Immigrant Children Cry Out in Audio Recorded at Detention Center

[Unidentified 2,930]

2 minutes ago, Steeleballz said:

 

   In all fairness, Obama got the label of anti-Christ from more than a few on here, which probably trumps Hitler.

No I don't think it trumps Hitler. They're probably on the same level. Though as an atheist I could be wrong... 

[Steeleballz 7,550]

43 minutes ago, Nature Boy Flair said:

To be fair that was when race was the subject of almost every post, odd we have not seen that lately 

 

  A lot of people got time outs not for the contents of a single post, but for carrying on way past the point of getting warnings over and over for multiple posts. If the offending post seemed somewhat benign, often it was the cumulative effect of several posts that were not.

[Voice of Reason 10,298]

3 hours ago, Steeleballz said:

 

  A lot of people got time outs not for the contents of a single post, but for carrying on way past the point of getting warnings over and over for multiple posts. If the offending post seemed somewhat benign, often it was the cumulative effect of several posts that were not.

Not a lot, and not even most of the time.  Because say something negative about Obama, and you were labeled racist, reported, ad got gulag time, no woranings needed.  Ditto muslims.  There were some as you mention, and they are long gone now, on both sides.  

At one point, there was a metric butt-load of reporting going on, and even secret FB groups of people who talked about posters here and ganged up on the reports to get people kicked.  Thankfully, that lasted even less time than the Dodo birds...

[Boiler 45,486]

Well saying something negative about Obama is racist after all.

[Ban Hammer 13,334]

https://www.aclu.org/blog/mass-incarceration/unnecessary-incarceration/president-obama-wants-continue-imprisoning

[Voice of Reason 10,298]

12 minutes ago, Ban Hammer said:

https://www.aclu.org/blog/mass-incarceration/unnecessary-incarceration/president-obama-wants-continue-imprisoning

Too funny!!  When I clicked on your link, I got a banner that was asking for donations to help the ACLU stop the Trump admin from deporting families.

[Unidentified 2,930]

3 hours ago, IDWAF said:

Not a lot, and not even most of the time.  Because say something negative about Obama, and you were labeled racist, reported, ad got gulag time, no woranings needed.  Ditto muslims.  There were some as you mention, and they are long gone now, on both sides.  

At one point, there was a metric butt-load of reporting going on, and even secret FB groups of people who talked about posters here and ganged up on the reports to get people kicked.  Thankfully, that lasted even less time than the Dodo birds...

Well yeah, the TOS on that is pretty clear: Post Content intended to degrade, intimidate, or incite violence or prejudicial action against a broad demographic or group of people identified by a unifying trait or characteristic (discrimination). For instance, racist or sexist content may be considered hate speech.

[Steeleballz 7,550]

3 hours ago, IDWAF said:

Not a lot, and not even most of the time.  Because say something negative about Obama, and you were labeled racist, reported, ad got gulag time, no woranings needed.  Ditto muslims.  There were some as you mention, and they are long gone now, on both sides.  

At one point, there was a metric butt-load of reporting going on, and even secret FB groups of people who talked about posters here and ganged up on the reports to get people kicked.  Thankfully, that lasted even less time than the Dodo birds...

 

   I think there may be some mis-remembering going on here, and it's not coming from me.  Negative comments specifically about Obama are not against the TOS. Racist comments are. Failing to stop bickering or constantly detracting from other's use of the forum by repeating the same thing over and over after being warned are definitely against the TOS. The problem for some is by the time they realized they went overboard, they were already sunk. 

 

   

[Voice of Reason 10,298]

1 hour ago, Unidentified said:

Well yeah, the TOS on that is pretty clear: Post Content intended to degrade, intimidate, or incite violence or prejudicial action against a broad demographic or group of people identified by a unifying trait or characteristic (discrimination). For instance, racist or sexist content may be considered hate speech.

Totally not what we are talking about, sorry.

[Boiler 45,486]

4 hours ago, IDWAF said:

Too funny!!  When I clicked on your link, I got a banner that was asking for donations to help the ACLU stop the Trump admin from deporting families.

Me too, nice to see the SJW's have a sense of humour.