Jump to content
Steeleballz

Senate panel upholds finding that Russia backed Trump

By Steeleballz in Current Events and Hot Social Topics

 Share

24 posts in this topic

Recommended Posts

Rob and Cheryl Enthusiast

Rob and Cheryl   56

Posted
Filed: AOS (pnd) Country: Canada
 Timeline
Posted
7 hours ago, jg121783 said:

Both candidates knew the rules going in and Trump had the better strategy for gaining electoral votes. Popular vote is irrelevant here. If the election was about popular vote I am sure all candidates would have used a different strategy and Trump may have won the popular vote. It's a moot point because we are getting into a hypothetical situation. What is more important is who won by the rules that were in place during the election and everything else is basically irrelevant. People need to seriously stop whining about an election that happened almost 2 years ago and move on.

The question was asked "So the Russians wanted Trump to win?  No kidding.  Who didn’t?  " And I answered it.  No whining or psychological distressed involved. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Rob and Cheryl Enthusiast

Rob and Cheryl   56

Posted
Filed: AOS (pnd) Country: Canada
 Timeline
Posted
7 hours ago, Satisfied said:

And yet, he’s our president.  Amazing how it works, eh?  

I was  answering your question:

"So the Russians wanted Trump to win?  No kidding.  Who didn’t?  "

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Voice of Reason Grand Master

Voice of Reason   10,298

Posted
Filed: Timeline
Posted
2 hours ago, Rob and Cheryl said:

I was  answering your question:

"So the Russians wanted Trump to win?  No kidding.  Who didn’t?  "

Yes, you attempted to use the fact that Trump had a few less popular votes.  But those don’t decide the outcome, obviously.  And I am sure that Russia isn’t the only country who would prefer the outcome we had.  Not that it really matters, but that’s my opinion.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Steeleballz Mentor

Steeleballz   7,550

Posted
Timeline
  • Author
Posted
3 minutes ago, Satisfied said:

Yes, you attempted to use the fact that Trump had a few less popular votes.  But those don’t decide the outcome, obviously.  And I am sure that Russia isn’t the only country who would prefer the outcome we had.  Not that it really matters, but that’s my opinion.

 

   Not that I cared what other countries wanted, but I would say North Korea seems to be happy with our current regime. Other than that, I don't think the list of countries who preferred Trump is that long.

 

   The bottom line is other countries can have their preferences about what they would like the USA to be, but they should not be participating in our election process. 

995507-quote-moderation-in-all-things-an

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Voice of Reason Grand Master

Voice of Reason   10,298

Posted
Filed: Timeline
Posted
19 minutes ago, Steeleballz said:

 

   Not that I cared what other countries wanted, but I would say North Korea seems to be happy with our current regime. Other than that, I don't think the list of countries who preferred Trump is that long.

 

   The bottom line is other countries can have their preferences about what they would like the USA to be, but they should not be participating in our election process. 

I agree with the interference part.  And I am sure there were countries with which Hillary already some deals brokered that were unhappy to see Trump win.  But overall, I believe most countries were happier to see Trump in office (minus the current tariff situation).

Link to comment
Share on other sites
TBoneTX Grand Master

TBoneTX   45,284

Posted
Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Ecuador
 Timeline
Posted

Wonder how many international kickbacks the Clinton Foundation unexpectedly had to refund after the election...

06-04-2007 = TSC stamps postal return-receipt for I-129f.

06-11-2007 = NOA1 date (unknown to me).

07-20-2007 = Phoned Immigration Officer; got WAC#; where's NOA1?

09-25-2007 = Touch (first-ever).

09-28-2007 = NOA1, 23 days after their 45-day promise to send it (grrrr).

10-20 & 11-14-2007 = Phoned ImmOffs; "still pending."

12-11-2007 = 180 days; file is "between workstations, may be early Jan."; touches 12/11 & 12/12.

12-18-2007 = Call; file is with Division 9 ofcr. (bckgrnd check); e-prompt to shake it; touch.

12-19-2007 = NOA2 by e-mail & web, dated 12-18-07 (187 days; 201 per VJ); in mail 12/24/07.

01-09-2008 = File from USCIS to NVC, 1-4-08; NVC creates file, 1/15/08; to consulate 1/16/08.

01-23-2008 = Consulate gets file; outdated Packet 4 mailed to fiancee 1/27/08; rec'd 3/3/08.

04-29-2008 = Fiancee's 4-min. consular interview, 8:30 a.m.; much evidence brought but not allowed to be presented (consul: "More proof! Second interview! Bring your fiance!").

05-05-2008 = Infuriating $12 call to non-English-speaking consulate appointment-setter.

05-06-2008 = Better $12 call to English-speaker; "joint" interview date 6/30/08 (my selection).

06-30-2008 = Stokes Interrogations w/Ecuadorian (not USC); "wait 2 weeks; we'll mail her."

07-2008 = Daily calls to DOS: "currently processing"; 8/05 = Phoned consulate, got Section Chief; wrote him.

08-07-08 = E-mail from consulate, promising to issue visa "as soon as we get her passport" (on 8/12, per DHL).

08-27-08 = Phoned consulate (they "couldn't find" our file); visa DHL'd 8/28; in hand 9/1; through POE on 10/9 with NO hassles(!).

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Keith & Arileidi Proficient

Keith & Arileidi   437

Posted
Filed: IR-1/CR-1 Visa Country: Dominican Republic
 Timeline
Posted (edited)
On 7/4/2018 at 1:22 AM, Steeleballz said:

 

   You didn't read the article, huh? :D

They never read the articles. 😂

Edited by Keith & Arileidi
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Keith & Arileidi Proficient

Keith & Arileidi   437

Posted
Filed: IR-1/CR-1 Visa Country: Dominican Republic
 Timeline
Posted
13 hours ago, TBoneTX said:

Wonder how many international kickbacks the Clinton Foundation unexpectedly had to refund after the election...

Probably alot.. but check out that Clinton deflection. 😎

Link to comment
Share on other sites
 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing
- Back to Top -

Important Disclaimer: Please read carefully the Visajourney.com Terms of Service. If you do not agree to the Terms of Service you should not access or view any page (including this page) on VisaJourney.com. Answers and comments provided on Visajourney.com Forums are general information, and are not intended to substitute for informed professional medical, psychiatric, psychological, tax, legal, investment, accounting, or other professional advice. Visajourney.com does not endorse, and expressly disclaims liability for any product, manufacturer, distributor, service or service provider mentioned or any opinion expressed in answers or comments. VisaJourney.com does not condone immigration fraud in any way, shape or manner. VisaJourney.com recommends that if any member or user knows directly of someone involved in fraudulent or illegal activity, that they report such activity directly to the Department of Homeland Security, Immigration and Customs Enforcement. You can contact ICE via email at Immigration.Reply@dhs.gov or you can telephone ICE at 1-866-347-2423. All reported threads/posts containing reference to immigration fraud or illegal activities will be removed from this board. If you feel that you have found inappropriate content, please let us know by contacting us here with a url link to that content. Thank you.
×
×
  • Create New...