Jump to content
The Nature Boy

Trump accuses 'low IQ' Rep. Waters of advocating 'harm' against his supporters

By The Nature Boy in Current Events and Hot Social Topics

 Share

34 posts in this topic

Recommended Posts

jg121783 Experienced

jg121783   3,915

Posted
Filed: IR-1/CR-1 Visa Country: Philippines
 Timeline
Posted
15 minutes ago, Cyberfx1024 said:

I like him alot I do. I actually know 2 people that are from that district that can file absentee ballot from NC due to being military. 

I live in WI so I have no say in that election but I have looked into him and it is really no contest when it comes to him versus mad Maxine. I read that mad Maxine actually had to open a campaign office for the first time in many years because of how good Navarro is doing. Less time she has every day to polish her chrome dome before putting on the James Brown wig I guess.

morfunphil1_zpsoja67jml.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites
  • Replies 33
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Popular Posts

jg121783
jg121783

Omar Navarro for Congress. Because at this point anyone can do a better job than Mad Maxine. By the way James Brown wants his hair back.

Mr&Mrs G.
Mr&Mrs G.

He might unify both sides by saying Waters has a low iq    Although you can already hear her scream nazi's when the staffers try defend themselves. 

Dashinka
Dashinka

JW is getting into the mix.   https://www.judicialwatch.org/press-room/press-releases/judicial-watch-files-house-ethics-complaint-against-maxine-waters-for-inciting-violence-and-assaults-on-

TBoneTX Grand Master

TBoneTX   45,291

Posted
Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Ecuador
 Timeline
Posted
8 hours ago, Keith & Arileidi said:

I think there's another very possible outcome... 

Rhetoric like water's could very well breed an extremely left wing populist candidate. 

Which would be the death of America. 

Your words strike a chord because of what Rush said just today, in reference to a primary outcome on the other coast:

https://www.rushlimbaugh.com/daily/2018/06/27/dems-and-drive-bys-confused-by-crowley-upset/

 

He limited his inferences to the death of the Democrat party, however.

Interesting reading, and fodder for more discussion here.

 

06-04-2007 = TSC stamps postal return-receipt for I-129f.

06-11-2007 = NOA1 date (unknown to me).

07-20-2007 = Phoned Immigration Officer; got WAC#; where's NOA1?

09-25-2007 = Touch (first-ever).

09-28-2007 = NOA1, 23 days after their 45-day promise to send it (grrrr).

10-20 & 11-14-2007 = Phoned ImmOffs; "still pending."

12-11-2007 = 180 days; file is "between workstations, may be early Jan."; touches 12/11 & 12/12.

12-18-2007 = Call; file is with Division 9 ofcr. (bckgrnd check); e-prompt to shake it; touch.

12-19-2007 = NOA2 by e-mail & web, dated 12-18-07 (187 days; 201 per VJ); in mail 12/24/07.

01-09-2008 = File from USCIS to NVC, 1-4-08; NVC creates file, 1/15/08; to consulate 1/16/08.

01-23-2008 = Consulate gets file; outdated Packet 4 mailed to fiancee 1/27/08; rec'd 3/3/08.

04-29-2008 = Fiancee's 4-min. consular interview, 8:30 a.m.; much evidence brought but not allowed to be presented (consul: "More proof! Second interview! Bring your fiance!").

05-05-2008 = Infuriating $12 call to non-English-speaking consulate appointment-setter.

05-06-2008 = Better $12 call to English-speaker; "joint" interview date 6/30/08 (my selection).

06-30-2008 = Stokes Interrogations w/Ecuadorian (not USC); "wait 2 weeks; we'll mail her."

07-2008 = Daily calls to DOS: "currently processing"; 8/05 = Phoned consulate, got Section Chief; wrote him.

08-07-08 = E-mail from consulate, promising to issue visa "as soon as we get her passport" (on 8/12, per DHL).

08-27-08 = Phoned consulate (they "couldn't find" our file); visa DHL'd 8/28; in hand 9/1; through POE on 10/9 with NO hassles(!).

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Keith & Arileidi Proficient

Keith & Arileidi   437

Posted
Filed: IR-1/CR-1 Visa Country: Dominican Republic
 Timeline
Posted (edited)
6 hours ago, TBoneTX said:

Your words strike a chord because of what Rush said just today, in reference to a primary outcome on the other coast:

https://www.rushlimbaugh.com/daily/2018/06/27/dems-and-drive-bys-confused-by-crowley-upset/

 

He limited his inferences to the death of the Democrat party, however.

Interesting reading, and fodder for more discussion here.

 

It is definitely an interesting read. 

I think he's mostly right , but I remember hearing about a Democrat that has had quite a bit of success in a heavy trump districts. So the Dems have her touring the country, coaching prospective candidates on how they become more appealing to the average trump voter. 

 

The two issues she pointed out (that I can remember).

1.democrats aren't approachable by the rural white working class because they like to use their higher degrees as kind of a status symbol. 

2. Democrats tend to start off meetings with divisive issues such as gun control.

Edited by Keith & Arileidi
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Keith & Arileidi Proficient

Keith & Arileidi   437

Posted
Filed: IR-1/CR-1 Visa Country: Dominican Republic
 Timeline
Posted
14 hours ago, jg121783 said:

If the republicans want to get rid of mad Maxine they should really get more behind Omar Navarro. He actually has a shot at beating her.

