Jump to content

8 posts in this topic

Recommended Posts

Filed: IR-1/CR-1 Visa Country: Japan
Timeline
Posted

My husband moved from Japan to Nevada last month, sent I130 and has just received NOA1.

I'm a bit discouraged that our case was received by Nebraska SC, not California SC which should be the jurisdiction of Nevada. 

I was planning to send I129F to apply for K3, but if it'll be also received by NSC, it seems useless since the processing time of I129F at NSC is not so different from that of I130. 

I'm thinking of sending I129F if there's any possibility that it'll be received by California SC because the processing time of I129F at CSC is much faster. 

Anyone, please advise. 

Posted (edited)

Petitions and applications that don't require an interview are sent to the service centers to adjudicate. It's based on managing workload using whatever magic formula USCIS has, not based on location (as there's no reason it needs to be closer to you...you will never go there).

 

K-3 is obsolete and almost never issued anymore. They turn into a CR-1 anyway.

Current USCIS policy is to adjudicate an I-129F for a spouse with the I-130.

Current NVC policy is that if an approved I-130 arrives before or at the same time as an approved I-129F, then the I-129F is administratively closed.

Using the 2 policies above creates a situation in which almost all K-3 processes are stopped at either USCIS (when the I-130 is approved, sometimes they deny the I-129F outright as "benefit obtained via another means") or NVC (via administratively closing it).

 

As noted above, if you sent an I-129F, it would also be sent NSC since it would be adjudicated with the corresponding I-130.

Edited by geowrian

Timelines:

ROC:

Spoiler

7/27/20: Sent forms to Dallas lockbox, 7/30/20: Received by USCIS, 8/10 NOA1 electronic notification received, 8/1/ NOA1 hard copy received

AOS:

Spoiler

AOS (I-485 + I-131 + I-765):

9/25/17: sent forms to Chicago, 9/27/17: received by USCIS, 10/4/17: NOA1 electronic notification received, 10/10/17: NOA1 hard copy received. Social Security card being issued in married name (3rd attempt!)

10/14/17: Biometrics appointment notice received, 10/25/17: Biometrics

1/2/18: EAD + AP approved (no website update), 1/5/18: EAD + AP mailed, 1/8/18: EAD + AP approval notice hardcopies received, 1/10/18: EAD + AP received

9/5/18: Interview scheduled notice, 10/17/18: Interview

10/24/18: Green card produced notice, 10/25/18: Formal approval, 10/31/18: Green card received

K-1:

Spoiler

I-129F

12/1/16: sent, 12/14/16: NOA1 hard copy received, 3/10/17: RFE (IMB verification), 3/22/17: RFE response received

3/24/17: Approved! , 3/30/17: NOA2 hard copy received

 

NVC

4/6/2017: Received, 4/12/2017: Sent to Riyadh embassy, 4/16/2017: Case received at Riyadh embassy, 4/21/2017: Request case transfer to Manila, approved 4/24/2017

 

K-1

5/1/2017: Case received by Manila (1 week embassy transfer??? Lucky~)

7/13/2017: Interview: APPROVED!!!

7/19/2017: Visa in hand

8/15/2017: POE

 

Posted

USCIS does not consider our convenience or wishes when sending cases to service centers for adjudication. It's all about workloads and resources. When we filed last year California was processing much faster than Nebraska and my husband was born in California. Deep down I secretly hoped the sight of his bright blue California birth certificate might prompt the employee at Phoenix lock box to send it to California but no such luck. Nebraska it was. All we could do was wait.

 

Take comfort knowing you are not alone in this waiting. Thousands are waiting to be reunited with their spouses. Was your husband living with you in Japan? At least you have those memories of good times to cherish - many of us don't have that luxury of being able to live together overseas prior to this process. Every day that goes by you're a day closer to the end. That's what I used to tell myself.  

Timeline in brief:

Married: September 27, 2014

I-130 filed: February 5, 2016

NOA1: February 8, 2016 Nebraska

NOA2: July 21, 2016

Interview: December 6, 2016 London

POE: December 19, 2016 Las Vegas

N-400 filed: September 30, 2019

Interview: March 22, 2021 Seattle

Oath: March 22, 2021 COVID-style same-day oath

 

Now a US citizen!

