423. All reported threads/posts containing reference to immigration fraud or illegal activities will be removed from this board. If you feel that you have found inappropriate content, please let us know by contacting us here with a url link to that content. Thank you.
×
×
  • Create New...