SPLC Cashes In On Trump Era; Controversial Nonprofit Nears Half BILLION In Assets

[Dashinka 24,766]

6 minutes ago, smilesammich said:

he defended a kkk member and then, felt bad about it and stopped defended kkk members. events as you're asserting them and reality do not match.

end of the day, he can label people however he wants, that has no bearing on the outcome of the cases. he's not the judge and jury.

Doesn’t the SPLC label folks pretty much always?

[smilesammich 10,727]

3 minutes ago, Bill & Katya said:

Doesn’t the SPLC label folks pretty much always?

they call out racists. not sure why this upsets anyone.

[Dashinka 24,766]

3 minutes ago, smilesammich said:

they call out racists. not sure why this upsets anyone.

Like Ben Carson?

[smilesammich 10,727]

51 minutes ago, Bill & Katya said:

Like Ben Carson?

did you not catch where they retracted and apologized for that file? 

[jg121783 3,921]

1 hour ago, smilesammich said:

they call out racists. not sure why this upsets anyone.

Nothing wrong with calling out actual racists. SPLC doesn't do that though. They falsely label groups and people they disagree with as racists. Big difference.

[smilesammich 10,727]

1 hour ago, jg121783 said:

Nothing wrong with calling out actual racists. SPLC doesn't do that though. They falsely label groups and people they disagree with as racists. Big difference.

examples?

[Amica Nostra 4,803]

28 minutes ago, smilesammich said:

examples?

What she said, Examples?

[jg121783 3,921]

32 minutes ago, smilesammich said:

examples?

 

4 minutes ago, Amica Nostra said:

What she said, Examples?

How about you give me examples of how one of these groups is racist instead of asking me to prove a negative. Let's start with Daily Caller.

[Amica Nostra 4,803]

4 minutes ago, jg121783 said:

 

How about you give me examples of how one of these groups is racist instead of asking me to prove a negative. Let's start with Daily Caller.

we are not asking the imposssible, to prove a negative, we are asking for you to back this statement up 

" They falsely label groups and people they disagree with as racists. Big difference."

[jg121783 3,921]

6 minutes ago, Amica Nostra said:

we are not asking the imposssible, to prove a negative, we are asking for you to back this statement up 

" They falsely label groups and people they disagree with as racists. Big difference."

I understand you can't prove many of these groups are in fact racists. Even the specific example I gave you. Usually the burden of proof is on the side alleging guilt. But I understand you along with the SPLC would rather accuse people and groups of being racist then try to shift the burden of proof to the accused. I'll give you one more chance to prove the Daily Caller is racist or I'm just gonna assume you don't have a leg to stand on and move on.

[smilesammich 10,727]

15 minutes ago, jg121783 said:

I understand you can't prove many of these groups are in fact racists. Even the specific example I gave you. Usually the burden of proof is on the side alleging guilt. But I understand you along with the SPLC would rather accuse people and groups of being racist then try to shift the burden of proof to the accused. I'll give you one more chance to prove the Daily Caller is racist or I'm just gonna assume you don't have a leg to stand on and move on.

go to the splc website, search daily caller, and read the articles. pretty simple.

[Amica Nostra 4,803]

1 hour ago, jg121783 said:

I understand you can't prove many of these groups are in fact racists. Even the specific example I gave you. Usually the burden of proof is on the side alleging guilt. But I understand you along with the SPLC would rather accuse people and groups of being racist then try to shift the burden of proof to the accused. I'll give you one more chance to prove the Daily Caller is racist or I'm just gonna assume you don't have a leg to stand on and move on.

You are accusing me of what?

[Dashinka 24,766]

8 hours ago, smilesammich said:

did you not catch where they retracted and apologized for that file? 

Yep, ruin the guy first since he is not following the Left Wing narrative, then apologize.  You know what they say, one aw shucks wipes out a 1000 attaboys.  Persoanlly, I could not care less about the SPLC, they are a Left Wing group that labels extremist right wing hate groups while ignoring the extremist Left Wing hate groups.  I do find it funny that the supposedly unbiased media treats them as some sort of neutral expert source.

[smilesammich 10,727]

3 hours ago, Bill & Katya said:

Yep, ruin the guy first since he is not following the Left Wing narrative, then apologize.  You know what they say, one aw shucks wipes out a 1000 attaboys.  Persoanlly, I could not care less about the SPLC, they are a Left Wing group that labels extremist right wing hate groups while ignoring the extremist Left Wing hate groups.  I do find it funny that the supposedly unbiased media treats them as some sort of neutral expert source.

ruin the guy?

is 'left wing group' not a label?

[Dashinka 24,766]

2 hours ago, smilesammich said:

ruin the guy?

is 'left wing group' not a label?

Only the SPLC can throw around labels?