Question about change in income

[NicolaBolton87 161]

I'm not quite sure how to explain this so bear with me..

I'm in England, my fiance is the US petitioner and we received our NOA2 in March for our I-129F application. My medical is on the 10th May and my interview on the 22nd. I have all the financial evidence required for my interview including payslips for the last 6 months, a letter from Nick's employer stating that his job is permanent and how much he makes annually and the affidavit of support.

Nick is an automotive detailer. His pay for the entire process and currently, is annual. He gets the same rate of pay each paycheck so this was easy enough to get evidence for. He has been made flat rate as of Saturday which means he will be making a hell of a lot more money but I'm not sure how to evidence this. On paper, his hourly rate of pay is less than what he earns currently BUT he will be earning up to double what he makes per paycheck now. If we ask his employer for a new letter stating his job and his pay it's going to show that on paper we don't meet the requirements. The lowest amount of hours he pulls each day is 12 but can be up to 25 so he will be making more money - we know this..but I can't think how we can evidence this other than proof by payslips but by the time I go for my interview in 3 weeks time he will only have 1 or 2 payslips.

 

Hopefully this will make sense and I'm grateful for any advice.

[Wuozopo 4,293]

I think if the evidence you already have is over the threshold, then I wouldn't worry about it. Making more money doesn't get you more approved.  Work out a new financial package with new paychecks for your AOS affidavit of support. 

[NicolaBolton87 161]

32 minutes ago, Wuozopo said:

I think if the evidence you already have is over the threshold, then I wouldn't worry about it. Making more money doesn't get you more approved.  Work out a new financial package with new paychecks for your AOS affidavit of support. 

Thank you so much, this was my initial thought but I didn't want to be dishonest about anything. That's a good point though, I can work on gathering evidence for the new rate of pay for AOS.

[Wuozopo 4,293]

33 minutes ago, NicolaBolton87 said:

Thank you so much, this was my initial thought but I didn't want to be dishonest about anything. That's a good point though, I can work on gathering evidence for the new rate of pay for AOS.

 

I would say dishonest would be if he lost his job and you used the previous job info to get a visa, even though his "current" situation was unemployed and zero income.