Jump to content

21 posts in this topic

Recommended Posts

Posted
On 7/6/2018 at 12:45 AM, pushbrk said:

The lawyer has done nothing wrong, so there is nothing to report.  Lawyers speaking directly to clients are not governed by Visa Journey terms of service.  Only the law.

So advising someone to commit fraud is "nothing wrong"? Hm. All right. Also wondering if you think I'm an idiot who just suggested they reported the lawyer here on VJ? I mean, really? 

K1

29.11.2013 - NoA1

06.02.2014 - NoA2

01.04.2014 - Interview. 

AoS

03.2015 - AoS started.

09.2015 - Green Card received.  

RoC

24.07.2017 - NoA1.

01.08.2018 - RoC approved. 

 

 

Filed: Other Country: China
Timeline
Posted
5 hours ago, Roel said:

So advising someone to commit fraud is "nothing wrong"? Hm. All right. Also wondering if you think I'm an idiot who just suggested they reported the lawyer here on VJ? I mean, really? 

My opinion about you personally is not relevant.  I'm going to conclude the "lawyer" did their due diligence and gave proper legal advice after assessing their full circumstances and matching those circumstances with applicable legal precedent.  I do NOT conclude the full circumstances discussed with their lawyer necessarily match exactly the usually "condensed" version of facts disclosed here, or that either you or I are qualified to provide the applicable "legal advice" to this couple.  What I DO know is that many folks adjust status from non-immigrant visas or the Canadian Visitor Privilege DAILY and the VJ has an entire forum dedicated to such discussion.  I'm pretty sure there's a good reason for both those truths.  In fact, I'm absolutely certain of it. :rolleyes:

Facts are cheap...knowing how to use them is precious...
Understanding the big picture is priceless. Anonymous

Google Who is Pushbrk?

A Warning to Green Card Holders About Voting

http://www.visajourney.com/forums/topic/606646-a-warning-to-green-card-holders-about-voting/

Filed: Timeline
Posted
28 minutes ago, pushbrk said:

My opinion about you personally is not relevant.  I'm going to conclude the "lawyer" did their due diligence and gave proper legal advice after assessing their full circumstances and matching those circumstances with applicable legal precedent.  I do NOT conclude the full circumstances discussed with their lawyer necessarily match exactly the usually "condensed" version of facts disclosed here, or that either you or I are qualified to provide the applicable "legal advice" to this couple.  What I DO know is that many folks adjust status from non-immigrant visas or the Canadian Visitor Privilege DAILY and the VJ has an entire forum dedicated to such discussion.  I'm pretty sure there's a good reason for both those truths.  In fact, I'm absolutely certain of it. :rolleyes:

Your opinion as you stated.  Others are entitled to their opinions.  

You stated that you are not qualified to proved the applicable "legal advice" to this couple but you do not hesitate to conclude that  the lawyer "did their due diligence and gave proper legal advice."   How did you make this conclusion when you're not qualified to provide the applicable "legal advice?"  You're not qualified, but you can make a conclusion that it was proper.  You can't have it both ways.

 

People are free to report their lawyers to the local bar.  Whether it's something the bar will discipline the lawyer for is another matter.  People are entitled to be heard even if they don't succeed in getting the bar to discipline the lawyer.  

 

Filed: Other Country: China
Timeline
Posted
1 hour ago, Jojo92122 said:

Your opinion as you stated.  Others are entitled to their opinions.  

You stated that you are not qualified to proved the applicable "legal advice" to this couple but you do not hesitate to conclude that  the lawyer "did their due diligence and gave proper legal advice."   How did you make this conclusion when you're not qualified to provide the applicable "legal advice?"  You're not qualified, but you can make a conclusion that it was proper.  You can't have it both ways.

 

People are free to report their lawyers to the local bar.  Whether it's something the bar will discipline the lawyer for is another matter.  People are entitled to be heard even if they don't succeed in getting the bar to discipline the lawyer.  

 

Actually, I CAN have it both ways, just like the person I responded to can render a legal opinion that is false.  Free to report, is certainly true. Free to make a fool of themselves and waste their time is also true.  I'll hold myself out to be better qualified to judge if the attorney gave good advice than the person I disagreed with.  You are entitled to your opinion as well and to express it.  Opinions vary.  They always have.

Facts are cheap...knowing how to use them is precious...
Understanding the big picture is priceless. Anonymous

Google Who is Pushbrk?

A Warning to Green Card Holders About Voting

http://www.visajourney.com/forums/topic/606646-a-warning-to-green-card-holders-about-voting/

Posted

Nobody knows what the lawyer actually said, except possibly the OP.

We do know what the OP stated that the lawyer said, which is not a legal path for them at this time.