We need to get all of the mad people out of office 😏

 

https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/donald-trump-incitement-violence/

Link to comment
Share on other sites
jg121783 Experienced

jg121783   3,915

Posted
Filed: IR-1/CR-1 Visa Country: Philippines
 Timeline
Posted
1 hour ago, Keith & Arileidi said:

We need to get all of the mad people out of office 😏

 

https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/donald-trump-incitement-violence/

:rofl::rofl::rofl:

 

Snopes. The fact that anyone would take some weird cat lady as an authority on anything is quite humorous.

morfunphil1_zpsoja67jml.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Voice of Reason Grand Master

Voice of Reason   10,298

Posted
Filed: Timeline
Posted
5 minutes ago, jg121783 said:

:rofl::rofl::rofl:

 

Snopes. The fact that anyone would take some weird cat lady as an authority on anything is quite humorous.

And her now estranged husband is prohibited from revealing the “secrets behind snopes”.  Nothing to see here...

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Keith & Arileidi Proficient

Keith & Arileidi   437

Posted
Filed: IR-1/CR-1 Visa Country: Dominican Republic
 Timeline
Posted
54 minutes ago, jg121783 said:

:rofl::rofl::rofl:

 

Snopes. The fact that anyone would take some weird cat lady as an authority on anything is quite humorous.

What about the simple article are you disputing? 

29 minutes ago, Steeleballz said:

 

  Dang. After the sources I've seen you use for "news". 

Ikr.

He ussually posts conservative tabloids as his news. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
TBoneTX Grand Master

TBoneTX   45,291

Posted
Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Ecuador
 Timeline
Posted
4 hours ago, Keith & Arileidi said:

1.democrats aren't approachable by the rural white working class because they like to use their higher degrees as kind of a status symbol. 

2. Democrats tend to start off meetings with divisive issues such as gun control.

Both are valid.  However, can they manage to get away from these?  It would seem to be a process over a long time, rather than an immediate accomplishment with concomitant success.

9 minutes ago, Satisfied said:

Anyone here think she will actually be forced to resign?  

Negatory.  Even to suggest this means that you are a racist and a bigot.

06-04-2007 = TSC stamps postal return-receipt for I-129f.

06-11-2007 = NOA1 date (unknown to me).

07-20-2007 = Phoned Immigration Officer; got WAC#; where's NOA1?

09-25-2007 = Touch (first-ever).

09-28-2007 = NOA1, 23 days after their 45-day promise to send it (grrrr).

10-20 & 11-14-2007 = Phoned ImmOffs; "still pending."

12-11-2007 = 180 days; file is "between workstations, may be early Jan."; touches 12/11 & 12/12.

12-18-2007 = Call; file is with Division 9 ofcr. (bckgrnd check); e-prompt to shake it; touch.

12-19-2007 = NOA2 by e-mail & web, dated 12-18-07 (187 days; 201 per VJ); in mail 12/24/07.

01-09-2008 = File from USCIS to NVC, 1-4-08; NVC creates file, 1/15/08; to consulate 1/16/08.

01-23-2008 = Consulate gets file; outdated Packet 4 mailed to fiancee 1/27/08; rec'd 3/3/08.

04-29-2008 = Fiancee's 4-min. consular interview, 8:30 a.m.; much evidence brought but not allowed to be presented (consul: "More proof! Second interview! Bring your fiance!").

05-05-2008 = Infuriating $12 call to non-English-speaking consulate appointment-setter.

05-06-2008 = Better $12 call to English-speaker; "joint" interview date 6/30/08 (my selection).

06-30-2008 = Stokes Interrogations w/Ecuadorian (not USC); "wait 2 weeks; we'll mail her."

07-2008 = Daily calls to DOS: "currently processing"; 8/05 = Phoned consulate, got Section Chief; wrote him.

08-07-08 = E-mail from consulate, promising to issue visa "as soon as we get her passport" (on 8/12, per DHL).

08-27-08 = Phoned consulate (they "couldn't find" our file); visa DHL'd 8/28; in hand 9/1; through POE on 10/9 with NO hassles(!).

Link to comment
Share on other sites
 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing
- Back to Top -

Important Disclaimer: Please read carefully the Visajourney.com Terms of Service. If you do not agree to the Terms of Service you should not access or view any page (including this page) on VisaJourney.com. Answers and comments provided on Visajourney.com Forums are general information, and are not intended to substitute for informed professional medical, psychiatric, psychological, tax, legal, investment, accounting, or other professional advice. Visajourney.com does not endorse, and expressly disclaims liability for any product, manufacturer, distributor, service or service provider mentioned or any opinion expressed in answers or comments. VisaJourney.com does not condone immigration fraud in any way, shape or manner. VisaJourney.com recommends that if any member or user knows directly of someone involved in fraudulent or illegal activity, that they report such activity directly to the Department of Homeland Security, Immigration and Customs Enforcement. You can contact ICE via email at Immigration.Reply@dhs.gov or you can telephone ICE at 1-866-347-2423. All reported threads/posts containing reference to immigration fraud or illegal activities will be removed from this board. If you feel that you have found inappropriate content, please let us know by contacting us here with a url link to that content. Thank you.
×
×
  • Create New...