Jump to content

90 posts in this topic

Recommended Posts

Posted

I don't think eliminating the parent category will break up families. I think that was just an emotional response.

“When starting an immigration journey, the best advice is to understand that sacrifices have to be made... whether it is time, money, or separation; or a combination of all.” - Unlockable

Posted
32 minutes ago, sparkles_ said:

Those are fightin' words, you should know this, LOL!!!

Oh I know this because I am from Greensboro and now living in Sanford. This is one of many reasons why I divorced my 1st wife, she is a Carolina fan.

Filed: IR-1/CR-1 Visa Country: Sweden
Timeline
Posted
5 hours ago, mustang85635 said:

What I can never understand is this obsession with some immigrants here feeling like its there god given constitutional right as a new citizen to start bringing over there parents . Those parents contribute nothing to the USA , maybe good for free child sitting . But dont tell me you will have a sick parent on your health insurance, with premiums and stuff as it is . You have to be very rich to afford it in the long run . The minute they become elgible for Medicare they will be enrolled by all the warm and fuzzy do gooders talking rich here on the forum . 

Sending over USD will go a long way in a third world country . I can understand the person wanting to get them over but you are biased because you are an immigrant . How does the majority of americans feel about bringing over siblings and parents ? I have yet to find someone that thinks its a smart thing to do especially when the smart educated people from STEM fields ( that graduated here too )are in the H1B Loop forever until they leave for Canada or Australia where it takes them little over half a year from overseas to get PR and are welcomed with open arms. 

 

Family friend from eastern europe graduated with an undergraduate degree and graduate degree from UNC Chapel Hill ( ivy league ) and after that a PHD from same instituiton . He has been here for like 13-14 years and is now as a Ast .Professor for Political Science still in the waiting game for a GREEN CARD ! He is educating the future of our country and has so many times almost given up and packed up for another place with merit based system . His research is top notch and he is paying a ton of taxes every year . 

 

And then you have parents that can come here in 6 months with no problem and no benefit what so ever to this country . 

No other country like the USA has this parent migration.

 

End this thing of the past already good god.

If you want to take care of your parents you got a wonderful thing called western union . 

What world do you live in?!?!?! A lot of parent immigration comes from western countries where the immigrating parents will bring their overseas retirement money and spend it in the US. That’s great for the American economy?!?! 

 

There are easy steps to take to protect Medicare. For example, one needs x amount of work credit or x amount of years as a permanent resident before they’re eligible for Medicare. Problem solved.

 

Met online October 2010


Engaged December 31st 2011


heart.gifMarried May 14th 2013 heart.gif



USCIS Stage


September 8th 2014 - Filed I-130 with Nebraska Service Center


September 16th 2014 - NOA1 received


March 2nd 2015 - NOA2 received :dancing:



NVC Stage


March 28th 2015 - Choice of agent complete & AOS fee paid


April 17th 2015 - IV fee paid


May 1st 2015 - Sent in IV application


May 12th 2015 - Sent in AOS and IV documents


May 18th 2015 - Scan Date


June 18th 2015 - Checklist received


June 22nd 2015 - Checklist response sent to NVC


June 25th 2015 - Put for Supervisor Review


Sept 15th 2015 - Request help from Texas US Senator Cornyn and his team


Sept 23rd 2015 - Our case is moved from supervisor review to NVC's team for dealing with Senator requests


Nov 4th 2015 - CASE COMPLETE!!!! :dancing:



Embassy Stage


Dec 16th 2015 - Medical exam


Dec 21st 2015 - Interview


Dec 21st 2015 - 221(g) issued at interview for updated forms


Jan 13th 2016 - Mailed our reply to the 221(g) to the US Embassy, received and CEAC updated the next morning


Jan 20th 2016 - Embassy require more in-depth info on asset for i-864


Feb 1st 2016 - Sent more in-depth info on assets as requested. Received the next morning


Feb 16th 2016 - Visa has been issued :dancing: :dancing: :dancing: :dancing: :dancing:



In the US


April 5th 2016 - POE Newark. No questions asked.


April 14th 2016 - SSN received


May 10th 2016 - First day at my new job :dancing:


May 27th 2016 - Green Card received


June 7th 2016 - Got my Texas driver's license

Filed: AOS (pnd) Country: Germany
Timeline
Posted (edited)
13 minutes ago, Dee elle said:

Yeah at last thx !!!! Medicare is protected now... unless you have 40 quarters of ss earnings, you never get the free parts of Medicare... you can buy in, just like buyng any other insurance... even when you naturalize, if you havent got 40 quarters you have to buy in... 

 

And yes.. this is our situation exactly....  we  brought all our retirement savings and the US economy gets to benefit when we spend it... it is  a huge oversimplification to state that all parent immigration is a huge drain on the taxpayer... it's just not that simple. 

