Jump to content
The Nature  Boy

Twitter’s new rules could result in a major purge of alt-right accounts

 Share

32 posts in this topic

Recommended Posts

Twitter advertises its self as being a public commons much like a resturaunt or gas station. Imagine if one of those types of businesses refused to serve someone because of their political beliefs. Or if for example a cake maker refuses to serve someone because of their beliefs. Oh wait...

morfunphil1_zpsoja67jml.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: K-1 Visa Country: Wales
Timeline
43 minutes ago, jg121783 said:

Twitter advertises its self as being a public commons much like a resturaunt or gas station. Imagine if one of those types of businesses refused to serve someone because of their political beliefs. Or if for example a cake maker refuses to serve someone because of their beliefs. Oh wait...

Yet again that is different????

“If you know the enemy and know yourself, you need not fear the result of a hundred battles. If you know yourself but not the enemy, for every victory gained you will also suffer a defeat. If you know neither the enemy nor yourself, you will succumb in every battle.”

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, jg121783 said:

Twitter advertises its self as being a public commons much like a resturaunt or gas station. Imagine if one of those types of businesses refused to serve someone because of their political beliefs. Or if for example a cake maker refuses to serve someone because of their beliefs. Oh wait...

 

    Twitter has a terms of service agreement that you agree to just like many web sites. If you can't abide by it, find another site. I'm sure the racist jerks who can't abide by the new TOS will soon find a new hole to crawl down.

995507-quote-moderation-in-all-things-an

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, Steeleballz said:

 

    Twitter has a terms of service agreement that you agree to just like many web sites. If you can't abide by it, find another site. I'm sure the racist jerks who can't abide by the new TOS will soon find a new hole to crawl down.

They block and ban people who don't violate the terms of service just because of their political views. That is just as much discrimination as not baking a cake for someone because of how they choose to live their life.

morfunphil1_zpsoja67jml.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, jg121783 said:

They block and ban people who don't violate the terms of service just because of their political views. That is just as much discrimination as not baking a cake for someone because of how they choose to live their life.

racism is not a political view.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, Nature Boy Flair said:

Tell that to Sharpton. Race is his politics 

race ≠ racism

Link to comment
Share on other sites

28 minutes ago, jg121783 said:

They block and ban people who don't violate the terms of service just because of their political views. That is just as much discrimination as not baking a cake for someone because of how they choose to live their life.

 

  There is an appeals process. If someone believes they have been unfairly blocked they should avail themselves of that. I don't see a parallel between this and the baker case. Clearly the intent is that twitter users are blocked for cause, not indiscriminately. Anyway, as the MDR would say, if the  baker twitter doesn't want their "business" why would they even want to use the service?  

995507-quote-moderation-in-all-things-an

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: K-1 Visa Country: Wales
Timeline

67-of-americans-think-al-sharpton-is-a-r

“If you know the enemy and know yourself, you need not fear the result of a hundred battles. If you know yourself but not the enemy, for every victory gained you will also suffer a defeat. If you know neither the enemy nor yourself, you will succumb in every battle.”

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Steeleballz said:

 

    Twitter has a terms of service agreement that you agree to just like many web sites. If you can't abide by it, find another site. I'm sure the racist jerks who can't abide by the new TOS will soon find a new hole to crawl down.

 

Just like someone can go find another cake baker. :bonk:

 

 

Click Spoiler for signature timeline.

 

3/10/2013 - Married

Green Card Process Summary
3/25/2013 - Submitted I-130's
01/13/2014 - Embassy Interview - Approved!
05/28/2014 - POE (U.S. Customs and Immigration Overseas Preclearance Facility - Abu Dhabi)
08/20/2014 - Green Card received.

Naturalization Process

01/20/2015 - Submitted N-400 for immediate naturalization under INA 319b.

02/10/2015 - Check cashed.

02/14/2015 - NOA

04/07/2015 - Case shipped to local field office.

04/08/2015 - Interview scheduled for July 6, 2015.

04/08/2015 - Wifey better be studying her butt off for the citizenship test!

07/08/2015 - Wifey was studying her butt off and passed the test easily. Oath ceremony completed on same day! We are done with our journey!

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Ecuador
Timeline

An assaultive post and reply to it have been removed.  Be nice, please.

06-04-2007 = TSC stamps postal return-receipt for I-129f.

06-11-2007 = NOA1 date (unknown to me).

07-20-2007 = Phoned Immigration Officer; got WAC#; where's NOA1?

09-25-2007 = Touch (first-ever).

09-28-2007 = NOA1, 23 days after their 45-day promise to send it (grrrr).

10-20 & 11-14-2007 = Phoned ImmOffs; "still pending."

12-11-2007 = 180 days; file is "between workstations, may be early Jan."; touches 12/11 & 12/12.

