Village Bans Semi-Automatic Weapons, Residents Must Remove From Home Or Face Up To $1,000 Fines — Per Day

[Voice of Reason 10,298]

I remember several here saying that no one wants to take guns away from lawful owners.  

 

Uh huh.

 

https://www.dailywire.com/news/29050/village-bans-semi-automatic-weapons-residents-must-joseph-curl?utm_source=facebook&utm_medium=social&utm_content=062316-news&utm_campaign=dwbrand 

[Sonea 138]

How will they enforce this? 

[Voice of Reason 10,298]

7 minutes ago, Sonea said:

How will they enforce this? 

Mostly thru honest citizens, I would imagine.  But also, the police may be able to access gun registry data they the NCIS or FBI (not sure if this is possible, or legal).

[Sonea 138]

5 minutes ago, IDWAF said:

Mostly thru honest citizens, I would imagine.  But also, the police may be able to access gun registry data they the NCIS or FBI (not sure if this is possible, or legal).

They passed this based on features. So all you have to do is remove a "feature" from the rifle while its stored in the village  lol. They weren't the sharpest lol.

 

Edited April 5, 2018 by Sonea

[Voice of Reason 10,298]

I saw a phrase today that I agree with, just wish everyone could grasp the logic behind it.

 

”There are hundreds of millions of gun owners in this country, and not a single one will have an accident today.  The only misuse of guns comes in environments where there are drugs, alcohol, bad parents, and undisciplined children.  Period.”

[Amica Nostra 4,803]

37 minutes ago, IDWAF said:

I saw a phrase today that I agree with, just wish everyone could grasp the logic behind it.

 

”There are hundreds of millions of gun owners in this country, and not a single one will have an accident today.  The only misuse of guns comes in environments where there are drugs, alcohol, bad parents, and undisciplined children.  Period.”

Period?  What about fighting spouses and family members? Jealous boyfriends?  mental illness? Ex spouses? 

[Steeleballz 7,550]

 

  IIRC from a previous thread, wouldn't people who need the banned weapons just start a new village?

[Amica Nostra 4,803]

18 minutes ago, Steeleballz said:

 

  IIRC from a previous thread, wouldn't people who need the banned weapons just start a new village?

genius idea, housing communities with Gun Ownership built into the covenant. 

[Dashinka 24,766]

8 hours ago, Il Mango Dulce said:

Period?  What about fighting spouses and family members? Jealous boyfriends?  mental illness? Ex spouses? 

Are those gun accidents, or human nature?

[RLA 324]

24 minutes ago, Bill & Katya said:

Are those gun accidents, or human nature?

Accidents are human nature.  The issue is that gun accidents tend to effect way more damage than, say, spoon accidents.  Hence we don't see the need to regulate the right of the people to keep and bear spoons.  

[Dashinka 24,766]

1 hour ago, RLA said:

Accidents are human nature.  The issue is that gun accidents tend to effect way more damage than, say, spoon accidents.  Hence we don't see the need to regulate the right of the people to keep and bear spoons.  

How about knives?  Seems to be a lot of knife accidents happening now days, particularly in the UK.

[jg121783 3,921]

Now all the criminals know where to go to find defenseless victims. If I lived in that town I would be making arrangements to move immediately.

[Amica Nostra 4,803]

2 hours ago, Bill & Katya said:

Are those gun accidents, or human nature?

"The only misuse of guns"

Was the operative phrase. I don't think misuse is limited to accidents.

[Cyberfx1024 7,980]

10 hours ago, Il Mango Dulce said:

Period?  What about fighting spouses and family members? Jealous boyfriends?  mental illness? Ex spouses? 

A lot of those are done by knives not guns.

[Jacque67 7,328]

9 hours ago, Steeleballz said:

 

  IIRC from a previous thread, wouldn't people who need the banned weapons just start a new village?

Precisely.