Question about financial income of US petitioner

[cedrichadjian 7]

12 minutes ago, Michael2017 said:

Ok, but don`t be confident that your case gets approved. This is on the VERY low side and you have a weak case. You must be clear about that.

I don't have a weak case, I have lots of evidence to prove that I have a bona fide relationship. Until the interview, we'd be together for about 1 year and I believe it's enough. Nevertheless, my mom, uncle and grandma will move to France after a couple of months to live with my other uncle,  our plan B is to get married in France and apply for spouse visa, if that also doesn't work, we'll figure out a way to move to France together since my mother would already be in France and he can obtain work visa or something.

Edited May 19, 2018 by cedrichadjian

[Michael2017 368]

4 minutes ago, cedrichadjian said:

I don't have a weak case, I have lots of evidence to prove that I have a bona fide relationship. Until the interview, we'd be together for about 1 year and I believe it's enough. Nevertheless, my mom, uncle and grandma will move to France after a couple of months to live with my other uncle,  our plan B is to get married in France and apply for spouse visa, if that also doesn't work, we'll figure out a way to move to France together since my mother would already be in France and he can obtain work visa or something.

Well, you seem not to listen. The duration of your online relationship does not matter much. What matters really is how much time you spend together in real life. There have been cases refused where the USC lived even for several months in the foreign country, I know even of a case where they lived together for years, and they still don`t believe it is a real relationship but that the foreigner tries to trick the USC to get a visa. So you telling us "I dont have a weak case" is as ridiculous as it can get. Good luck with your case you seem not to listen....

 

[cedrichadjian 7]

2 minutes ago, Michael2017 said:

Well, you seem not to listen. The duration of your online relationship does not matter much. What matters really is how much time you spend together in real life. There have been cases refused where the USC lived even for several months in the foreign country, I know even of a case where they lived together for years, and they still don`t believe it is a real relationship but that the foreigner tries to trick the USC to get a visa. So you telling us "I dont have a weak case" is as ridiculous as it can get. Good luck with your case you seem not to listen....

 

I suggest you read this and get informed instead of acting negatively and accusing us of visa fraud: 

PS: I've also read some cases where the couple has been together for more than 2 years and still got rejected. If you have a reliable article that states that 1 week of meeting isn't enough, please go ahead and share it with me so we can act accordingly.

 

[Cathi 5,755]

You cannot work at all until you have your work permit, even if it's online. Work is work is work.

[cedrichadjian 7]

Just now, Cathi said:

You cannot work at all until you have your work permit, even if it's online. Work is work is work.

I see. Thank you.

[Cathi 5,755]

2 hours ago, adil-rafa said:

although same sex marriage is now allowed in Tennessee (since 2015) ,  if not allowed in Lebonon you can be denied if it is not the norm there

(we have seen it reported here ) 

the high fraud countries are shown on this site

https://mypathtocitizenship.com/which-countries-are-on-the-uscis-high-fraud-list/

 

so, you can check out by the photo

the embassy will be more interested in how much time (quality face time)  you have seen each other, whether or not there is a big age difference,  a religious background difference 

you ae safe with the 100% poverty level income for K1 but wiill need 125% for AOS after marriage

 

Not true. They are getting married in the US, they cannot be denied because same sex marriage is legal in the US.

[Cathi 5,755]

49 minutes ago, Michael2017 said:

Well, to be honest, deciding to get married after a couple of days spend together sounds ridiculous and fraudulent to a neutral person.

Why on earth would anyone want to get married after 1 week face time if it was not for visa purposes. I would not be confident that a case with 7 days face time gets approved.  Of course, it could be. I have spend 5 full years with my wife together before we decided to get married in the 6th year, and still some may consider this a rush. We are now together since 8 years. I think the norm would be to live together for a year or two before deciding to get married. 7 days sounds like a real joke to me. Sorry but for an outsider this is just ridiculous low amount of face time to decide to get married.

The only eligibility for a k-1 visa is that they've met at least once prior to the two years that they apply for a k-1. Opinions don't matter, the law does. It's perfectly legal for them to file. He didn't come asking for judgments, he came to ask for advice.

[Michael2017 368]

1 minute ago, Cathi said:

The only eligibility for a k-1 visa is that they've met at least once prior to the two years that they apply for a k-1. Opinions don't matter, the law does. It's perfectly legal for them to file. He didn't come asking for judgments, he came to ask for advice.

Exactly, and the advice is to have more face time. 100s of others have been refused, the law gives the power to the CO, and it is just ridiculous to marry after 7 days spend together. It is screaming ridiculous and any CO will think the same. 

[Cathi 5,755]

1 minute ago, Michael2017 said:

Exactly, and the advice is to have more face time. 100s of others have been refused, the law gives the power to the CO, and it is just ridiculous to marry after 7 days spend together. It is screaming ridiculous and any CO will think the same. 

We see people on here every single day who get approved with little face time. I agree, the more the better but it isn't an automatic denial. My husband and I married on my first trip to Jordan and we had no problem being approved.

[cedrichadjian 7]

Just now, Michael2017 said:

Exactly, and the advice is to have more face time. 100s of others have been refused, the law gives the power to the CO, and it is just ridiculous to marry after 7 days spend together. It is screaming ridiculous and any CO will think the same. 

He CAN'T visit me until next year, he works and can't take leaves whenever he wants to. And I don't think me visiting him is a good idea because chances are my visa application would get refused and this would be a huge minus for K-1.

[Cathi 5,755]

1 minute ago, Cathi said:

We see people on here every single day who get approved with little face time. I agree, the more the better but it isn't an automatic denial. My husband and I married on my first trip to Jordan and we had no problem being approved.

PS. We has many so called 'red flags'. I'm 21 years older, divorced with 2 children and a different religion. We didn't have any issues with anything.

[Michael2017 368]

1 minute ago, Cathi said:

We see people on here every single day who get approved with little face time. I agree, the more the better but it isn't an automatic denial. My husband and I married on my first trip to Jordan and we had no problem being approved.

No one said it would be an automatic denial. What I said, and what was disputed by the OT is that 

 

a) 7 days is very low

b) It is rather a weak case

 

No one judged, no one said it will be denied. Those two points above seem to be true and this is all I can say. 

I don`t think you can call it a rock solid strong case...

2 minutes ago, cedrichadjian said:

He CAN'T visit me until next year, he works and can't take leaves whenever he wants to. And I don't think me visiting him is a good idea because chances are my visa application would get refused and this would be a huge minus for K-1.

No minus at all for K1. Your refusal would actually work for you as you proof that you want to visit him.

[cedrichadjian 7]

2 minutes ago, Michael2017 said:

No minus at all for K1. Your refusal would actually work for you as you proof that you want to visit him.

I read somewhere that it would be a minus as the CO would suspect there's something suspicious.

[Michael2017 368]

5 minutes ago, cedrichadjian said:

I read somewhere that it would be a minus as the CO would suspect there's something suspicious.

No, wrong again. The opposite, it will be good for you.

[cedrichadjian 7]

5 minutes ago, Michael2017 said:

No, wrong again. The opposite, it will be good for you.

Okay and during my interview with the CO (for B-2 visa), when he/she asks why I want to visit US, and if I tell him/her that I want to spend time with my fiance until k-1 process is over, would it be ok?