Trump makes a fool of himself and Americans

[Dunngary 37]

https://www.thetimes.co.uk/edition/news/mps-accuse-fascist-trump-of-spreading-evil-over-britain-first-tweets-csvmnhpbn

 

Fascist Trump is being accused of spreading evil with his tweets. Explains why his base is pro fascism.

[yuna628 9,676]

The bad part is... that Trump basically promoted a group which is pretty much a terrorist organization and contributed to the murder of a member of Parliament.

The sad part is.. he likely had no clue who they even are and hasn't the stones to apologize.

[Dunngary 37]

There is a sadder part: he is supposed to represent this country and he does at the worst possible level.

[bcking 3,157]

11 minutes ago, yuna628 said:

The bad part is... that Trump basically promoted a group which is pretty much a terrorist organization and contributed to the murder of a member of Parliament.

The sad part is.. he likely had no clue who they even are and hasn't the stones to apologize.

In all honest I think the second part is most likely true. He probably had no idea who he was retweeting/requoting. He's done it a few times before.

 

http://www.cnn.com/2017/11/29/politics/trump-anti-muslim-tweets/index.html

 

Apparently it doesn't matter if the videos are real or not. 

 

So I guess in this case the "Fake News" is what really matters in the end? Hard to keep track with this administration when they hate fake news and when they love it.

[smilesammich 10,727]

trump has tweeted like 20 times trying to bury this embarrassment...

 

 

[Dunngary 37]

Small hands take over. He needs to embarrass himself and all os us some more.

[Cyberfx1024 7,980]

41 minutes ago, yuna628 said:

The bad part is... that Trump basically promoted a group which is pretty much a terrorist organization and contributed to the murder of a member of Parliament.

The sad part is.. he likely had no clue who they even are and hasn't the stones to apologize.

So my question to you is how is Britain First a terrorist organization at all? I follow them on FB and I find them to be pretty much Anti-Jihadist, and they have had Sikhs on there as well. All they want is to make sure that the UK stays like it is and does not turn into a jihadi hellhole. 

11 minutes ago, Dunngary said:

Small hands take over. He needs to embarrass himself and all os us some more.

I much rather would have small hands than a small mind or intellect like you. All you want to do is bash bash bash. 

Edited November 30, 2017 by cyberfx1024

[yuna628 9,676]

1 minute ago, cyberfx1024 said:

So my question to you is how is Britain United a terrorist organization at all? I follow them on FB and I find them to be pretty much Anti-Jihadist, and they have had Sikhs on there as well. 

Britain First is a terrorist organization that contributed to the assassination of a member of Parliament. If you follow them, and see nothing amiss, then sadly nothing I will say will convince you otherwise. I won't be jumping down that rabbit hole with you, because I won't mince pleasant words about them or their behavior, and I'd rather keep things family friendly.

[bcking 3,157]

3 minutes ago, cyberfx1024 said:

So my question to you is how is Britain United a terrorist organization at all? I follow them on FB and I find them to be pretty much Anti-Jihadist, and they have had Sikhs on there as well. 

The group is Britain First, not sure if that was a typo or if you follow a different organization on FB.

 

In my opinion they aren't quite at the level of "terrorist organization", though they aren't a great group of people.

 

The man who shot Jo Cox possibly yelled "Britain First", though the organization condemned the attack.

Both of the leaders of the movement have been charged on multiple occasions for religiously aggravated harassment

They have, repeatedly and intentionally, altered imagery to suit their agenda and to sow hatred

At least one of their leaders is banned from entering mosques all together for a few years, due to the religious-motivated hateful protesting she encouraged at a local mosque in the UK

etc...

 

So overall not the greatest chaps. Certainly not deserving or recognition from the President.

 

[yuna628 9,676]

3 minutes ago, bcking said:

The group is Britain First, not sure if that was a typo or if you follow a different organization on FB.

 

In my opinion they aren't quite at the level of "terrorist organization", though they aren't a great group of people.

 

The man who shot Jo Cox possibly yelled "Britain First", though the organization condemned the attack.