Timelines:

ROC:

Spoiler

7/27/20: Sent forms to Dallas lockbox, 7/30/20: Received by USCIS, 8/10 NOA1 electronic notification received, 8/1/ NOA1 hard copy received

AOS:

Spoiler

AOS (I-485 + I-131 + I-765):

9/25/17: sent forms to Chicago, 9/27/17: received by USCIS, 10/4/17: NOA1 electronic notification received, 10/10/17: NOA1 hard copy received. Social Security card being issued in married name (3rd attempt!)

10/14/17: Biometrics appointment notice received, 10/25/17: Biometrics

1/2/18: EAD + AP approved (no website update), 1/5/18: EAD + AP mailed, 1/8/18: EAD + AP approval notice hardcopies received, 1/10/18: EAD + AP received

9/5/18: Interview scheduled notice, 10/17/18: Interview

10/24/18: Green card produced notice, 10/25/18: Formal approval, 10/31/18: Green card received

K-1:

Spoiler

I-129F

12/1/16: sent, 12/14/16: NOA1 hard copy received, 3/10/17: RFE (IMB verification), 3/22/17: RFE response received

3/24/17: Approved! , 3/30/17: NOA2 hard copy received

 

NVC

4/6/2017: Received, 4/12/2017: Sent to Riyadh embassy, 4/16/2017: Case received at Riyadh embassy, 4/21/2017: Request case transfer to Manila, approved 4/24/2017

 

K-1

5/1/2017: Case received by Manila (1 week embassy transfer??? Lucky~)

7/13/2017: Interview: APPROVED!!!

7/19/2017: Visa in hand

8/15/2017: POE

 

Filed: Lift. Cond. (apr) Country: China
Timeline
Posted

***Immediately cease and desist with all bickering or Administrative Action will be taken.***

Our journey:

Spoiler

September 2007: Met online via social networking site (MySpace); began exchanging messages.
March 26, 2009: We become a couple!
September 10, 2009: Arrived for first meeting in-person!
June 17, 2010: Arrived for second in-person meeting and start of travel together to other areas of China!
June 21, 2010: Engaged!!!
September 1, 2010: Switched course from K1 to CR-1
December 8, 2010: Wedding date set; it will be on February 18, 2011!
February 9, 2011: Depart for China
February 11, 2011: Registered for marriage in Wuhan, officially married!!!
February 18, 2011: Wedding ceremony in Shiyan!!!
April 22, 2011: Mailed I-130 to Chicago
April 28, 2011: Received NOA1 via text/email, file routed to CSC (priority date April 25th)
April 29, 2011: Updated
May 3, 2011: Received NOA1 hardcopy in mail
July 26, 2011: Received NOA2 via text/email!!!
July 30, 2011: Received NOA2 hardcopy in mail
August 8, 2011: NVC received file
September 1, 2011: NVC case number assigned
September 2, 2011: AOS invoice received, OPTIN email for EP sent
September 7, 2011: Paid AOS bill (payment portal showed PAID on September 9, 2011)
September 8, 2011: OPTIN email accepted, GZO number assigned
September 10, 2011: Emailed AOS package
September 12, 2011: IV bill invoiced
September 13, 2011: Paid IV bill (payment portal showed PAID on September 14, 2011)
September 14, 2011: Emailed IV package
October 3, 2011: Emailed checklist response (checklist generated due to typo on Form DS-230)
October 6, 2011: Case complete at NVC
November 10, 2011: Interview - APPROVED!!!
December 7, 2011: POE - Sea-Tac Airport

September 17, 2013: Mailed I-751 to CSC

September 23, 2013: Received NOA1 in mail (receipt date September 19th)

October 16, 2013: Biometrics Appointment

January 28, 2014: Production of new Green Card ordered

February 3, 2014: New Green Card received; done with USCIS until fall of 2023*

December 18, 2023:  Filed I-90 to renew Green Card

December 21, 2023:  Production of new Green Card ordered - will be seeing USCIS again every 10 years for renewal

 

 
Didn't find the answer you were looking for? Ask our VJ Immigration Lawyers.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
- Back to Top -

Important Disclaimer: Please read carefully the Visajourney.com Terms of Service. If you do not agree to the Terms of Service you should not access or view any page (including this page) on VisaJourney.com. Answers and comments provided on Visajourney.com Forums are general information, and are not intended to substitute for informed professional medical, psychiatric, psychological, tax, legal, investment, accounting, or other professional advice. Visajourney.com does not endorse, and expressly disclaims liability for any product, manufacturer, distributor, service or service provider mentioned or any opinion expressed in answers or comments. VisaJourney.com does not condone immigration fraud in any way, shape or manner. VisaJourney.com recommends that if any member or user knows directly of someone involved in fraudulent or illegal activity, that they report such activity directly to the Department of Homeland Security, Immigration and Customs Enforcement. You can contact ICE via email at Immigration.Reply@dhs.gov or you can telephone ICE at 1-866-347-2423. All reported threads/posts containing reference to immigration fraud or illegal activities will be removed from this board. If you feel that you have found inappropriate content, please let us know by contacting us here with a url link to that content. Thank you.
×
×
  • Create New...