Jump to content

31 posts in this topic

Recommended Posts

Filed: IR-1/CR-1 Visa Country: Jamaica
Timeline
Posted
6 minutes ago, Jer1234 said:

Good day to all..had the same question. 

Was bored and saw okcupid it was free to use and I met my wife on it..we just started to talk as friends  den afterwards our feelings developed naturally ..shes visited me twice in Jamaica already in my home country. . ..didn't pay any fee whatsoever ...and didn't see anything about IMB..where stil waiting for our case to be approved. We have a very genuine marriage .thanks in advance for the positive feedback:)

 

Screenshot_2018-02-25-20-54-54-1.png

Filed: K-1 Visa Country: Canada
Timeline
Posted

I saw one user who met their significant other on a dating site (match I think it was) and they emailed customer support asking to confirm they were not an IBM site. The dating site wrote back to confirm they were not and attached their terms of service which the petitioner then printed out. This was sufficient apparently because his application was approved. 

Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Ecuador
Timeline
Posted

Threads about okcupid are in the IMBRA subforum, where this thread is now moved.

06-04-2007 = TSC stamps postal return-receipt for I-129f.

06-11-2007 = NOA1 date (unknown to me).

07-20-2007 = Phoned Immigration Officer; got WAC#; where's NOA1?

09-25-2007 = Touch (first-ever).

09-28-2007 = NOA1, 23 days after their 45-day promise to send it (grrrr).

10-20 & 11-14-2007 = Phoned ImmOffs; "still pending."

12-11-2007 = 180 days; file is "between workstations, may be early Jan."; touches 12/11 & 12/12.

12-18-2007 = Call; file is with Division 9 ofcr. (bckgrnd check); e-prompt to shake it; touch.

12-19-2007 = NOA2 by e-mail & web, dated 12-18-07 (187 days; 201 per VJ); in mail 12/24/07.

01-09-2008 = File from USCIS to NVC, 1-4-08; NVC creates file, 1/15/08; to consulate 1/16/08.

01-23-2008 = Consulate gets file; outdated Packet 4 mailed to fiancee 1/27/08; rec'd 3/3/08.

04-29-2008 = Fiancee's 4-min. consular interview, 8:30 a.m.; much evidence brought but not allowed to be presented (consul: "More proof! Second interview! Bring your fiance!").

05-05-2008 = Infuriating $12 call to non-English-speaking consulate appointment-setter.

05-06-2008 = Better $12 call to English-speaker; "joint" interview date 6/30/08 (my selection).

06-30-2008 = Stokes Interrogations w/Ecuadorian (not USC); "wait 2 weeks; we'll mail her."

07-2008 = Daily calls to DOS: "currently processing"; 8/05 = Phoned consulate, got Section Chief; wrote him.

08-07-08 = E-mail from consulate, promising to issue visa "as soon as we get her passport" (on 8/12, per DHL).

08-27-08 = Phoned consulate (they "couldn't find" our file); visa DHL'd 8/28; in hand 9/1; through POE on 10/9 with NO hassles(!).

Filed: Lift. Cond. (pnd) Country: Japan
Timeline
Posted

We met initially on Facebook, and didn't send the tos(didn't get noa2 yet though) however I don't think we saw rfe asking for Facebook TOS for a long time unless mentioned a specific group that the couple met.

when it's a specific group I think it becomes more important to show that group was not specifically arranging marriages.

 

under normal circumstance Facebook is known enough for not being an imb.

 

however if you'll be sending, TOS will be enough for facebook.

Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Ecuador
Timeline
Posted

Some posts and replies have been split from this thread into a new thread in the IMBRA subforum:  "Is My Site an IMB?  [split topic]."

06-04-2007 = TSC stamps postal return-receipt for I-129f.

06-11-2007 = NOA1 date (unknown to me).

07-20-2007 = Phoned Immigration Officer; got WAC#; where's NOA1?

09-25-2007 = Touch (first-ever).

09-28-2007 = NOA1, 23 days after their 45-day promise to send it (grrrr).

10-20 & 11-14-2007 = Phoned ImmOffs; "still pending."

12-11-2007 = 180 days; file is "between workstations, may be early Jan."; touches 12/11 & 12/12.

12-18-2007 = Call; file is with Division 9 ofcr. (bckgrnd check); e-prompt to shake it; touch.

12-19-2007 = NOA2 by e-mail & web, dated 12-18-07 (187 days; 201 per VJ); in mail 12/24/07.

01-09-2008 = File from USCIS to NVC, 1-4-08; NVC creates file, 1/15/08; to consulate 1/16/08.

01-23-2008 = Consulate gets file; outdated Packet 4 mailed to fiancee 1/27/08; rec'd 3/3/08.