Both of the leaders of the movement have been charged on multiple occasions for religiously aggravated harassment

They have, repeatedly and intentionally, altered imagery to suit their agenda and to sow hatred

At least one of their leaders is banned from entering mosques all together for a few years, due to the religious-motivated hateful protesting she encouraged at a local mosque in the UK

etc...

 

So overall not the greatest chaps. Certainly not deserving or recognition from the President.

 

There's deeper connections than the guy simply yelling that out btw.... but I won't be getting into that here. They are violent people, and are connected to other organizations in the UK, in the US, and across the EU that funnel money and materials (which include Nazi propaganda and illegal weapons and devices)... these have deep ties and agendas to neo-Nazi groups that have a big central goal of... not very pleasant things.

Edited November 30, 2017 by yuna628

[Cyberfx1024 7,980]

3 minutes ago, yuna628 said:

Britain First is a terrorist organization that contributed to the assassination of a member of Parliament. If you follow them, and see nothing amiss, then sadly nothing I will say will convince you otherwise. I won't be jumping down that rabbit hole with you, because I won't mince pleasant words about them or their behavior, and I'd rather keep things family friendly.

 

2 minutes ago, bcking said:

The group is Britain First, not sure if that was a typo or if you follow a different organization on FB.

 

In my opinion they aren't quite at the level of "terrorist organization", though they aren't a great group of people.

 

The man who shot Jo Cox possibly yelled "Britain First", though the organization condemned the attack.

Both of the leaders of the movement have been charged on multiple occasions for religiously aggravated harassment

They have, repeatedly and intentionally, altered imagery to suit their agenda and to sow hatred

At least one of their leaders is banned from entering mosques all together for a few years, due to the religious-motivated hateful protesting she encouraged at a local mosque in the UK

etc...

 

So overall not the greatest chaps. Certainly not deserving or recognition from the President.

 

Yeah I corrected my original statement if you go back and look. 

 

I don't know that bit about them contributing to an assassination of a member of a Parliament. I do follow them on FB and I don't find anything amiss at all and I am not racist or xenophobic at all. 

 

Yeah I always see that they are being harassed on FB by the police. I don't see how harassing people because they are jihadists is a bad thing. 

[smilesammich 10,727]

2 minutes ago, cyberfx1024 said:

 

Yeah I always see that they are being harassed on FB by the police. I don't see how harassing people because they are jihadists is a bad thing. 

you don't find anything amiss with spreading false propaganda to further public hatred of muslims (not just jihadists, take off the kid gloves).

[Cyberfx1024 7,980]

1 hour ago, smilesammich said:

you don't find anything amiss with spreading false propaganda to further public hatred of muslims (not just jihadists, take off the kid gloves).

What I have been seeing is that they are the one ones trying to reveal the truth about the grooming going on and people are trying to call them Anti-Islamic. 

[smilesammich 10,727]

Just now, cyberfx1024 said:

What I have been seeing is that they are the one ones trying to reveal the truth about the grooming going on and people are trying to call them Anti-Islamic. 

they are anti islamic. reverse this below and you might see the problem..imagine muslims invading catholic churches, accusing them of grooming children for sex slavery, handing out korans while insisting that catholicism is false and they should follow islam. 

 

Quote

Entry of mosques and distribution of leaflets and Bibles

In May 2014, members of Britain First invaded ten Bradford mosques, as well as ones in Glasgow,^[37] Luton and East London.^[10] They made statements of the action of Muslim grooming gangs in the area, accusing the community elders of failing to stop the gangs, while handing out Army Bibles^{[clarification needed]} and proselytising Christianity and telling one member to "reject the false prophet Muhammad and read the Bible". They also went to a Labour office to inform them that "they had been warned".^[37] In response, the Member of Parliament for Bradford West George Galloway said, "This is a grave and national issue. We demand full police action and protection of Mosques and worshippers."^[55] The police said that they were investigating.^[37]

 

[Cyberfx1024 7,980]

20 minutes ago, smilesammich said:

they are anti islamic. reverse this below and you might see the problem..imagine muslims invading catholic churches, accusing them of grooming children for sex slavery, handing out korans while insisting that catholicism is false and they should follow islam. 

 

 

But that is a known fact of Islamic gangs grooming young children for sex or am I wrong on that?