Jump to content

2,986 posts in this topic

Recommended Posts

Posted
39 minutes ago, VA21202 said:

Awesome! Yup I think the more volume we can demonstrate and email, the better it is. Thanks! I hope we can collect 5-10 folks from here and if so I’ll type out the email and paste it here. We can then align on when (date/time) to send this out so it’s a consolidated, persistent effort. I don’t think there’s any harm in adding the office of the Ambassador on CC line along with the NVC, but we can decide that later for sure.

I'm in!

Filed: FB-2 Visa Country: Canada
Timeline
Posted
1 hour ago, VA21202 said:

Awesome! Yup I think the more volume we can demonstrate and email, the better it is. Thanks! I hope we can collect 5-10 folks from here and if so I’ll type out the email and paste it here. We can then align on when (date/time) to send this out so it’s a consolidated, persistent effort. I don’t think there’s any harm in adding the office of the Ambassador on CC line along with the NVC, but we can decide that later for sure.

Although I’m not an EB applicant, I would be interested joining. 

Posted
5 hours ago, VA21202 said:

Yes, sure I think the FB folks engaged here can send this email along with us since we’re essentially in the same neglected boat. 

Is there anyway you can provide us with your email address, and then we can each provide you with ours, so that we all have the same template?

Posted
4 hours ago, Sorrel said:

Is there anyway you can provide us with your email address, and then we can each provide you with ours, so that we all have the same template?

I’ll probably add it as a tab on the tracker or will share the link to a Google doc with the template on it. So hopefully you all should be able to just copy paste and send it. 

Filed: IR-1/CR-1 Visa Country: Canada
Timeline
Posted
21 hours ago, CanadianMD said:

When one group is waiting more than two years to receive their interview date, compared to the other group that is waiting less than 6 months to receive their interview, tell me this is not a discrepancy created by Montreal Consulate?

 

The government mandate to prioritize reunification of family has expired and is no longer valid. This is now Montreal's discretion to create such a huge discrepancy in wait time between the two groups. This deserves more attention.

Could you please share the source of the removal of the prioritisation guidelines? I am interested because applicants in the immediate family categories are under  the impression it is still in place…. Would help to know what the current guideline is.

 
Didn't find the answer you were looking for? Ask our VJ Immigration Lawyers.
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
- Back to Top -

Important Disclaimer: Please read carefully the Visajourney.com Terms of Service. If you do not agree to the Terms of Service you should not access or view any page (including this page) on VisaJourney.com. Answers and comments provided on Visajourney.com Forums are general information, and are not intended to substitute for informed professional medical, psychiatric, psychological, tax, legal, investment, accounting, or other professional advice. Visajourney.com does not endorse, and expressly disclaims liability for any product, manufacturer, distributor, service or service provider mentioned or any opinion expressed in answers or comments. VisaJourney.com does not condone immigration fraud in any way, shape or manner. VisaJourney.com recommends that if any member or user knows directly of someone involved in fraudulent or illegal activity, that they report such activity directly to the Department of Homeland Security, Immigration and Customs Enforcement. You can contact ICE via email at Immigration.Reply@dhs.gov or you can telephone ICE at 1-866-347-2423. All reported threads/posts containing reference to immigration fraud or illegal activities will be removed from this board. If you feel that you have found inappropriate content, please let us know by contacting us here with a url link to that content. Thank you.
×
×
  • Create New...