The same day Trump asked Russia to find Hillary Clinton's missing emails, Russians tried to hack Clinton-affiliated emails

[Steeleballz 7,550]

  

   

• An indictment from the special counsel Robert Mueller's office alleges Russian operatives tried to hack email accounts and domains affiliated with Hillary Clinton on the same day Donald Trump called on Russia to find her "missing" emails.
• "Russia, if you're listening, I hope you're able to find the 30,000 emails that are missing," Trump said on July 27, 2016, the same day the indictment says hackers targeted a domain used by Clinton's personal office.
• The special counsel's office on Friday brought criminal charges against 12 Russian intelligence officers suspected of hacking and meddling in the 2016 US election.

http://www.businessinsider.com/trump-russia-emails-hack-clinton-same-day-mueller-2018-7

[Rob and Cheryl 56]

Rooshua I hope you are listening..

 

[Rob and Cheryl 56]

 

[Keith & Arileidi 437]

 Circumstantial at best.

[jg121783 3,915]

So when did the FBI examine Hillary's and the DNC's servers to determine who hacked them or even if they were hacked? Oh that's right they didn't.

[Rob and Cheryl 56]

38 minutes ago, jg121783 said:

So when did the FBI examine Hillary's and the DNC's servers to determine who hacked them or even if they were hacked? Oh that's right they didn't.

How are you able to prove that? I have info to the contrary.

[jg121783 3,915]

2 hours ago, Rob and Cheryl said:

How are you able to prove that? I have info to the contrary.

The DNC refuses to this day to turn their servers over to the FBI. Do you deny that?

[Rob and Cheryl 56]

2 minutes ago, jg121783 said:

The DNC refuses to this day to turn their servers over to the FBI. Do you deny that?

Nobody expects the Spanish Inquisition!

[Voice of Reason 10,298]

On 7/15/2018 at 4:02 PM, Rob and Cheryl said:

Nobody expects the Spanish Inquisition!

Nice deflection.  How about a straight answer to a simple question?

[Dashinka 24,493]

On ‎7‎/‎15‎/‎2018 at 1:54 PM, Rob and Cheryl said:

How are you able to prove that? I have info to the contrary.

You have info that the DNC supplied their servers for analysis by the FBI?  Please provide sources?

[Rob and Cheryl 56]

15 minutes ago, Bill & Katya said:

You have info that the DNC supplied their servers for analysis by the FBI?  Please provide sources?

https://www.google.com/amp/s/gizmodo.com/trump-is-still-rambling-about-a-dumb-theory-that-the-dn-1827645243/amp

 

In March 2017, then-FBI Director James Comey told members of Congress that the DNC’s security contractor, CrowdStrike, had provided an “appropriate substitute” that Motherboard reports is “widely believed” to be such an image of the DNC’s network.

As Johns Hopkins University’s School of Advanced International Studies professor of strategic studies Thomas Rid told the site:

“To keep it simple, let’s say there’s only one server. CrowdStrike goes in, makes a complete image including a memory dump of everything that was in the memory of the server at the time, including traffic and connections at the time,” Rid said. “You have that image from the machine live in the network including its memory content, versus a server that someone physically carries into the FBI headquarters. It’s unplugged, so there’s no memory content because it’s powered down. That physical piece of hardware is less valuable for an investigation than the onsite image and data extraction from a machine that is up and running. The idea a physical server would add any value doesn’t make any sense.”

[Voice of Reason 10,298]

35 minutes ago, Rob and Cheryl said:

https://www.google.com/amp/s/gizmodo.com/trump-is-still-rambling-about-a-dumb-theory-that-the-dn-1827645243/amp

 

In March 2017, then-FBI Director James Comey told members of Congress that the DNC’s security contractor, CrowdStrike, had provided an “appropriate substitute” that Motherboard reports is “widely believed” to be such an image of the DNC’s network.

As Johns Hopkins University’s School of Advanced International Studies professor of strategic studies Thomas Rid told the site:

“To keep it simple, let’s say there’s only one server. CrowdStrike goes in, makes a complete image including a memory dump of everything that was in the memory of the server at the time, including traffic and connections at the time,” Rid said. “You have that image from the machine live in the network including its memory content, versus a server that someone physically carries into the FBI headquarters. It’s unplugged, so there’s no memory content because it’s powered down. That physical piece of hardware is less valuable for an investigation than the onsite image and data extraction from a machine that is up and running. The idea a physical server would add any value doesn’t make any sense.”

Is this the same Comey that said Hillary did no wrong with her email server?  The same guy who was later fired?  Perhaps it’s just me, but I don’t have much confidence in him any longer.

[Rob and Cheryl 56]

3 minutes ago, Satisfied said:

Is this the same Comey that said Hillary did no wrong with her email server?  The same guy who was later fired?  Perhaps it’s just me, but I don’t have much confidence in him any longer.

I was asked to provide evidence that the "server" was handed over to the FBI

[Dashinka 24,493]

1 hour ago, Rob and Cheryl said:

https://www.google.com/amp/s/gizmodo.com/trump-is-still-rambling-about-a-dumb-theory-that-the-dn-1827645243/amp

 

In March 2017, then-FBI Director James Comey told members of Congress that the DNC’s security contractor, CrowdStrike, had provided an “appropriate substitute” that Motherboard reports is “widely believed” to be such an image of the DNC’s network.

As Johns Hopkins University’s School of Advanced International Studies professor of strategic studies Thomas Rid told the site:

“To keep it simple, let’s say there’s only one server. CrowdStrike goes in, makes a complete image including a memory dump of everything that was in the memory of the server at the time, including traffic and connections at the time,” Rid said. “You have that image from the machine live in the network including its memory content, versus a server that someone physically carries into the FBI headquarters. It’s unplugged, so there’s no memory content because it’s powered down. That physical piece of hardware is less valuable for an investigation than the onsite image and data extraction from a machine that is up and running. The idea a physical server would add any value doesn’t make any sense.”

Is Comey credible?  Btw, could have the DNC and Crowdstrike faked a hack?

[Steeleballz 7,550]

4 hours ago, Rob and Cheryl said:

I was asked to provide evidence that the "server" was handed over to the FBI

 

   Obviously you failed to anticipate that the goalpost was about to be moved. Now please - either provide the evidence that Hillary doesn't have reptilian DNA, or concede the argument.