Wrong, there are always hardship rules that are the ones being abused. If you are here and naturalize especially and you have doctors write you up letters that you are really sick and show that you have no money or low income and you take those in you will receive Medicare and other benefits. And you always receive Medicare once you hit retirement age , which is the age bracket we are most likely talking about.

Edited by mustang85635
Filed: AOS (pnd) Country: Germany
Timeline
Posted (edited)
7 minutes ago, Dee elle said:

A naturalised USC who is over 65 but who has not earned 40 quarters, or whose spouse has not earned 40 quarters does not receive Medicare... they can buy in but no free part. Where the parents are both immigrating this is the situation   

If you have lived in the USA for five years then you become eligible for Medicare. Yes if you have never worked or paid into the system you have to pay a premium buy into PART A and PART B  but for what you get in Medicare its very little compared to the overall costs especially as an old person .


Also like I said the states especially democratic ones handle it way differently they look at income and usually you dont even have to wait 5 years even as an immigrant because they pay through it with state funding.

 

Please dont come to this thread with limited knowledge and start throwing around facts that are only half the truth . 

Medicaid for immigrants

A 1996 welfare reform law stipulates that immigrants must have five years of legal U.S. residency to become eligible for federal benefits such as Medicaid. The good news is that some states decided to not adhere strictly to that rule, and they provide coverage through state dollars for those who meet specified income standards.

According to HHS data (see figure 4), as of 2011, 15 states allowed the use of state funds to provide Medicaid benefits for qualified immigrants who would otherwise be ineligible because of their immigration status – including the fact that they had resided in the United States for less than five years (note that New Jersey is included in HHS’ list of states that provide state-funded Medicaid coverage to recent immigrants, but New Jersey has changed that rule and no longer does so). So if your grandmother has a limited income, don’t rule out Medicaid as an option until you check with your state Medicaid office.

 

https://www.medicareresources.org/faqs/can-recent-immigrants-to-the-united-states-get-health-coverage-if-theyre-over-65/

Edited by mustang85635
Filed: AOS (pnd) Country: Germany
Timeline
Posted
4 minutes ago, Dee elle said:

The discussion has been around Medicare not Medicaid. Your assumption that I don’t know what I am talking about is very incorrect.   

Its the same with Medicare ,same guidelines, posted wrong paragraph . If you cant pay for it in most blue states and some red the state will pay for it. Especially in places like Minnesota and the likes .

https://mn.gov/dhs/people-we-serve/adults/health-care/health-care-programs/programs-and-services/noncitizens.jsp

Trust me this discussion hasn't been going on for years if it was all for a big misunderstanding . You are not breaking some myth here its happening.

Posted
2 hours ago, falmaind said:

Do you want to stop and rethink your positions again... Your feet are on both sides in my opinion... The same person you are propping (and should be as he deserves it), you are also potentially smothering him.... once he becomes a citizen, you want him to Not be able to get his aging parents close to him (I am assuming a lot of things regarding his family situation to make a point).

 

You may not know me directly. But yes My spouse and I have paid close to half a million in taxes and my parents when here would be here on my dime. And you are rolling us in with the rest of the lot. Parents are a must. I wouldn't mind if such naturalizations are neutered, so to speak. Maybe  not make them eligible for further sponsoring. I'd be fine with that. People like you only want to take advantage of the brilliant minds. But not pay it back for their familial cohesiveness. We need to stop being so selfish.

 

I'm all for limiting sibling migration without merit. I would propose amendment to the sibling visa program, where education and language skills count towards earning points (in addition to other skills). Anyone not meeting those standards gets their application dropped. We'll see a quick improvement in the backlog.

I know people on this forum tend to hate on undocumented immigrants, but I still don't get why it's perhaps acceptable to benefit from someone's brilliant (and highly educated) minds, but it's ok to take advantage of strong backs and financial need of people who cross from poorer countries?  Large parts of our economy are based on having undocumented workers desperate to earn money, but it's considered ok to use 'em up and deport them. 

Sorry, I know this thought is outside what was mostly being discussed so far, but the discussion of what it means to be a community and not just a business made me think of it.

Filed: AOS (pnd) Country: Germany
Timeline
Posted
16 minutes ago, Dee elle said:

 The discussion has been around Medicare not Medicaid. Your assumption that I don’t know what I am talking about is very incorrect.   

Basically you were referencing the official federal government guidelines but in practice from state to state it varies heavily and most have some form of Medicare for old and young immigrants newly arrived or not. 

 

Posted
3 minutes ago, dawning said:

I know people on this forum tend to hate on undocumented immigrants, but I still don't get why it's perhaps acceptable to benefit from someone's brilliant (and highly educated) minds, but it's ok to take advantage of strong backs and financial need of people who cross from poorer countries?  Large parts of our economy are based on having undocumented workers desperate to earn money, but it's considered ok to use 'em up and deport them. 