04-29-2008 = Fiancee's 4-min. consular interview, 8:30 a.m.; much evidence brought but not allowed to be presented (consul: "More proof! Second interview! Bring your fiance!").

05-05-2008 = Infuriating $12 call to non-English-speaking consulate appointment-setter.

05-06-2008 = Better $12 call to English-speaker; "joint" interview date 6/30/08 (my selection).

06-30-2008 = Stokes Interrogations w/Ecuadorian (not USC); "wait 2 weeks; we'll mail her."

07-2008 = Daily calls to DOS: "currently processing"; 8/05 = Phoned consulate, got Section Chief; wrote him.

08-07-08 = E-mail from consulate, promising to issue visa "as soon as we get her passport" (on 8/12, per DHL).

08-27-08 = Phoned consulate (they "couldn't find" our file); visa DHL'd 8/28; in hand 9/1; through POE on 10/9 with NO hassles(!).

Filed: K-1 Visa Country: Brazil
Timeline
Posted
10 hours ago, TinaMah said:

I am supposed to get proof that Facebook is not an IMB, but I absolutely cannot find this information anywhere.

For those of you who met online, how did you supply this?

 

Thank you so much!

 

Tina

you don't need to prove this. Everybody knows, including uscis what facebook is and its nature. a social network is not an IMB. I think you have every right to run an extra mile and add this on your form, but it's not necessary whatsoever. good luck.

Filed: K-1 Visa Country: United Kingdom
Timeline
Posted

I have a feeling that USCIS are aware that Facebook is not IMBRA... just a feeling.

MY PERSONAL K-1 VISA APPLICATION PROCESS
(In progress)


I-192F sent: 6/7/2017

I-129F arrived (by USPS): 6/12/2017 (Date recorded on NOA1)

NOA1 email received: 6/14/2017

NOA1 hard copy recieved: 6/19/2017

RFE Recieved: 12/30/2017

RFE response sent: 1/2/2018
RFE response recieved: 1/3/2018

NOA2: 1/12/2018
NVC Recieved: 1/26/2018
NVC Case Number Assigned: 1/26/2018
NVC Sent To Embassy: 2/2/2018

Medical (London): 2/5/2018

Interview (London): 2/23/2018 - APPROVED

Visa On Hand: 3-2-2018 - Home Delivery

POE (Atlanta, GA): 3/13/2018 (booked)

Filed: IR-1/CR-1 Visa Country: Jamaica
Timeline
Posted

Hello, 

I am trying to understand whats the issue with IMB? I met my husband online, will it be an issue if I tell them that we did? Please explain what this thread is about, I am very confused. 

Consulate : Jamaica
Marriage (if applicable): 2016-12-24
I-130 Sent : 2017-06-13
I-130 NOA1 : 2017-06-16
I-130 RFE :  
I-130 RFE Sent :  
I-130 Approved : 2017-12-05
NVC Received : 2018-01-19
Received DS-261 / AOS Bill : 2018-01-03
Pay AOS Bill : 2018-01-03
Receive I-864 Package :  
Send AOS Package : 2018-01-12
Submit DS-261 : 2018-01-02
Receive IV Bill : 2018-01-09
Pay IV Bill : 2018-01-09
Send IV Package : 2018-01-13
Receive Instruction and Interview appointment letter : Pending
Case Completed at NVC : 2018-02-20
NVC Left : Pending
Consulate Received : Pending
Packet 3 Received : Pending
Packet 3 Sent : Pending
Packet 4 Received : Pending
Interview Date : April 27, 2018
Interview Result :
Posted
18 hours ago, TinaMah said:

Yes. However, I was reading that even if it is not you have to prove that it is not. And I am wondering how I can prove it is not if it does not even say that it is not! Wow, say that 10 times fast!

That's ridiculous. You can't prove a negative - wouldn't the burden of proof be on DHS to prove that it IS a marriage broker? Isn't that how common law works? :wacko:

Filed: K-1 Visa Country: Turkey
Timeline
Posted (edited)
9 hours ago, Curiousmind said:

Hello, 

I am trying to understand whats the issue with IMB? I met my husband online, will it be an issue if I tell them that we did? Please explain what this thread is about, I am very confused. 

If you met through a legitimate IMB, I don't really think There is an issue. You have to check the appropriate box and provide appropriate documentation etc (someone correct me if I'm wrong).

 

i was asking about Facebook because I was told by a friend to be sure to print out the terms of services so the USCIS has less weight to throw around if they want to be not so nice!

i was told that they can request that you prove to them that the social media site that we met through (Facebook) is NOT an IMB even if they know it. You could still get an RFE for it...? 

Maybe this is far-fetched, but it seems as though the case worker can ask for whatever they wish 🤷🏻‍♀️

 

And since it is literally 5 pages that I printed out, I just went ahead and attached it along with a letter saying that we met on Facebook and that Facebook is not an IMB. And I attached the Terms and the fundamental principles that states Facebook is free. Also I printed out the definition of IMB from the government docs site that gives the USCIS definition.

