Jump to content

34 posts in this topic

Recommended Posts

Filed: Timeline
Posted
12 hours ago, AlexSouthAmerica said:

Hopefully whoever we deal with in regards to getting a new visa will have common sense and just let her get another visa. She has been here 4 previous times and only overstayed to be with me this time. She has no intent of immigrating here and I have no intent of staying if we do indeed leave. We still have a few more people to meet with before making a decision, but it seems it's a matter of circumstances and who we end up dealing with when the time comes to apply for a new visa.

 

Thanks for the input everyone, I really appreciate it! If anyone has any similar experiences, stories, or other information, please add to the discussion. I will definitely be checking back here often.

It's not a matter of common sense -- its a matter of law.  Law and common sense frequently are unrelated. 

 

Law requires the officer to start with the assumption that your wife is an intending immigrant until she can convince them otherwise.  Although she used her previous visa in accordance with the law three times, the last (most recent) time she used it she overstayed.  That's something the officer will need to take a careful look at and be convinced won't happen again.  Pretty high bar to start from.

Posted
19 hours ago, Boiler said:

There is a waiver for the ban.

 

There's a waiver for the ban if they're trying to come back on a spouse visa or something but a tourist visa? I was long under the impression that once you've overstayed or otherwise abused a tourist visa, you were unlikely to be given another.... no?

 

 

OP: I really think that the lawyers may have been not talking about the bans themselves (maybe I'm not sure) but the general liklihood of getting a tourist visa after misusing the first one. The bans are bans from *any* visa, or entry in general (and are able to be waived for spouses/family for hardship reasons) but she'd not be guaranteed to get another tourist visa, ban or no ban and maybe that's what the lawyers were saying? That's always been my understanding of the situation. So she wouldn't be banned from the US generally (after the 3 years are up)-- she could still come back on a spouse visa, but they probably won't be in a rush to approve a tourist visa. 

Marriage/ AOS Timeline:

23 Dec 2015: Legal marriage

23 Jan 2016: Wedding!

23 Jan 2016: "Blizzard of the Century", wedding canceled/rescheduled (thank goodness we were legally married first or we'd have had a big problem!) :sleepy:

24 Jan 2016: Small "civil ceremony" with friends and family who were snowed in with us. December was a bit of a secret and people had traveled internationally and knew we *had* to get married that weekend, and our December legal marriage was nothing but signing a piece of paper at our priest's kitchen table, without any sort of vows etc so this was actually a very special (if not legally significant) day. (L)

16 Apr 2016: Filed for AOS and EAD/AP (We delayed a bit-- no big rush, enjoying the USCIS break)

23 Apr 2016: Wedding! Finally! :luv:

27 Apr 2016: Electronic NOA1 for all 3 :dancing:
29 Apr 2016: NOA1 Hardcopy for all 3
29 Jul 2016: Online service request for late EAD (Day 104)
29 Jul 2016: EAD/AP Approved ~3 hours after online service request
04 Aug 2016: RFE for Green Card (requested medicals/ vaccination record. They already have it). :ranting:
05 Aug 2016: EAD/AP Combo Card arrived! (Day 111)
08 Aug 2016: Congressional constituent request to get guidance on the RFE. Hoping they see they have the form and approve!

K-1 Visa Timeline:

PLEASE NOTE. This timeline was during the period of time when TSC was working on I-129fs and had a huge backlog. The average processing time was 210+ days. This is in no way predictive of your own timeline if you filed during or after April 2015, unless CSC develops a backlog. A backlog is anything above the 5-month goal time listed on USCIS's site

14 Feb 2015: Mailed I-129f to Dallas Lockbox. (L) (Most expensive Valentine's card I've ever sent!)

17 Feb 2015: NOA1 "Received Date"
19 Feb 2015: NOA1 Notice Date
08 Aug 2015: NOA2 email! :luv: (173 days from NOA1)

17 Aug 2015: Sent to NVC

?? Aug 2015: Arrived at NVC

25 Aug 2015: NVC Case # Assigned

31 Aug 2015: Left NVC for Consulate in San Jose

09 Sep 2015: Consulate received :dancing: (32 days from NOA2)

11 Sep 2015: Packet 3 emailed from embassy to me, the petitioner (34 days from NOA2).

18 Sep 2015: Medicals complete

21 Sep 2015: Packet 3 complete, my boss puts a temporary moratorium on all time off due to work emergency :clock:

02 Oct 2015: Work emergency clears up, interview scheduled (soonest available was 5 business days away--Columbus Day was in there)

13 Oct 2015: Interview

13 Oct 2015: VISA APPROVED :thumbs: (236 days from NOA1)

19 Oct 2015: Visa-in-hand

24 Oct 2015: POE !

15 Dec 2015: Fiance's mother's B-2 visa interview: APPROVED! So happy she will be at the wedding! :thumbs:

!

Filed: K-1 Visa Country: Wales
Timeline
Posted
1 hour ago, CatherineA said:

 

There's a waiver for the ban if they're trying to come back on a spouse visa or something but a tourist visa? I was long under the impression that once you've overstayed or otherwise abused a tourist visa, you were unlikely to be given another.... no?

 

 

OP: I really think that the lawyers may have been not talking about the bans themselves (maybe I'm not sure) but the general liklihood of getting a tourist visa after misusing the first one. The bans are bans from *any* visa, or entry in general (and are able to be waived for spouses/family for hardship reasons) but she'd not be guaranteed to get another tourist visa, ban or no ban and maybe that's what the lawyers were saying? That's always been my understanding of the situation. So she wouldn't be banned from the US generally (after the 3 years are up)-- she could still come back on a spouse visa, but they probably won't be in a rush to approve a tourist visa. 

D3 mentioned earlier in the thread. Couple of times.

“If you know the enemy and know yourself, you need not fear the result of a hundred battles. If you know yourself but not the enemy, for every victory gained you will also suffer a defeat. If you know neither the enemy nor yourself, you will succumb in every battle.”

 
Didn't find the answer you were looking for? Ask our VJ Immigration Lawyers.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
- Back to Top -

Important Disclaimer: Please read carefully the Visajourney.com Terms of Service. If you do not agree to the Terms of Service you should not access or view any page (including this page) on VisaJourney.com. Answers and comments provided on Visajourney.com Forums are general information, and are not intended to substitute for informed professional medical, psychiatric, psychological, tax, legal, investment, accounting, or other professional advice. Visajourney.com does not endorse, and expressly disclaims liability for any product, manufacturer, distributor, service or service provider mentioned or any opinion expressed in answers or comments. VisaJourney.com does not condone immigration fraud in any way, shape or manner. VisaJourney.com recommends that if any member or user knows directly of someone involved in fraudulent or illegal activity, that they report such activity directly to the Department of Homeland Security, Immigration and Customs Enforcement. You can contact ICE via email at Immigration.Reply@dhs.gov or you can telephone ICE at 1-866-347-2423. All reported threads/posts containing reference to immigration fraud or illegal activities will be removed from this board. If you feel that you have found inappropriate content, please let us know by contacting us here with a url link to that content. Thank you.
×
×
  • Create New...