Black Unemployment Rate Lowest in 17 Years

[Dashinka 24,502]

16 minutes ago, Steeleballz said:

 

    

I noticed WaPo left off 2009.  Wonder why that is?

[smilesammich 10,727]

Just now, Bill & Katya said:

I noticed WaPo left off 2009.  Wonder why that is?

gee, must be because wapo is trying to make obama look good and has nothing to do with the former administration's policies in effect.. 

[Dashinka 24,502]

Just now, smilesammich said:

gee, must be because wapo is trying to make obama look good and has nothing to do with the former administration's policies in effect.. 

Sure, Bush’s fault negating the impact the DNC controlled congress.

[smilesammich 10,727]

1 minute ago, Bill & Katya said:

Sure, Bush’s fault negating the impact the DNC controlled congress.

it's not about fault, it's about the policy in current effect. you know that, but it isn't convenient right now. 

[Steeleballz 7,550]

26 minutes ago, Bill & Katya said:

I noticed WaPo left off 2009.  Wonder why that is?

 

    NB never posted stuff like this in 2016, when the "black unemployment rate" was also at it's lowest since 2000. Wonder why that is?

[smilesammich 10,727]

2 minutes ago, Steeleballz said:

 

    NB never posted stuff like this in 2016, when the "black unemployment rate" was also at it's lowest since 2000. Wonder why that is?

maga?

 

[Voice of Reason 10,298]

56 minutes ago, Steeleballz said:

 

    NB never posted stuff like this in 2016, when the "black unemployment rate" was also at it's lowest since 2000. Wonder why that is?

2 reasons:

 

A) NB doesn’t make up the stories, he just posts what is put out.

 

2) The unemploymen rate for blacks in 2016 was 8.4% and in 2000 it was 7.6%, thereby making your claim false.  While not directly a violation of the Bible, per se, it would benefit the CEHST crowd if you didn’t go around making up your own statistics to try and make another member appear as if they have an hidden agenda.  It really does take away from one’s enjoyment of the forum, which IS a violation of the Bible.

[Voice of Reason 10,298]

[smilesammich 10,727]

1 minute ago, IDWAF said:

2 reasons:

 

A) NB doesn’t make up the stories, he just posts what is put out.

 

2) The unemploymen rate for blacks in 2016 was 8.4% and in 2000 it was 7.6%, thereby making your claim false.  While not directly a violation of the Bible, per se, it would benefit the CEHST crowd if you didn’t go around making up your own statistics to try and make another member appear as if they have an hidden agenda.  It really does take away from one’s enjoyment of the forum, which IS a violation of the Bible.

all while you're missing the point that 2016 @ 8.4% it was at it's lowest since 2000. steeleballz "claim" (really not a claim, just posting what is "put out") is not false.

[smilesammich 10,727]

1 minute ago, IDWAF said:

who's point are you trying to prove here? 

[Voice of Reason 10,298]

1 minute ago, smilesammich said:

all while you're missing the point that 2016 @ 8.4% it was at it's lowest since 2000. steeleballz "claim" (really not a claim, just posting what is "put out") is not false.

Ohhhh, I get it now.  8.4% is lower than 7.6%.  Common core, eh?  I’’m not really up on that math, my apologies.

[Voice of Reason 10,298]

2 minutes ago, smilesammich said:

who's point are you trying to prove here? 

I’m trying to help those who do not understand numbers real well by providing pictures.  It seems even that may not help everyone...

[smilesammich 10,727]

Just now, IDWAF said:

Ohhhh, I get it now.  8.4% is lower than 7.6%.  Common core, eh?  I’’m not really up on that math, my apologies.

no one said 8.4 is lower than 7.6. who said that?

 

[Voice of Reason 10,298]

Just now, smilesammich said:

no one said 8.4 is lower than 7.6. who said that?

 

You did, by refuting my post about the 2016 vs. 2000 numbers.

[smilesammich 10,727]

 

Just now, IDWAF said:

You did, by refuting my post about the 2016 vs. 2000 numbers.

nope, sure didn't. you might want to reread. and have another looksie at the graph. and then ponder the context of steelballz question. why didn't anyone ever post about the level of black unemployment in 2016 when the numbers got to their lowest since 2000?