 

i could be a crazy over thinker.

should I not have worried?

Edited by TinaMah

NOA1 New Site: March 6th, 2018

NOA2: Sept 12th, 2018

Case # available as well as case leaving NVC both on Oct 1st, 2018

Embassy received on Oct 2nd, 2018

Medical Appointment Oct 12th, 2018

Interview at Ankara Embassy on Oct 22nd, 2018 - APPROVED!

POE San Fransisco on Dec 1st, 2018

Married Dec 10th, 2018

NOA for I-485/765/131 Feb 1st, 2019

Interview for I-485 June 19th, 2019 - APPROVED! (Interview was before we received Work Auth Card!)

Filed: IR-1/CR-1 Visa Country: Jamaica
Timeline
Posted
1 hour ago, TinaMah said:

If you met through a legitimate IMB, I don't really think There is an issue. You have to check the appropriate box and provide appropriate documentation etc (someone correct me if I'm wrong).

 

i was asking about Facebook because I was told by a friend to be sure to print out the terms of services so the USCIS has less weight to throw around if they want to be not so nice!

i was told that they can request that you prove to them that the social media site that we met through (Facebook) is NOT an IMB even if they know it. You could still get an RFE for it...? 

Maybe this is far-fetched, but it seems as though the case worker can ask for whatever they wish 🤷🏻‍♀️

 

And since it is literally 5 pages that I printed out, I just went ahead and attached it along with a letter saying that we met on Facebook and that Facebook is not an IMB. And I attached the Terms and the fundamental principles that states Facebook is free. Also I printed out the definition of IMB from the government docs site that gives the USCIS definition.

 

i could be a crazy over thinker.

should I not have worried?

At what stage was this required? 

I am at the interview stage now, I am trying to understand if this is for I130 or the NVC process. 

Consulate : Jamaica
Marriage (if applicable): 2016-12-24
I-130 Sent : 2017-06-13
I-130 NOA1 : 2017-06-16
I-130 RFE :  
I-130 RFE Sent :  
I-130 Approved : 2017-12-05
NVC Received : 2018-01-19
Received DS-261 / AOS Bill : 2018-01-03
Pay AOS Bill : 2018-01-03
Receive I-864 Package :  
Send AOS Package : 2018-01-12
Submit DS-261 : 2018-01-02
Receive IV Bill : 2018-01-09
Pay IV Bill : 2018-01-09
Send IV Package : 2018-01-13
Receive Instruction and Interview appointment letter : Pending
Case Completed at NVC : 2018-02-20
NVC Left : Pending
Consulate Received : Pending
Packet 3 Received : Pending
Packet 3 Sent : Pending
Packet 4 Received : Pending
Interview Date : April 27, 2018
Interview Result :
Filed: K-1 Visa Country: Turkey
Timeline
Posted
1 hour ago, Curiousmind said:

At what stage was this required? 

I am at the interview stage now, I am trying to understand if this is for I130 or the NVC process. 

I really don't know. I believe it was before the NOA2, but I'm really not sure. Sorry.

NOA1 New Site: March 6th, 2018

NOA2: Sept 12th, 2018

Case # available as well as case leaving NVC both on Oct 1st, 2018

Embassy received on Oct 2nd, 2018

Medical Appointment Oct 12th, 2018

Interview at Ankara Embassy on Oct 22nd, 2018 - APPROVED!

POE San Fransisco on Dec 1st, 2018

Married Dec 10th, 2018

NOA for I-485/765/131 Feb 1st, 2019

Interview for I-485 June 19th, 2019 - APPROVED! (Interview was before we received Work Auth Card!)

  • 4 weeks later...
Posted

Hi, I am new here and one of the topics I needed an answer to is the IMB topic. I met my girlfriend on filipinocupid.com a dating website. I asked them question regarding this topic in order to address this. This was their response. I hope this helps with for anyone who uses specific sites like these:

 

--------
 

"Dear member,

Thank you for contacting us.

The intention of the International Marriage Broker Regulation Act of 2005 was
to regulate International Marriage Brokers and not to regulate online dating
companies. There are several fundamental differences between international
marriage brokers and online dating websites. This is why the International
Marriage Broker Regulation Act specifically exempts online dating companies
from being classified as an International Marriage Broker in section 4 (B) (ii)
of the International Marriage Broker Regulation Act of 2005.

