Texts between ex-Mueller team members emerge, calling Trump 'loathsome human,' 'an idiot

[jayjayj 571]

23 minutes ago, Bill & Katya said:

One wonders if he was speaking of the dossier the Hillary campaign funded through a foreign agent?

I have no doubt he was speaking about that.  The fact that it was discussed in "Andy's office" makes it all the more alarming.  Anyone trying to dismiss this as run of the mill bias is neither rational nor honest.  

[Steeleballz 7,550]

Just now, jayjayj said:

Wrong on so many levels.

 

So showing bias prior to be assigned to an investigation doesn't concern you at all?  Your going to dismiss it in this case based on your political biases?  You aren't addressing the elephant in the room though.  What was the "insurance policy" that was going to be implemented if Trump won the election?  

 

   What you posted has not shown bias in the investigation. It shows the individual doesn't like Trump, something he has in common with about 65% of the general population.

 

  

[Dashinka 24,513]

2 minutes ago, jayjayj said:

Wrong on so many levels.

 

So showing bias prior to being assigned to an investigation doesn't concern you at all?  Your going to dismiss it in this case based on your political biases?  You aren't addressing the elephant in the room though.  What was the "insurance policy" that was going to be implemented if Trump won the election?  

Agreed, this sounds a lot more like the colluding the MDL has been searching for on the Trump side.  I think a good defense attorney would be putting Strzok through the wringer with all of his text messages to Lisa Page (10,000 or so).  I often wonder what people would say if this was GOP conflicts of interest and they were investigating Hillary.

[jayjayj 571]

1 minute ago, Steeleballz said:

 

   What you posted has not shown bias in the investigation. It shows the individual doesn't like Trump, something he has in common with about 65% of the general population.

 

  

Sure it does.  You just don't want to believe it.  That doesn't mean it isn't true.

 

What was the "insurance policy" that might have to be initiated if Trump won the election?  Were they going to get together for tea and crumpets at McCabe's house?  Were they doing to cozy up to Trump to avoid have a special counsel investigate them personally?  What was it?  

Just now, Bill & Katya said:

Agreed, this sounds a lot more like the colluding the MDL has been searching for on the Trump side.  I think a good defense attorney would be putting Strzok through the wringer with all of his text messages to Lisa Page (10,000 or so).  I often wonder what people would say if this was GOP conflicts of interest and they were investigating Hillary.

They would be screaming at the sky. 

[Amica Nostra 4,803]

1 minute ago, jayjayj said:

Sure it does.  You just don't want to believe it.  That doesn't mean it isn't true.

 

What was the "insurance policy" that might have to be initiated if Trump won the election?  Were they going to get together for tea and crumpets at McCabe's house?  Were they doing to cozy up to Trump to avoid have a special counsel investigate them personally?  What was it?  

They would be screaming at the sky. 

Only fans of Trump can work on the team investigating his admin.  MAGA = Mueller Ain't Going Away.

[Steeleballz 7,550]

2 minutes ago, jayjayj said:

Sure it does.  You just don't want to believe it.  That doesn't mean it isn't true.

 

What was the "insurance policy" that might have to be initiated if Trump won the election?  Were they going to get together for tea and crumpets at McCabe's house?  Were they doing to cozy up to Trump to avoid have a special counsel investigate them personally?  What was it?  

They would be screaming at the sky. 

 

   I don't know and neither do you. If it makes any difference though, if it comes to it, I do hope a defense attorney uses your same line of reasoning. 

[jayjayj 571]

Just now, Il Mango Dulce said:

Only fans of Trump can work on the team investigating his admin.  MAGA = Mueller Ain't Going Away.

I hope not.  He is heading right for Obama and Hilary - the real Russian collusion scandal. Liberal tears will run just like they did on election night. 

[Amica Nostra 4,803]

Just now, jayjayj said:

I hope not.  He is heading right for Obama and Hilary - the real Russian collusion scandal. Liberal tears will run just like they did on election night. 

Good luck with that

[jayjayj 571]

Just now, Steeleballz said:

 

   I don't know and neither do you. If it makes any difference though, if it comes to it, I do hope a defense attorney uses your same line of reasoning. 

Defense attorney for what?  I didn't realize a trial about these text messages started already.

Just now, Il Mango Dulce said:

Good luck with that

Thanks!  I'm glad you are willing to acknowledge the reality of the investigation.

[Dashinka 24,513]

10 minutes ago, Steeleballz said:

 

   What you posted has not shown bias in the investigation. It shows the individual doesn't like Trump, something he has in common with about 65% of the general population.

 

  

Like I said earlier, let’s keep the investigation going.  All the information coming out regarding the biases within the DOJ career folks is very telling.  However, there does need to be an independent investigator appointed to look into the DOJ and FBI , I don’t think we can trust their inspector general.

[smilesammich 10,727]

2 minutes ago, Il Mango Dulce said:

Good luck with that

guess that's why they got flynn..right to hillary

 

 

[jayjayj 571]

Just now, smilesammich said:

guess that's why they got flynn..right to hillary

 

 

Yes!  They got someone who was part of the Obama administration for almost a year before being part of the Trump transitional team for less than 2 months.  I do agree though, move straight to Hillary.  

[smilesammich 10,727]

5 minutes ago, jayjayj said:

Yes!  They got someone who was part of the Obama administration for almost a year before being part of the Trump transitional team for less than 2 months.  I do agree though, move straight to Hillary.  

[jayjayj 571]

1 minute ago, smilesammich said:

Great counter point!  I don't know why I even try to argue with you. 

Edited December 14, 2017 by jayjayj

[The Nature Boy 7,659]

38 minutes ago, Steeleballz said:

 

  No. If you have to extrapolate that someones judgement in an investigation was affected from a text they sent prior to that investigation occuring, you are missing the "reasonable" part of reasonable doubt. Personal dislike and the thought that someone's judgement "might" have been affected may get you dismissed from jury duty, but a defense attorney (in the hypothetical case Bill is imagining) better have more than that.

You mean like when OJ who was guilt as sin was set free because they tried to taint Mark F as a racist