The Daily Trump wins again thread

[luckytxn 2,264]

1 minute ago, Steeleballz said:

  

  The fact is that companies exist in countries, so yes, if countries regulate or restrict exports, then we may not be able to get drugs from those countries. I'm not saying the country is the supplier.  I understand exactly what you are saying, but it is not the scenario that exists currently. Our prices may not be regulated, but the manufacturing process is. When I name the countries, I am talking about countries that currently have large pharmaceutical manufacturing industry and would allow enough exportation to occur. The reason I named India is because the infrastructure currently exists. I imagine several other countries too. Ultimately it would come down to both other countries allowing exportation to occur, and also US regulatory agencies allowing companies from those countries to sell here.

 

   

 

 

Then we are on the same sheet of music here. It is the countries inhibiting the free flow of commerce because of their governments actions. You also assume that a company has to have a huge infrastructure to allow any kind of exportation. It helps yes but a small operation can make a lot of drugs if allowed to. I am not kidding when I say that drugs making is actually an somewhat easy process. I know as I used to do it in a small warehouse make a lot of legal drugs. (Again vitamins and analgesics and etc.) It is the wide variety of differing drugs that would take a huge infrastructure but a smattering of drugs needed at given times could easily be done if allowed to. 

[Burnt Reynolds 5,058]

2 minutes ago, luckytxn said:

Then we are on the same sheet of music here. It is the countries inhibiting the free flow of commerce because of their governments actions. You also assume that a company has to have a huge infrastructure to allow any kind of exportation. It helps yes but a small operation can make a lot of drugs if allowed to. I am not kidding when I say that drugs making is actually an somewhat easy process. I know as I used to do it in a small warehouse make a lot of legal drugs. (Again vitamins and analgesics and etc.) It is the wide variety of differing drugs that would take a huge infrastructure but a smattering of drugs needed at given times could easily be done if allowed to. 

Doesn't seem like a free flow when there are so many government rules that contribute to restrictions of supply and artificial scarcity, which results in hiked prices.

Edited November 23, 2019 by Burnt Reynolds

[luckytxn 2,264]

1 minute ago, Burnt Reynolds said:

Doesn't seem like a free flow when there are so many government rules that contribute to restrictions of supply and artificial scarcity, which results in hiked prices.

Duh! Thanks for repeating what I stated anyway.

[Steeleballz 7,550]

3 minutes ago, luckytxn said:

Then we are on the same sheet of music here. It is the countries inhibiting the free flow of commerce because of their governments actions. You also assume that a company has to have a huge infrastructure to allow any kind of exportation. It helps yes but a small operation can make a lot of drugs if allowed to. I am not kidding when I say that drugs making is actually an somewhat easy process. I know as I used to do it in a small warehouse make a lot of legal drugs. (Again vitamins and analgesics and etc.) It is the wide variety of differing drugs that would take a huge infrastructure but a smattering of drugs needed at given times could easily be done if allowed to. 

 

  Actually, I'm not assuming that. It was why I gave a specific example of a country that does allow it. It's also why I know Canada will not let it happen. 

[luckytxn 2,264]

11 minutes ago, Steeleballz said:

 

  Actually, I'm not assuming that. It was why I gave a specific example of a country that does allow it. It's also why I know Canada will not let it happen. 

Yeah well the Libertarian in me says that Canada wants to control its citizenry is the reason but we know that the kickbacks that the pharmaceuticals hands out to the politicians and the family they employ and pay handsomely probably is more the reason. 

Edited November 23, 2019 by luckytxn

[Voice of Reason 10,298]

https://mobile.twitter.com/EWErickson/status/1197491328206213121 

[Nature Boy 2.0 8,370]

S&P 500 and Nasdaq hit record highs as 2019 rally picks up steam again, Dow gains 120 points

 

https://www.cnbc.com/2019/11/25/stock-market-wall-street-in-focus-amid-earnings-and-economic-data.html

[luckytxn 2,264]

15 minutes ago, Nature Boy 2.0 said:

S&P 500 and Nasdaq hit record highs as 2019 rally picks up steam again, Dow gains 120 points

 

https://www.cnbc.com/2019/11/25/stock-market-wall-street-in-focus-amid-earnings-and-economic-data.html

Thanks Obama!

[Dashinka 24,499]

GOVT

Black voter support of Trump quadrupled since election
 

https://onenewsnow.com/politics-govt/2019/11/26/black-voter-support-of-trump-quadrupled-since-election

[Voice of Reason 10,298]

7 minutes ago, Bill & Katya said:

GOVT

Black voter support of Trump quadrupled since election
 

https://onenewsnow.com/politics-govt/2019/11/26/black-voter-support-of-trump-quadrupled-since-election

Not surprising at all.  What I do find strange is that they have stuck with the party that has kept them enslaved for so long.  Glad the #woke are seeing the light. 

[Nature Boy 2.0 8,370]

S&P 500 rises for a fourth straight day, hits fresh record high

https://www.cnbc.com/2019/11/27/stock-market-wall-street-in-focus-amid-earnings-beige-book-and-data.html

[Nature Boy 2.0 8,370]

https://www.cnbc.com/2019/11/27/stock-market-wall-street-in-focus-amid-earnings-beige-book-and-data.html

 

Stocks rise for a fourth day in a row, hit record highs

Apple employees support Tim Cook’s lobbying efforts with Trump, surprising survey shows

https://www.foxnews.com/tech/apple-employees-support-tim-cook-lobbying-donald-trump

[Steeleballz 7,550]

On 11/26/2019 at 4:31 AM, ALFKAD said:

Not surprising at all.  What I do find strange is that they have stuck with the party that has kept them enslaved for so long.  Glad the #woke are seeing the light. 

 

  This poll is not at all surprising, since Rasmussen had black voter support for Trump polling at 40% prior to the 2018 midterms. The 40% figure did not correlate well with exit polls, which showed 8% of black voters cast their ballots for Republican candidates. The interesting thing is Rasmussen explains their discrepancy as being due to polling likely voters as opposed to other firms who just poll random adults. The election results did not bear that out. Seemed to be the exact opposite FWIW.

[Boiler 45,517]

2 minutes ago, Steeleballz said:

 

  This poll is not at all surprising, since Rasmussen had black voter support for Trump polling at 40% prior to the 2018 midterms. The 40% figure did not correlate well with exit polls, which showed 8% of black voters cast their ballots for Republican candidates. The interesting thing is Rasmussen explains their discrepancy as being due to polling likely voters as opposed to other firms who just poll random adults. The election results did not bear that out. Seemed to be the exact opposite FWIW.

Odd that so many vote for the party of the KKK.

[Steeleballz 7,550]

15 minutes ago, Boiler said:

Odd that so many vote for the party of the KKK.

 

  Probably due to the fact that the modern version of the KKK generally endorses the Republican party. I know your not American, Boiler, but you must have studied some civics. There is no reason you should not know that the Democratic and Republican platforms did switch between the end of the civil war and the start of the 20th century. You should save the KKK line for people who don't know any better. That group unfortunately includes many Americans who are ignorant of their own history. 

Edited November 28, 2019 by Steeleballz