Section 4 (B) (ii) of IMBRA exempts dating companies:

If its principal business is not to provide dating services between US citizens
(or residents) and foreign nationals and so long as it charges comparable
rates and offers comparable services to all individuals regardless of gender or
country of citizenship. Our company meets the above conditions required for
an exemption under Section 4 (B) (ii).
Specifically:

• Our principal business is not to provide dating services between US citizens
and foreign nationals. “Principal Business” as described under Section 4 (B)
(ii) of IMBRA relates to the principal business of the corporate entity as a
whole and not to the characteristics of an individual website operated by a
business. We are not a US company and we have paying and non paying
customers from all over the world. The number of non US men vastly
outnumber the number of US men who use our various dating websites. We
are a diversified online dating company operating a wide range of online
dating services. Many of our dating sites attract large number of users seeking
a partner within their country. We operate websites based on religion,
occupation, sexual orientation or special interest where the majority of people
seek a partner within their own country. US men seeking a foreign partner
does not constitute the majority of our business.

• Our websites charge comparable prices regardless of gender. The price of
membership is identical for men and women.

• Our websites charge comparable prices regardless of country of citizenship.
The price of membership does not depend upon the citizenship of the
individual. We are an Australian company and our base price is in Australian
Dollars. For convenience we offer consumers the ability to pay in their local
currency. The price that a consumer pays will depend upon local taxes (if
any), foreign exchange fluctuations, the cost of doing business in that market
and various other factors. Prices are comparable for consumers in every
market.

• Our websites have identical features and offer comparable services
regardless of gender. The website features and services offered are
comparable for men and women. When a user registers on one of our
websites the user creates a detailed profile. Male and female profiles are
comparable. Male and female users have the ability to perform a detailed
search on the database or use any of the same site features. The websites
provide comparable features to any user of a particular grade irrespective of
the users gender.

Consequently, our company is exempt from The International Marriage Broker
Regulation Act 2005 as it falls within this exemption provided by Section 4 (B)
(ii) of the International Marriage Broker Regulation Act. Most other online
dating companies would be similarly exempted.

However, as a service to our members, we provide an optional IMBRA form on
all our websites for US residents to complete the required IMBRA background
information.  To complete the IMBRA form, logon to the website then select
Update Profile, then select the IMBRA tab. The completed form may be
printed from our website if desired. This may assist our members who wish to
apply for USA K non-immigrant visa in future."
[Unqoute]
  • 4 weeks later...
Filed: AOS (apr) Country: Philippines
Timeline
Posted
On ‎2‎/‎26‎/‎2018 at 7:10 PM, Curiousmind said:

At what stage was this required? 

I am at the interview stage now, I am trying to understand if this is for I130 or the NVC process. 

I-129F for K-1 ONLY

YMMV

  • 1 month later...
Filed: AOS (apr) Country: Canada
Timeline
Posted

Paul and I met on Facebook. I simply attached the TOS.

 

I reckon it will be enough. if not, im sure they will let me know lol

i 485, 130, EAD and AP

04/09/2019    NOA1 received/check cashed i 485 and 130 (direct adjustment)

11/7/2019      Interview- Norfolk

11/10/2019    APPROVED (notification rec'd 11/10, approval dated 11/8)

DONE FOR TWO YEARS!!! ;)

 

Filed everything ourselves with no RFE's or delays.

 

CR1 for Child under 21 (20 at time of filing)- Filed by LPR Spouse for his son

4/4/20     Mailed packet

4/12/20   NOA1 rec'd

10/14/21 (havent heard anything... when do i start to get worried?)

9/15/22 APPROVED! Now to wait for NVC and interview....

 

ROC

10/14/21 Mailed to AZ PO Box. Let the waiting begin. Again.

10/16/21 Received at PO Box

10/19/21 Received Text NOA1

10/23/21 Received Mailed NOA1

 

 
Didn't find the answer you were looking for? Ask our VJ Immigration Lawyers.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
- Back to Top -

Important Disclaimer: Please read carefully the Visajourney.com Terms of Service. If you do not agree to the Terms of Service you should not access or view any page (including this page) on VisaJourney.com. Answers and comments provided on Visajourney.com Forums are general information, and are not intended to substitute for informed professional medical, psychiatric, psychological, tax, legal, investment, accounting, or other professional advice. Visajourney.com does not endorse, and expressly disclaims liability for any product, manufacturer, distributor, service or service provider mentioned or any opinion expressed in answers or comments. VisaJourney.com does not condone immigration fraud in any way, shape or manner. VisaJourney.com recommends that if any member or user knows directly of someone involved in fraudulent or illegal activity, that they report such activity directly to the Department of Homeland Security, Immigration and Customs Enforcement. You can contact ICE via email at Immigration.Reply@dhs.gov or you can telephone ICE at 1-866-347-2423. All reported threads/posts containing reference to immigration fraud or illegal activities will be removed from this board. If you feel that you have found inappropriate content, please let us know by contacting us here with a url link to that content. Thank you.
×
×
  • Create New...