SPLC Cashes In On Trump Era; Controversial Nonprofit Nears Half BILLION In Assets

[jg121783 3,915]

http://dailycaller.com/2018/04/21/splc-nonprofit-assets/

 

 

[smilesammich 10,727]

wonder why daily caller has beef with splc?

 

oh yeah...

https://www.splcenter.org/hatewatch/2017/08/16/daily-caller-has-white-nationalist-problem

[jg121783 3,915]

SPLC is a joke. Anyone right of Stalin is a KKK member (which by the way they got their start defending in court) to them. Wonder what that money stashed in the Cayman islands is used for.

Edited April 23, 2018 by jg121783

[smilesammich 10,727]

1 minute ago, jg121783 said:

SPLC is a joke. Anyone right of Stalin is a KKK member to them. Wonder what that money stashed in the Cayman islands is used for.

i would say daily caller is a joke but, really not funny.

https://www.splcenter.org/about/financial-information

[jg121783 3,915]

10 minutes ago, smilesammich said:

i would say daily caller is a joke but, really not funny.

https://www.splcenter.org/about/financial-information

Not as much of a joke as a group that got their start defending the KKK in court then realized it is more profitable to virtue signal to the radical left.

[smilesammich 10,727]

7 minutes ago, jg121783 said:

Not as much of a joke as a group that got their start defending the KKK in court then realized it is more profitable to virtue signal to the radical left.

splc accomplish way more than virtue signal, maybe you should look into what they actually do.

[jg121783 3,915]

1 hour ago, smilesammich said:

splc accomplish way more than virtue signal, maybe you should look into what they actually do.

I know exactly what they do. The bully anyone who opposes the radical left agenda by pushing a false narrative that they are racist. Kind of like Hitler accusing his opposition of being anti semites. Perhaps you should look into their history.

[smilesammich 10,727]

1 minute ago, jg121783 said:

I know exactly what they do. The bully anyone who opposes the radical left agenda by pushing a false narrative that they are racist. Kind of like Hitler accusing his opposition of being anti semites. Perhaps you should look into their history.

given what you've said about them thus far, i don't think you do. reading over their case docket, doesn't look like they're 'bullying anyone who opposes the radical left agenda' to me. the hitler comparison is really uncalled for, do you have any specifics here?

https://www.splcenter.org/seeking-justice/case-docket

[jg121783 3,915]

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Morris_Dees

 

"In his 1991 autobiography^[10] Dees wrote that in 1962 he represented Ku Klux Klan member Claude Henley who faced Federal charges for attacking Freedom Riders in an incident documented by a Life magazine photographer. When Dees learned that another lawyer had asked for $15,000 to represent Henley, Dees offered to do the job for $5,000, roughly the median household salary in America at the time. Dees's defense helped Henley earn an acquittal. But Dees said he later experienced an "epiphany" and regretted his defense of Henley."

 

The only thing he regrets is that anyone knows what he did.

[smilesammich 10,727]

2 minutes ago, jg121783 said:

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Morris_Dees

 

"In his 1991 autobiography^[10] Dees wrote that in 1962 he represented Ku Klux Klan member Claude Henley who faced Federal charges for attacking Freedom Riders in an incident documented by a Life magazine photographer. When Dees learned that another lawyer had asked for $15,000 to represent Henley, Dees offered to do the job for $5,000, roughly the median household salary in America at the time. Dees's defense helped Henley earn an acquittal. But Dees said he later experienced an "epiphany" and regretted his defense of Henley."

 

The only thing he regrets is that anyone knows what he did.

normally people don't include stuff they don't want people to know about them in their autobiography.

 

[jg121783 3,915]

2 hours ago, smilesammich said:

normally people don't include stuff they don't want people to know about them in their autobiography.

 

I'm sure people already knew about it. But nice try.

[smilesammich 10,727]

1 minute ago, jg121783 said:

I'm sure people already knew about it. But nice try.

people already knowing has nothing to do with your assertion that he regrets 'anyone knowing' what he put in his book. i didn't "try" anything, just pointing out the holes in your logic. 

[bcking 3,157]

2 hours ago, jg121783 said:

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Morris_Dees

 

"In his 1991 autobiography^[10] Dees wrote that in 1962 he represented Ku Klux Klan member Claude Henley who faced Federal charges for attacking Freedom Riders in an incident documented by a Life magazine photographer. When Dees learned that another lawyer had asked for $15,000 to represent Henley, Dees offered to do the job for $5,000, roughly the median household salary in America at the time. Dees's defense helped Henley earn an acquittal. But Dees said he later experienced an "epiphany" and regretted his defense of Henley."

 

The only thing he regrets is that anyone knows what he did.

Or perhaps he did something for money in his 20's that he later realized was wrong, and so founded a company dedicated to standing up against people that he once represented.

 

 

Or sure he is just really upset people found out about it, and so he wrote about it himself in his own autobiography. That makes way more sense...

 

[jg121783 3,915]

10 minutes ago, bcking said:

Or perhaps he did something for money in his 20's that he later realized was wrong, and so founded a company dedicated to standing up against people that he once represented.

 

 

Or sure he is just really upset people found out about it, and so he wrote about it himself in his own autobiography. That makes way more sense...

 

It actually does make sense. If people already knew about it him writing about it gave him a chance to change the narrative and claim it was something he regretted. All I know is after that case his track record didn't get much better. He has made a career of labeling almost every group right of Mao as racists, anti semites, ect. with no basis in fact or reality whatsoever. The SPLC is a joke and is only taken seriously by some on the radical left.

[smilesammich 10,727]

4 minutes ago, jg121783 said:

It actually does make sense. If people already knew about it him writing about it gave him a chance to change the narrative and claim it was something he regretted. All I know is after that case his track record didn't get much better. He has made a career of labeling almost every group right of Mao as racists, anti semites, ect. with no basis in fact or reality whatsoever. The SPLC is a joke and is only taken seriously by some on the radical left.

he defended a kkk member and then, felt bad about it and stopped defended kkk members. events as you're asserting them and reality do not match.

end of the day, he can label people however he wants, that has no bearing on the outcome of the cases. he's not the judge and jury.