Jump to content
smilesammich

Alleged White Supremacist Is Charged With Terrorism After Stopping Amtrak Train

 Share

97 posts in this topic

Recommended Posts

Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Ecuador
Timeline

A post containing an image with non-family-friendly language in it has been removed.

The image has also been edited out of a quoting post.

06-04-2007 = TSC stamps postal return-receipt for I-129f.

06-11-2007 = NOA1 date (unknown to me).

07-20-2007 = Phoned Immigration Officer; got WAC#; where's NOA1?

09-25-2007 = Touch (first-ever).

09-28-2007 = NOA1, 23 days after their 45-day promise to send it (grrrr).

10-20 & 11-14-2007 = Phoned ImmOffs; "still pending."

12-11-2007 = 180 days; file is "between workstations, may be early Jan."; touches 12/11 & 12/12.

12-18-2007 = Call; file is with Division 9 ofcr. (bckgrnd check); e-prompt to shake it; touch.

12-19-2007 = NOA2 by e-mail & web, dated 12-18-07 (187 days; 201 per VJ); in mail 12/24/07.

01-09-2008 = File from USCIS to NVC, 1-4-08; NVC creates file, 1/15/08; to consulate 1/16/08.

01-23-2008 = Consulate gets file; outdated Packet 4 mailed to fiancee 1/27/08; rec'd 3/3/08.

04-29-2008 = Fiancee's 4-min. consular interview, 8:30 a.m.; much evidence brought but not allowed to be presented (consul: "More proof! Second interview! Bring your fiance!").

05-05-2008 = Infuriating $12 call to non-English-speaking consulate appointment-setter.

05-06-2008 = Better $12 call to English-speaker; "joint" interview date 6/30/08 (my selection).

06-30-2008 = Stokes Interrogations w/Ecuadorian (not USC); "wait 2 weeks; we'll mail her."

07-2008 = Daily calls to DOS: "currently processing"; 8/05 = Phoned consulate, got Section Chief; wrote him.

08-07-08 = E-mail from consulate, promising to issue visa "as soon as we get her passport" (on 8/12, per DHL).

08-27-08 = Phoned consulate (they "couldn't find" our file); visa DHL'd 8/28; in hand 9/1; through POE on 10/9 with NO hassles(!).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, smilesammich said:

oh do tell..what part of the story is missing?

I know you missed it the first time so I'll simplify it so you can understand. The article argues that 71% of police shootings were done by whites. Whites are more than 71% of the overall population. Therefore shootings by non whites are disproportionately more than shootings by whites when looking at their percentage of the population. Was that simple enough for you to understand or do I need to simplify it more?

morfunphil1_zpsoja67jml.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, jg121783 said:

I know you missed it the first time so I'll simplify it so you can understand. The article argues that 71% of police shootings were done by whites. Whites are more than 71% of the overall population. Therefore shootings by non whites are disproportionately more than shootings by whites when looking at their percentage of the population. Was that simple enough for you to understand or do I need to simplify it more?

so..the missing information is your loose interpretation of the word "disproportionately'? the denial of conservatives to recognize the issue of white cop killers is covered. the denial of conservatives to recognize domestic terrorism as a white problem (not #blm) and still no one has given me a shred of evidence that obama supported cop killers.

terrible simplification job, D-/minimal points for effort.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, smilesammich said:

prove it. or are you equating the 'black' from black lives matter with cop killers? not a good look.

You cant deny the BLM matter had a certain element that advocating killing cops. However I am sure there are some good people in that group. Wait, that sounds oddly familiar 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, smilesammich said:

evil whitey virtue signalling? that's your argument to support the assertion that obama supported cop killers? that knot deserves a merit badge :lol:

The only thing that prevented Michael Brown from being a cop killer was weapon control and bullet placement by a well trained officer.

Obama supported him.. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Nature Boy Flair said:

You cant deny the BLM matter had a certain element that advocating killing cops. However I am sure there are some good people in that group. Wait, that sounds oddly familiar 

i can deny that blm advocates killing cops, they don't. blm does not encourage violence against cops. now the kkk..nazis openly advocate violence against non whites. it's their whole 'thing'.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Nature Boy Flair said:

The only thing that prevented Michael Brown from being a cop killer was weapon control and bullet placement by a well trained officer.

Obama supported him.. 