The reason for the hate is the mode of their arrival. Were they not here, would our economy collapse? No. They are making themselves available and undercutting those who are here legally. They are throwing themselves at the US of A. What if I came to your house and painted it without your permission or without you asking of me... and then I expected a fair compensation... would you pay me? (maybe once). Would you pay me everyday? no you would get sick of me

 

3 minutes ago, dawning said:

Sorry, I know this thought is outside what was mostly being discussed so far, but the discussion of what it means to be a community and not just a business made me think of it.

 

Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Ecuador
Timeline
Posted

Two posts have been removed because they were assaultive, contained insults, or both.

The member in question risks administrative action upon a repeat.

The discussion in this thread has largely been a very pleasant exchange of differing views.  Let's keep it that way.

 

VJ Moderation

06-04-2007 = TSC stamps postal return-receipt for I-129f.

06-11-2007 = NOA1 date (unknown to me).

07-20-2007 = Phoned Immigration Officer; got WAC#; where's NOA1?

09-25-2007 = Touch (first-ever).

09-28-2007 = NOA1, 23 days after their 45-day promise to send it (grrrr).

10-20 & 11-14-2007 = Phoned ImmOffs; "still pending."

12-11-2007 = 180 days; file is "between workstations, may be early Jan."; touches 12/11 & 12/12.

12-18-2007 = Call; file is with Division 9 ofcr. (bckgrnd check); e-prompt to shake it; touch.

12-19-2007 = NOA2 by e-mail & web, dated 12-18-07 (187 days; 201 per VJ); in mail 12/24/07.

01-09-2008 = File from USCIS to NVC, 1-4-08; NVC creates file, 1/15/08; to consulate 1/16/08.

01-23-2008 = Consulate gets file; outdated Packet 4 mailed to fiancee 1/27/08; rec'd 3/3/08.

04-29-2008 = Fiancee's 4-min. consular interview, 8:30 a.m.; much evidence brought but not allowed to be presented (consul: "More proof! Second interview! Bring your fiance!").

05-05-2008 = Infuriating $12 call to non-English-speaking consulate appointment-setter.

05-06-2008 = Better $12 call to English-speaker; "joint" interview date 6/30/08 (my selection).

06-30-2008 = Stokes Interrogations w/Ecuadorian (not USC); "wait 2 weeks; we'll mail her."

07-2008 = Daily calls to DOS: "currently processing"; 8/05 = Phoned consulate, got Section Chief; wrote him.

08-07-08 = E-mail from consulate, promising to issue visa "as soon as we get her passport" (on 8/12, per DHL).

08-27-08 = Phoned consulate (they "couldn't find" our file); visa DHL'd 8/28; in hand 9/1; through POE on 10/9 with NO hassles(!).

Posted
42 minutes ago, TBoneTX said:

Two posts have been removed because they were assaultive, contained insults, or both.

The member in question risks administrative action upon a repeat.

The discussion in this thread has largely been a very pleasant exchange of differing views.  Let's keep it that way.

 

VJ Moderation

Agree.

Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Vietnam
Timeline
Posted

The reality is the tax payer ends up covering the costs.

ROC Timeline

Service Center: Vermont

90 Day Window Opened....08/08/17

I-751 Packet Sent..............08/14/17

NO1 Dated.........................

NO1 Received....................

Check Cashed....................

Biometrics Received..........

Biometrics Appointment.....

Approved...........................

 

IR-1/CR-1 Visa

I-130 NOA1: 22 Dec 2014
I-130 NOA2: 25 Jan 2015
NVC Received: 06 Feb 2015
Pay AOS Bill: 07 Mar 2015
Pay IV Bill : 20 Mar 2015
Send IV/AOS Package: 23 Mar 2015
Submit DS-261: 26 Mar 2015
Case Completed at NVC: 24 Apr 2015
Interview Date: 22 Sep 2015
Visa Approved: 22 Sep 2015
Visa Received: 03 Oct 2015 

 
Didn't find the answer you were looking for? Ask our VJ Immigration Lawyers.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
- Back to Top -

Important Disclaimer: Please read carefully the Visajourney.com Terms of Service. If you do not agree to the Terms of Service you should not access or view any page (including this page) on VisaJourney.com. Answers and comments provided on Visajourney.com Forums are general information, and are not intended to substitute for informed professional medical, psychiatric, psychological, tax, legal, investment, accounting, or other professional advice. Visajourney.com does not endorse, and expressly disclaims liability for any product, manufacturer, distributor, service or service provider mentioned or any opinion expressed in answers or comments. VisaJourney.com does not condone immigration fraud in any way, shape or manner. VisaJourney.com recommends that if any member or user knows directly of someone involved in fraudulent or illegal activity, that they report such activity directly to the Department of Homeland Security, Immigration and Customs Enforcement. You can contact ICE via email at Immigration.Reply@dhs.gov or you can telephone ICE at 1-866-347-2423. All reported threads/posts containing reference to immigration fraud or illegal activities will be removed from this board. If you feel that you have found inappropriate content, please let us know by contacting us here with a url link to that content. Thank you.
×
×
  • Create New...