I-751 February 2017 Filers, Part II

[gc@gc 184]

2 hours ago, shell20 said:

Im sure on the 2nd one I can see a picture of the Statue of liberty, however it may be a shadow not, sure cant get a complete close up and I don't want to raise your hopes. Whatever it is its progress in the right direction.

 

 

yeah,  the 2nd one should be something really good

[shell20 746]

2 minutes ago, gc@gc said:

 

 

yeah,  the 2nd one should be something really good

Can you see it too, or is it just me? I see a crown and isn't a crown at the top of the torch. I don't want to get hopes up here, but I am sure I see some kind of picture going on there. I can't zoom into as its not the best pic.

[gc@gc 184]

21 minutes ago, shell20 said:

Can you see it too, or is it just me? I see a crown and isn't a crown at the top of the torch. I don't want to get hopes up here, but I am sure I see some kind of picture going on there. I can't zoom into as its not the best pic.

 

seems a crown to me, but just like you, not 100% for sure 

[shell20 746]

16 minutes ago, gc@gc said:

 

seems a crown to me, but just like you, not 100% for sure 

Oh good, means I am not going loopy loop just yet!

[shell20 746]

27 minutes ago, gc@gc said:

 

seems a crown to me, but just like you, not 100% for sure 

Actually looking at it again, Im not sure it is a crown, looks like it might be typing, however why would CSC write after the field office did. As one was posted around the 16th from CSC and the other from the field office.  Surely if they transferred a case it would be the other way around?  And the mystery deepens! 

 

[gc@gc 184]

5 minutes ago, shell20 said:

Actually looking at it again, Im not sure it is a crown, looks like it might be typing, however why would CSC write after the field office did. As one was posted around the 16th from CSC and the other from the field office.  Surely if they transferred a case it would be the other way around?  And the mystery deepens! 

 

 

well, with your former employer or buddy,  anything can happen, without reasons at all, you should know better 

 

 

[Ck207 35]

So my case has never been transfer to Nebraska or Texas. Does it mean it will take longer? 

 

Also, how do I request to get a 1 year stamp instead of 6 months? 

[shell20 746]

1 minute ago, Ck207 said:

So my case has never been transfer to Nebraska or Texas. Does it mean it will take longer? 

 

Also, how do I request to get a 1 year stamp instead of 6 months? 

Just because you have had no word yet, doesnt mean you wont hear in the future, someone has two letters from USCIS today in the mail. Waiting to hear what they say to give us all more clarity as to what might be going on.  As for the stamp, unfortunately its up to the field office, normally its a year but some only 6 months.

[corvusheart 163]

3 hours ago, shell20 said:

The second one to me looks like it has a crown or something going on. Its probably one letter from the field office and one from the service centre but it looks promising. Oh the wait.

One is to Indianapolis and the other to Florida. Two different destinations. So one of them has to be for someone else. Look at the addressee section.

Edited April 19, 2018 by corvusheart
Grammar corrections

[corvusheart 163]

It's still strange someone else's letter showed up in his informed delivery especially since informed delivery works by your address alone. It's possible the Florida peice was misbarcoded with an Indiana zip code meter on the bottom of the letter which you wouldn't be able to see on here. Then the DBCS machine would read it as an Indiana letter until a clerk at the destination post office corrects it in mark-up.

[L&S1984 0]

hi all,

sorry for stupid question. wondering if my process is normal.

02/02/17 Filled i751 at CSC

02/12/17 NOA1

03/03/17 Biometrics

long time nothing

04/06/18 reviewed case, not found anything and send to center of service in nevada, because of jurisdiction?

 

Does it mean I need to wait till the new service center reviews my case again? Would I potentially have a interview in Nevada?

Is this a bad sign? Thanks for any feedback or experience with this jurisdiction note.

Thanks again

[shell20 746]

55 minutes ago, corvusheart said:

One is to Indianapolis and the other to Florida. Two different destinations. So one of them has to be for someone else. Look at the addressee section.

There were three letters I think

[shell20 746]

1 hour ago, corvusheart said:

One is to Indianapolis and the other to Florida. Two different destinations. So one of them has to be for someone else. Look at the addressee section.

Thats strange as I am sure I saw three letters.  I need to go back now and look.

[shell20 746]

55 minutes ago, corvusheart said:

It's still strange someone else's letter showed up in his informed delivery especially since informed delivery works by your address alone. It's possible the Florida peice was misbarcoded with an Indiana zip code meter on the bottom of the letter which you wouldn't be able to see on here. Then the DBCS machine would read it as an Indiana letter until a clerk at the destination post office corrects it in mark-up.

Sorry doubled post about the letters as was outside on my mobile and didn't realise it went through. There were three letters. Two from Indianapolis.

[shell20 746]

20 minutes ago, L&S1984 said:

hi all,

sorry for stupid question. wondering if my process is normal.

02/02/17 Filled i751 at CSC

02/12/17 NOA1

03/03/17 Biometrics

long time nothing

04/06/18 reviewed case, not found anything and send to center of service in nevada, because of jurisdiction?

 

Does it mean I need to wait till the new service center reviews my case again? Would I potentially have a interview in Nevada?

Is this a bad sign? Thanks for any feedback or experience with this jurisdiction note.

Thanks again

Nevada thats a new one unless you live in that jurisdiction, it would then mean its gone to your local office for either review or to set up an interview.