 

the thing that prevents michael brown from being a cop killer is that he never killed a cop. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, smilesammich said:

the thing that prevents michael brown from being a cop killer is that he never killed a cop. 

and the thing that prevented him from being a cop killer was the ability of the well trained professional  cop to retain possession of his weapon and smoke his worthless behind like a rack of ribs on the 4th of july

 

Here is the fact. Michael Brown after committing a crime, tried to kill a cop. FACT Obama sent a entourage  to his funeral for support. fact 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Nature Boy Flair said:

and the thing that prevented him from being a cop killer was the ability of the well trained professional  cop to retain possession of his weapon and smoke his worthless behind like a rack of ribs on the 4th of july

 

Here is the fact. Michael Brown after committing a crime, tried to kill a cop. FACT Obama sent a entourage  to his funeral for support. fact 

 

michael brown tried to kill a cop? where's the fact in this statement? there's no fact in the statement. it was alleged that michael brown reached for a cop's gun. that's as far as you get. seriously don't know how a white supremacist attempting to commit an act of terror turns into a conversation on how obama supports cop killers. says a lot though, very sad.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: K-1 Visa Country: Wales
Timeline
4 minutes ago, Nature Boy Flair said:

and the thing that prevented him from being a cop killer was the ability of the well trained professional  cop to retain possession of his weapon and smoke his worthless behind like a rack of ribs on the 4th of july

 

Here is the fact. Michael Brown after committing a crime, tried to kill a cop. FACT Obama sent a entourage  to his funeral for support. fact 

 

Facts are often inconvenient.

“If you know the enemy and know yourself, you need not fear the result of a hundred battles. If you know yourself but not the enemy, for every victory gained you will also suffer a defeat. If you know neither the enemy nor yourself, you will succumb in every battle.”

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Russia
Timeline
1 hour ago, smilesammich said:

yes, here's the context for you again..

"in order for me to give "Obama a pass on championing Cop Killers" (nb said this) "first i'd have to agree that obama championed cop killers, he didn't."

Commas do have use when trying to portray context.  Without the comma, the context is quite different.

Visa Received : 2014-04-04 (K1 - see timeline for details)

US Entry : 2014-09-12

POE: Detroit

Marriage : 2014-09-27

I-765 Approved: 2015-01-09

I-485 Interview: 2015-03-11

I-485 Approved: 2015-03-13

Green Card Received: 2015-03-24 Yeah!!!

I-751 ROC Submitted: 2016-12-20

I-751 NOA Received:  2016-12-29

I-751 Biometrics Appt.:  2017-01-26

I-751 Interview:  2018-04-10

I-751 Approved:  2018-05-04

N400 Filed:  2018-01-13

N400 Biometrics:  2018-02-22

N400 Interview:  2018-04-10

N400 Approved:  2018-04-10

Oath Ceremony:  2018-06-11 - DONE!!!!!!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Bill & Katya said:

Commas do have use when trying to portray context.  Without the comma, the context is quite different.

guess that's why i used one.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Russia
Timeline
Just now, smilesammich said:

guess that's why i used one.

You didn’t use enough of them.  There should have been a comma after the word “first”to convey the proper context you are now claiming.

Visa Received : 2014-04-04 (K1 - see timeline for details)

US Entry : 2014-09-12

POE: Detroit

Marriage : 2014-09-27

I-765 Approved: 2015-01-09

I-485 Interview: 2015-03-11

I-485 Approved: 2015-03-13

Green Card Received: 2015-03-24 Yeah!!!

I-751 ROC Submitted: 2016-12-20

I-751 NOA Received:  2016-12-29

I-751 Biometrics Appt.:  2017-01-26

I-751 Interview:  2018-04-10

I-751 Approved:  2018-05-04

N400 Filed:  2018-01-13

N400 Biometrics:  2018-02-22

N400 Interview:  2018-04-10

N400 Approved:  2018-04-10

Oath Ceremony:  2018-06-11 - DONE!!!!!!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Bill & Katya said:

You didn’t use enough of them.  There should have been a comma after the word “first”to convey the proper context you are now claiming.

:lol: 

 

and also..

 

:bonk:

 

next time you want to try and convince me of what i meant with my own post, maybe don't tell me to overuse commas. silly. might as well said you didn't understand because i didn't capitalize anything. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: K-1 Visa Country: Wales
Timeline

Original format makes sense to most of us.

“If you know the enemy and know yourself, you need not fear the result of a hundred battles. If you know yourself but not the enemy, for every victory gained you will also suffer a defeat. If you know neither the enemy nor yourself, you will succumb in every battle.”

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
- Back to Top -

Important Disclaimer: Please read carefully the Visajourney.com Terms of Service. If you do not agree to the Terms of Service you should not access or view any page (including this page) on VisaJourney.com. Answers and comments provided on Visajourney.com Forums are general information, and are not intended to substitute for informed professional medical, psychiatric, psychological, tax, legal, investment, accounting, or other professional advice. Visajourney.com does not endorse, and expressly disclaims liability for any product, manufacturer, distributor, service or service provider mentioned or any opinion expressed in answers or comments. VisaJourney.com does not condone immigration fraud in any way, shape or manner. VisaJourney.com recommends that if any member or user knows directly of someone involved in fraudulent or illegal activity, that they report such activity directly to the Department of Homeland Security, Immigration and Customs Enforcement. You can contact ICE via email at Immigration.Reply@dhs.gov or you can telephone ICE at 1-866-347-2423. All reported threads/posts containing reference to immigration fraud or illegal activities will be removed from this board. If you feel that you have found inappropriate content, please let us know by contacting us here with a url link to that content. Thank you.
×
×
  • Create New...