Filed: IR-1/CR-1 Visa Country: Japan
Timeline
Posted (edited)

We've been married for more than 10 years in Japan. 

We have two kids and they are waiting to see their father. 

I know all I have to do is to wait, but can't help seeking for the faster way. 

I'm deeply grateful for your heartwarming message. 

Edited by macarons365
Posted

unfortuneatly the K3 saves maybe a few months at most to visa, if you manage to get that far, but costs more than twice the IR1 and takes twice as long to green card.  Honestly, the IR1 is worth waiting  the extra few months for. 

You have brains in your head. You have feet in your shoes. You can steer yourself any direction you choose.  - Dr. Seuss

 

Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Ecuador
Timeline
Posted

Thread is moved from the K-3 Process forum to the CR-1 Case Progress subforum.

06-04-2007 = TSC stamps postal return-receipt for I-129f.

06-11-2007 = NOA1 date (unknown to me).

07-20-2007 = Phoned Immigration Officer; got WAC#; where's NOA1?

09-25-2007 = Touch (first-ever).

09-28-2007 = NOA1, 23 days after their 45-day promise to send it (grrrr).

10-20 & 11-14-2007 = Phoned ImmOffs; "still pending."

12-11-2007 = 180 days; file is "between workstations, may be early Jan."; touches 12/11 & 12/12.

12-18-2007 = Call; file is with Division 9 ofcr. (bckgrnd check); e-prompt to shake it; touch.

12-19-2007 = NOA2 by e-mail & web, dated 12-18-07 (187 days; 201 per VJ); in mail 12/24/07.

01-09-2008 = File from USCIS to NVC, 1-4-08; NVC creates file, 1/15/08; to consulate 1/16/08.

01-23-2008 = Consulate gets file; outdated Packet 4 mailed to fiancee 1/27/08; rec'd 3/3/08.

04-29-2008 = Fiancee's 4-min. consular interview, 8:30 a.m.; much evidence brought but not allowed to be presented (consul: "More proof! Second interview! Bring your fiance!").

05-05-2008 = Infuriating $12 call to non-English-speaking consulate appointment-setter.

05-06-2008 = Better $12 call to English-speaker; "joint" interview date 6/30/08 (my selection).

06-30-2008 = Stokes Interrogations w/Ecuadorian (not USC); "wait 2 weeks; we'll mail her."

07-2008 = Daily calls to DOS: "currently processing"; 8/05 = Phoned consulate, got Section Chief; wrote him.

08-07-08 = E-mail from consulate, promising to issue visa "as soon as we get her passport" (on 8/12, per DHL).

08-27-08 = Phoned consulate (they "couldn't find" our file); visa DHL'd 8/28; in hand 9/1; through POE on 10/9 with NO hassles(!).

 
Didn't find the answer you were looking for? Ask our VJ Immigration Lawyers.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
- Back to Top -

Important Disclaimer: Please read carefully the Visajourney.com Terms of Service. If you do not agree to the Terms of Service you should not access or view any page (including this page) on VisaJourney.com. Answers and comments provided on Visajourney.com Forums are general information, and are not intended to substitute for informed professional medical, psychiatric, psychological, tax, legal, investment, accounting, or other professional advice. Visajourney.com does not endorse, and expressly disclaims liability for any product, manufacturer, distributor, service or service provider mentioned or any opinion expressed in answers or comments. VisaJourney.com does not condone immigration fraud in any way, shape or manner. VisaJourney.com recommends that if any member or user knows directly of someone involved in fraudulent or illegal activity, that they report such activity directly to the Department of Homeland Security, Immigration and Customs Enforcement. You can contact ICE via email at Immigration.Reply@dhs.gov or you can telephone ICE at 1-866-347-2423. All reported threads/posts containing reference to immigration fraud or illegal activities will be removed from this board. If you feel that you have found inappropriate content, please let us know by contacting us here with a url link to that content. Thank you.
×
×
  • Create New...