12-18-2007 = Call; file is with Division 9 ofcr. (bckgrnd check); e-prompt to shake it; touch.

12-19-2007 = NOA2 by e-mail & web, dated 12-18-07 (187 days; 201 per VJ); in mail 12/24/07.

01-09-2008 = File from USCIS to NVC, 1-4-08; NVC creates file, 1/15/08; to consulate 1/16/08.

01-23-2008 = Consulate gets file; outdated Packet 4 mailed to fiancee 1/27/08; rec'd 3/3/08.

04-29-2008 = Fiancee's 4-min. consular interview, 8:30 a.m.; much evidence brought but not allowed to be presented (consul: "More proof! Second interview! Bring your fiance!").

05-05-2008 = Infuriating $12 call to non-English-speaking consulate appointment-setter.

05-06-2008 = Better $12 call to English-speaker; "joint" interview date 6/30/08 (my selection).

06-30-2008 = Stokes Interrogations w/Ecuadorian (not USC); "wait 2 weeks; we'll mail her."

07-2008 = Daily calls to DOS: "currently processing"; 8/05 = Phoned consulate, got Section Chief; wrote him.

08-07-08 = E-mail from consulate, promising to issue visa "as soon as we get her passport" (on 8/12, per DHL).

08-27-08 = Phoned consulate (they "couldn't find" our file); visa DHL'd 8/28; in hand 9/1; through POE on 10/9 with NO hassles(!).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Russia
Timeline
1 hour ago, Steeleballz said:

 

  There is an appeals process. If someone believes they have been unfairly blocked they should avail themselves of that. I don't see a parallel between this and the baker case. Clearly the intent is that twitter users are blocked for cause, not indiscriminately. Anyway, as the MDR would say, if the  baker twitter doesn't want their "business" why would they even want to use the service?  

Agreed, Twitter is a joke.

Visa Received : 2014-04-04 (K1 - see timeline for details)

US Entry : 2014-09-12

POE: Detroit

Marriage : 2014-09-27

I-765 Approved: 2015-01-09

I-485 Interview: 2015-03-11

I-485 Approved: 2015-03-13

Green Card Received: 2015-03-24 Yeah!!!

I-751 ROC Submitted: 2016-12-20

I-751 NOA Received:  2016-12-29

I-751 Biometrics Appt.:  2017-01-26

I-751 Interview:  2018-04-10

I-751 Approved:  2018-05-04

N400 Filed:  2018-01-13

N400 Biometrics:  2018-02-22

N400 Interview:  2018-04-10

N400 Approved:  2018-04-10

Oath Ceremony:  2018-06-11 - DONE!!!!!!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Russia
Timeline
2 minutes ago, smilesammich said:

which explains trump's affinity for it.

And a lot of other people.  I have always said I think Twitter is a joke and that I wish Trump didn’t use it, but I guess he sees it as a tool and that is his decision.

Visa Received : 2014-04-04 (K1 - see timeline for details)

US Entry : 2014-09-12

POE: Detroit

Marriage : 2014-09-27

I-765 Approved: 2015-01-09

I-485 Interview: 2015-03-11

I-485 Approved: 2015-03-13

Green Card Received: 2015-03-24 Yeah!!!

I-751 ROC Submitted: 2016-12-20

I-751 NOA Received:  2016-12-29

I-751 Biometrics Appt.:  2017-01-26

I-751 Interview:  2018-04-10

I-751 Approved:  2018-05-04

N400 Filed:  2018-01-13

N400 Biometrics:  2018-02-22

N400 Interview:  2018-04-10

N400 Approved:  2018-04-10

Oath Ceremony:  2018-06-11 - DONE!!!!!!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
- Back to Top -

Important Disclaimer: Please read carefully the Visajourney.com Terms of Service. If you do not agree to the Terms of Service you should not access or view any page (including this page) on VisaJourney.com. Answers and comments provided on Visajourney.com Forums are general information, and are not intended to substitute for informed professional medical, psychiatric, psychological, tax, legal, investment, accounting, or other professional advice. Visajourney.com does not endorse, and expressly disclaims liability for any product, manufacturer, distributor, service or service provider mentioned or any opinion expressed in answers or comments. VisaJourney.com does not condone immigration fraud in any way, shape or manner. VisaJourney.com recommends that if any member or user knows directly of someone involved in fraudulent or illegal activity, that they report such activity directly to the Department of Homeland Security, Immigration and Customs Enforcement. You can contact ICE via email at Immigration.Reply@dhs.gov or you can telephone ICE at 1-866-347-2423. All reported threads/posts containing reference to immigration fraud or illegal activities will be removed from this board. If you feel that you have found inappropriate content, please let us know by contacting us here with a url link to that content. Thank you.
×
×
  • Create New...