What should I do?!

[Boiler 45,939]

Let us know what happens.

[gregcrs2 1,778]

Just now, Boiler said:

Let us know what happens.

OP is now inquiring about a fiancé visa on another thread.

[Boiler 45,939]

2 minutes ago, gregcrs2 said:

OP is now inquiring about a fiancé visa on another thread.

Of course.

[NikLR 13,232]

3 hours ago, Nayan said:

my stay was of 6 months (the time that migration  gave to stay in My formI194) after that I stayed illegal for 11 months less than a year

So a total of 17 months in the usa with 180+ days of overstay but under 365+ days? Yes you had a 3 year ban.  Doubt there is a tourist visa in your future.  

[WeGuyGal 1,052]

5 hours ago, Nayan said:

I stayed in the United States for more than 6 months less than a year, so according to the penalty of 3 years that time was already pass, it means that I can go to ask for another visa?

Unlikely to be trusted with another B2, but the US would never say no to your $160.

[jan22 3,056]

5 hours ago, NikLR said:

If you stayed less than a year total then you had no ban. However as mentioned, another tourist visa will ask about the overstay. 

An overstay of more than 180 days but less than 365 days there is, in fact, a 3 year ineligibility.

 

OP:  How long ago was the 3 year ineligibility up?

[CheeseMonstah 87]

2 hours ago, Nayan said:

I say i deserve the penalty  of overstay  (was wrong)

I dont say i deserve a New visa .

You can always apply, as you stated you do deserve to be treated according to the laws of the land.

 

Now, there's a very, very, very high possibility that you'll be denied.

 

Unless you have an amazingly compelling reason for having overstayed.

 

Remember: the officer will be analyzing what are the odds you will not comply with the terms of your requested visa (such as immigrating, overstaying, performing activities not allowed by that type of visa etc). You already have a history of disobeying the terms of a visa, so that gives precedent.

[NikLR 13,232]

41 minutes ago, jan22 said:

An overstay of more than 180 days but less than 365 days there is, in fact, a 3 year ineligibility.

 

OP:  How long ago was the 3 year ineligibility up?

Yes.. I know.  Did you read my entire statement? If, you have stayed less than 1 year total, including the visa stay that would likely be less than 180 days of overstay.  But  that wasnt the case for the OP anyhow as they clarified 

[Boiler 45,939]

OP's friend it seems.

[maryLu 58]

 An overstay over 180 days  triggers the  3 year ban . An overstay of over 1 year triggers the 10 year ban.  

 

Edited December 13, 2017 by maryLu

[jan22 3,056]

1 hour ago, NikLR said:

Yes.. I know.  Did you read my entire statement? If, you have stayed less than 1 year total, including the visa stay that would likely be less than 180 days of overstay.  But  that wasnt the case for the OP anyhow as they clarified 

I did, indeed, read your entire statement in which you definitively stated that if you stayed less than a year total there was no ban. There is no way anyone can make that statement, since there was no information provided as to the length of stay that he was granted at the Port of Entry.  It assumes he was granted 6 months upon entry, but as you know, that is  not always the case.  People with less knowledge than you have could be misled by that statement, which is why I clarified.

Edited December 13, 2017 by jan22

[NikLR 13,232]

16 minutes ago, maryLu said:

 An overstay over 180 days  triggers the  3 year ban . An overstay of over 1 year triggers the 10 year ban.  

 

Thanks.. i know.  But its number of days not months or a year that triggers the ban. 

12 minutes ago, jan22 said:

I did, indeed, read your entire statement in which you definitively stated that if you stayed less than a year total there was no ban. There is no way anyone can make that statement, since there was no information provided as to the length of stay that he was granted at the Port of Entry.  It assumes he was granted 6 months upon entry, but as you know, that is  not always the case.  People with less knowledge than you have could be misled by that statement, which is why I clarified.

True enough. 

[gregcrs2 1,778]

8 minutes ago, jan22 said:

I did, indeed, read your entire statement in which you definitively stated that if you stayed less than a year total there was no ban. There is no way anyone can make that statement, since there was no information provided as to the length of stay that he was granted at the Port of Entry.  It assumes he was granted 6 months upon entry, but as you know, that is  not always the case.  People with less knowledge than you have could be misled by that statement, which is why I clarified.

There is no assumption that 6 month stay was granted.  OP stated I-94 for 6 months. 

[titiung 4]

6 hours ago, az2014 said:

Why do you tell people good luck who obviously don't deserve it?

Why can't people say "good luck"? It's his opinion.

About the situation, yes whether he overstayed illegally or not, it's up to the immigration office to decide. I personally believe saying "good luck" simply means that good luck to his application process, NOT  to show support for his illegal overstay.

[jan22 3,056]

4 minutes ago, gregcrs2 said:

There is no assumption that 6 month stay was granted.  OP stated I-94 for 6 months. 

Yes, he said that in a clarifying post after the assumption had already been made in an earlier post.